JEANINE YAÑEZ IS A CONSERVATIVE HERO, A PATRIOT WHO IS IN PRISON SINCE MARCH 12TH, THEY ACCUSED HER OF TERRORISM AND SEDITION! FREEDOM FOR HER, BASED PATRIOT!
Yes, that's from 2019. Epilogue: In November 2019, on the brink of civil war when no one wanted to take over the hot potato, the brave conservative senator, Jeanine Añez, takes the interim presidency of the country, in a few months she will call for new elections. Thanks to her, bloodshed and more violence were avoided. Janine Añez is the equivalent of Marjorie Taylor Green, so that you have a comparison, a brave woman, determined to fight at all costs for conservative principles. Evo Morales went into exile in Argentina, backed by his left-wing friends Fernandez and Kirchner, meanwhile he was preparing a new fraud. He could not get justice to enable him to stand for reelection again (he wanted to be for the 4th time, when a popular plebiscite had denied it) so, he put up a puppet, like Obama with Biden, and Luis Arce was elected president and began his term. in November 2020. Unfortunately, the patriot Jeanine Añez has been imprisoned for "terrorism and sedition" since March 12, 2021. In short, communism won in Bolivia.
Epilogue: In November 2019, on the brink of civil war when no one wanted to take over the hot potato, the brave conservative senator, Jeanine Añez, takes the interim presidency of the country, in a few months she will call for new elections. Thanks to her, bloodshed and more violence were avoided. Janine Añes is the equivalent of Marjorie Taylor Green, so that you have a comparison, a brave woman, determined to fight at all costs for conservative principles. Evo Morales went into exile in Argentina, backed by his left-wing friends Fernandez and Kirchner, meanwhile he was preparing a new fraud. He could not get justice to enable him to stand for reelection again (he wanted to be for the 4th time, when a popular plebiscite had denied it) so, he put up a puppet, like Obama with Biden, and Luis Arce was elected president and began his term. in November 2020. Unfortunately, the patriot Jeanine Añez has been imprisoned for "terrorism and sedition" since March 12, 2021. In short, communism won in Bolivia.
This is how Evo Morales committed electoral fraud in Bolivia OAS audit confirms forgery of signatures, manipulation of minutes and transmission systems. In several cities, up to 100% of the votes were awarded. The report of the Organization of American States (OAS), on the audit of the results of the process of last October 20, confirms that signatures were forged, minutes were manipulated and also data transmission systems. This is how Evo Morales committed electoral fraud in Bolivia.
The OAS confirmed the electoral fraud by concluding that "it is statistically improbable that Evo Morales obtained the 10% difference to avoid a second round."
The report details four relevant findings of the process, among which the use of a flawed data transmission system is confirmed.
On October 21, the Supreme Electoral Tribunal of Bolivia, with a day delay in announcing the results, gave Evo Morales the winner. The 24-hour stoppage in the official provisional count generated distrust in the results and harsh criticism against the electoral referee.
The results updated to 95% showed that Evo Morales reached 47% of the votes and surpassed by more than 10 percentage points Carlos Mesa, the strongest opposition candidate who participated with a political group called Comunidad Ciudadana.
This difference would make President Morales the winner in the first round and assured him a fourth consecutive term until 2025.
A day before, the same Electoral Court placed Evo with 45% and Mesa with 38%, figures that forced the president to seek his fourth term in the second round.
The electoral fraud unleashed a wave of violence and protests across the country. Evo Morales called for a dialogue, but the Bolivian opposition refused to sit at a table with the government. The armed forces announced that they would never confront their people and Evo Morales, cornered, resigned from the presidency and the elections will be repeated. HOW IT HANDLED DATA The OAS report indicates that, for the transmission of electoral results, “it is strange” that the flow of data has been redirected to a foreign network, neither foreseen nor documented. There is also no valid technical explanation why the edge servers controlled by the auditing company were not used. "This is extremely serious and affects the transparency of the process," the report highlights.
The OAS also confirms the falsification of signatures and alteration of minutes. The agency's technicians carried out a calligraphic expert analysis of 333 questioned records. To make up this sample, tables were selected in which Movimiento al Socialismo (MAS, Evo Morales' party) obtained 99% of the votes and consecutive tables, that is, those from the same voting center.
