They didn't "take over." They've been in control, probably as long as some of us have been alive. I'd say at least since the first Bush Sr. administration. Trump just pulled back the curtain long enough to let us know what's really going on.
Not the mastermind, no. But he was in on it. He announced it more than once on national TV.
I don't know about that. Wilson gave us a treaty that led directly to WWII so that he could start the League of Nations, which was so bad even his own Congress wouldn't authorize joining; brought us into WWI both too early and too late at the same time; and gave us fiat currency by introducing European-style banking and the Fed, leading to the economic collapse of the Great Depression.
Amnesty might possibly backfire in the long run, if it means Mexican laborers end up no longer working under the table. They start paying taxes and a whole lot of them might just get redpilled. It's not likely, but no one saw Cuban Miami going red, either.
He's got Obama and Woodrow Wilson to beat. That's some tough competition.
Some animals are more equal than others.
Yep. The Supreme Court TOTALLY waited until almost a year after the election to make a decision in Gore v. Bush. Completely normal. Nothing to see here.
My grandma and I have a running gag that she's now a cyborg.
Transhumanism is the idea that human being can be "enhanced" with technology to become something more. This is one wing of it, wanting to create an army of slaves to serve the elite. Personally, I'm intrigued by the idea of adding new senses, but wouldn't go so far as to surgically alter myself to do so.
They killed a state speaker of the house, too? Damn.
Own a diesel car, and it's pretty quick and easy to convert it to run off woodgas. You'd need a whole array of solar, and not a small one, to power up your EV. Plus, you're stuck within a certain range. Electric cars have a much smaller range than gas powered, and gas powered can be refueled from multiple sources. Unless you've got a diesel generator when your car runs out of fuel, you'd be SOL.
If anything, he was duped along with a great many of us. I'm still hearing the Q crowd with their "trust the plan" nonsense. If you're onboard the Q train, you're not my enemy, either. But at this point it seems obvious to me you've fallen for a psy-op. Likewise, don't blame me if I have trouble with your source not producing results. If that ever happens, I'll gladly eat my words.
But we need to band together, now more than ever, regardless of how we might have gotten here.
I'm not fine with it. Had Pence not stabbed us all in the back, Trump would be in the White House right now.
Dude, I'm as anti-mask as anyone and have never worn one, but I don't think it needs to extend to other articles of clothing. I'm sure your wife has good intentions, but your coworkers really don't need that kind of distraction.
I live just outside of Orlando. I've never worn one and never will.
Tell me about it. People I thought would never bow to tyranny have proven to have no backbone.
The Greeks were hardly the first culture to practice homosexuality. Heck, there's homosexuality in some versions of The Epic of Gilgamesh. Funny, though, how it always gains prevalence around the collapse of a civilization, never near the start or at the height.
Okay. So you want to scapegoat Jews for the system's shortcomings. Obviously, it's too convenient a crutch for you to cling to, and you're not going to be reasoned with. It's an emotional thing. I get it, it's a hard world, and some people just can't live without putting a face to their misery.
But it's your misery, so I'll leave you to it.
The problem is that we'd have to get at least 80% of the GOP, and 25% of Democrats while both are cheating. They'd probably treat a Patriot Party like a vote piggy bank, shuffling 80% of the votes back to Democrat candidates, because who would be surprised that a third party candidate isn't winning? They did it so blatantly already, nothing will keep them from doing it again.
Yes, I believe it. It's written right in the Bible.
It's interesting to me that you jumped straight to, "you're either ignorant or in on it," though. I've told you, yes, there are clearly a disproportionate number of people with Jewish ancestry at the top, and explained why that's not surprising.
I'm also not interested in entertaining books or websites that demonize an entire people group for the actions of a few. If you were to point out books that show the Rothschilds were devil-worshippers, I wouldn't balk in the slightest. But to direct me to a website depicting Jews as hook-nosed hunched over bald inhuman figures tells me you're more interested in race-baiting than arriving at the truth. It's no different than the 1619 project, cherry-picking history to push a very flawed perspective. I'm willing to entertain facts about individuals, or even families, but how can I trust a source willing to push such blatantly propagandistic pabulum that's clearly only there to appeal to baser emotions? If they're trying to sell me a rational argument, why the dire emotional appeal?
Man, I really wanted to think you had something. You should know, I'm Jewish. The powers that be, whoever they may be, are using Jews as a scapegoat. A diversion to paint the Right as bigoted. I do believe there are people with Jewish ancestry among them, and they are probably overrepresented, but trust me, it's not "the Joos!"
It should come as no surprise that from among a group of people unjustly persecuted throughout history that a greater number would emerge willing to break the rules to have their way. But for every Epstein, there's a Clinton. For every Rothschild, there's a Rockefeller.
There is a vast conspiracy, but it's no more inherently Jewish than a pork hamentaschen.
I was agreeing with you. Tax rebellion wouldn't be effective because there aren't enough people able to participate. Personally, I believe secession is the only viable way forward. It would likely start with a group of states, led by Texas, forming a separate union and then declaring independence. Realistically, though, that's just kicking the ball down the street. Any government we set up will be eventually infiltrated, just as our current one was.
What you're saying regarding the civil war is very interesting. Any sources you can refer me to so I can find out more? The pattern you lay out makes sense out of a lot of strange historical phenomena.
One question I'd really like answered is how do disruptive influences like TR and Trump manage to infiltrate and pull back the curtain for a time? Is it part of the plan? To make it seem as though we're taking back ground, when, really, we're not? Are they controlled opposition, or is it a legitimate chink in their armor we can exploit?
Sure he remembers. He was just lounging around on the grass. Like a little hill or something.
Orange man bad?
Only because they cheated their way into the government exactly the same way the Democrats just did. Exactly the same way. And Harris is set to play the part of Hitler.
He still knew about it.