1
Jeff45628 1 point ago +1 / -0

then you got other democrats with ties to the Saudis... which it's suspected are unified collision with the CCP, so these Democrats shouldn't look at as government officials, but foreign agents for the CCP and Saudis, which would explain why they want to go to war with Russia. Basically, they want control over the energy market

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/weekly-standard/the-strange-case-of-debbie-wasserman-schulzs-it-guy

1
Jeff45628 1 point ago +1 / -0

steal their vote [and lives]

4
Jeff45628 4 points ago +4 / -0

It was fraud, I don't think anyone has debated it

The problem is Obama packs the courts with Federal attorneys and they fight everything

1
Jeff45628 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bush Sr starts a war in the Middle East [Amesty for millions]

Clinton pays off the national debt and kills military spending, does nothing about immigration, fights impeachment

Bush Jr allows 9-11 to happen and passes the patriot bill

Obama increases the police state, says a lot of good things, but puts in place federal judges and state officials to start the coup and bring about socialism

Trump [do nothing president] big talker, but can't get much done, seems to pass the buck on every policy. Increases the power of the democrats and deep state, by standing back as they fixed the election, not just for the presidency, but for congress too

2
Jeff45628 2 points ago +2 / -0

you would need the entire west coast to hold it militarily

it is crazy how Schummer called the national guard to the Washington DC, but no into new york for the protests and riots

Democrats have the media and they would find a reason to nuke Texas if they left and use the media to conceal the story

1
Jeff45628 1 point ago +1 / -0

or do that with all the ballots?

didn't Georgia pay Dominion like 180 million for these machines?

1
Jeff45628 1 point ago +1 / -0

did your lobbyist pay money to the Clinton Foundation?

sorry, we can't help you

1
Jeff45628 1 point ago +1 / -0

Rep. Renitta Shannon, "in this election, 65% of democrats votes came from mail in ballots, while 35% republicans were..." this would be 100%.

Two different sums add up to 100%??

I could understand if the percentage of mail in ballots 20% of ballots cast for republicans were from mail in ballots and 67% of the democrat vote were for cast using mail in ballots, but if the two add up 100%

Her point was that republicans were big proponents of mail in ballots prior to these elections and now that Democrats are using the system they are complaining.

This is crazy logic. I would assume mail in ballots were for historic conservative votes, like elderly people and military personnel and they couldn't vote in person.