I mean if you're in GA go there. If you're near DC go there.

[Citation Needed]

Divorce and family courts almost exclusively side with women. Not saying it doesn't occur the other way around, but it's not "just as likely".

https://www.newsmax.com/stevegruber/divorce-family-court-marriage/2019/08/01/id/926906/

https://theindependent.com/opinion/another_opinion/state-supreme-court-bias-hurts-children-costs-taxpayers/article_52e783de-ac56-11e6-97bb-8bf12e340aaf.html

Edit: Even if you genuinely believe it's 50/50 then you should WANT to sign a prenup, as it would protect YOU as well.

Depends on if ballots were modified, added, or removed as well.

🤣

As someone with a similar gap, I'm gonna steal this joke to use on myself.

I still like listening to people who I disagree with to see how they're approaching things.

Pool earlier on at least was fairer than most other lefties.

Did we break their site?

Has someone already scraped/downloaded this information? If so please share!

Pretty sure we still can't cure death, especially after 7 years.

Hence why I said "solid", but that's still concerning.

Ok, well I wouldn't marry a woman who refused to sign one.

Ryan Long is hilarious and seriously underrated (although gaining some momentum).

Check out some of his other videos and subscribe if you haven't already!

Lol seems pretty spot on given his comment in the stream about how he would hang out with stoners but never smoke.

Nah, just get a solid prenup.

The state has no business being involved in marriage imo though.

Facebook has more control over it than Trump's team. It's their servers.

Screenshot of the article linked, since they try and prevent you from reading it without subscribing: https://i.maga.host/cXbUIGl.png

Uhh, what's with everyone saying almost the exact same thing in this comment thread?

Press enter/return twice for line breaks to show up.

This site is a fork of reddit, so the same styling info applies.

https://www.redditsecrets.com/reddit-formatting-help

Source?

If Biden's team end up pulling this off, I was thinking that one silver lining of it could at least be helping to shatter the statist two party system in the next election cycles.

They're supposed to do audits and zeroing before and after the election and hold onto the reports from those.

If those reports are somehow missing, that's another major red flag.

If data was deleted, unless all of it was completely destroyed and written over multiple times, there are still data recovery methods that could reveal the truth.

Either way I wouldn't trust the machines here. Audit + hand recount. Even then we can't be 100% sure that neither the machine nor individuals were modifying, adding, or removing physical ballots too.

They could also just shine a light on it and send it to the electoral college.

Good. Fuck Disney.

They ruined so many good Fox shows when they bought the network and Walt Disney was an anti-semite.

WOW all six examiners found serious issues and recommended denying certification!

Thanks for sharing!

Well if you can, that's a big problem. They're not supposed to have internet access, for obvious security reasons.

Closest I've found are reports like these from security researchers who have viewed the source: https://votingsystems.cdn.sos.ca.gov/vendors/dominion/ds52-sc.pdf

Sixty-nine discrepancies were identified within the Dominion Democracy Suite 5.2 code base. Several potential vulnerabilities were identified within the Dominion Democracy Suite 5.2 code base, within either the ICE code base or the ICX code base.

Within the Dominion Democracy Suite 5.2 ICX code base, one potential vulnerability was discovered and the level of access required to take advantage of this potential vulnerability would be open to a variety of actors including a voter, a poll worker, an election official insider, and a vendor insider. This possible vulnerability has a more widespread potential. Polling place procedures are one method of mitigating this issue, with poll workers actively verifying that the USB ports are sealed and no one has access.

Hilarious to compare what the author wrote there to his Twitter feed.

https://twitter.com/fbajak

Might not like it, but it's not unconstitutional. They're a private organization and have the right to refuse service for whatever reason.

Why the fuck would you want to give Ticketmaster your money anyway?