From the analysis carried out, it was concluded that 78 records (23% of the sample) presented irregularities from the expert point of view. In some cases, it was verified that all the records of the same center had been completed by the same person. On occasions, it was found that this person was the MAS representative accredited as a delegate at the center. Likewise, several minutes were found in which the ruling party obtained 100% of the votes.
“In some of these documents, the field corresponding to the votes of the opposition parties had not even been completed with a zero. In addition, the participation in some of these tables reached 100%, made practically impossible ”, adds the report. The OAS experts requested the original minutes and the materials used at the voting tables to deepen the expert study. Tables were detected in which the signatures of the original record did not correspond with the signatures of the copies. Likewise, a comparison was made between the signatures of the jurors that appeared in the minutes and those of the worksheets, which made it possible to detect cases in which the signatures in the six jurors' work records had been falsified.
Poor chain of custody was also used in electoral fraud. In a meeting with representatives of the nine Departmental Electoral Courts (TED), the OAS team learned about various post-electoral incidents caused by disturbances such as the burning of electoral facilities (TEDs and SERECI), looting in localities of political parties, and demonstrations.
Of these incidents, the partial burning of sensitive and non-sensitive material stands out in Chuquisaca, Beni, Pando, Potosí and Santa Cruz.
"Currently, there are no necessary chain of custody controls for sensitive electoral material," reports the EOA.
“The fact that there have been burned electoral records shows the lack of protection, of adequate provisions and little coordination of the TEDs with the security forces. Given that in Bolivia there is no possibility of counting the votes, the safeguarding of the electoral records is a critical aspect to give guarantees to the electoral process ”, they point out.
The OAS explains that the control of who handles the minutes and where they are at any given time is essential. When handling sensitive documentation, it is essential to verify absolutely everything that is irregular and out of the ordinary. The electoral authority must keep records that allow the traceability of documents, especially when there are unplanned aspects. This did not happen.
OAS DOES NOT KNOW VICTORIA DE EVO MORALES In the four elements reviewed (technology, chain of custody, integrity of the minutes, and statistical projections) the OAS found irregularities, ranging from very serious to indicative.
“This leads the technical audit team to question the integrity of the results of the election of last October 20. In the IT component, serious security flaws were discovered in both the TREP and the final computation systems. In addition, a clear manipulation of the TREP system was discovered that affected both the results of said system and those of the final calculation ”, confirm the international auditors. The existence of 1,575 TREP minutes in the final count, corresponds to an approximate of 350 thousand votes. The margin of victory in the first round is less than 40 thousand votes. Therefore, "an irregularity of these dimensions is decisive for the result." The OAS concludes that "the audit team cannot validate a victory in the first round" because the manipulations of the computer system are of such magnitude "that they must be thoroughly investigated by the Bolivian State to get to the bottom and define the responsibilities of this serious case ”.
https://www.despacho505.com/asi-cometio-evo-morales-el-fraude-electoral-en-bolivia/
That's from 2019. Morales was removed from power after blatant fraud trying to be reelected for 5th time, so in November 2019 a conservative female senator named Janine Añez, was the only who had the guts (Bolivian version of Boebert or Greene) to take the presidency. She called for new elections after pacifying the country (at the edge of a civil war), then after win elections, in November 2020, Morales' candidate, Luis Arce, is the new president. Añez is now in jail for "sedition" and the communism is back in power. She is a conservative martir. I'm tired of explain to Americans, also in this place, that Jeanine Añez is a conservative, she is not a fascist dictator as the media shows her. As I said, she is like Taylor Green taking the power tomorrow after proving Democrats fraud.
That's Bolivia, not Brazil.
That's from 2019. Morales was removed from power after blatant fraud trying to be reelected for 5th time, so in November 2019 a conservative female senator named Janine Añez, was the only who had the guts (Bolivian version of Boebert or Greene) to take the presidency. She called for new elections after pacifying the country (at the edge of a civil war), then after win elections, in November 2020, Morales' candidate, Luis Arce, is the new president. Añez is now in jail for "sedition" and the communism is back in power. She is a conservative martir. I'm tired of explain to Americans, also in this place, that Jeanine Añez is a conservative, she is not a fascist dictator as the media shows her. As I said, she is like Taylor Green taking the power tomorrow after proving Democrats fraud.
That's from 2019. Morales was removed from power after blatant fraud trying to be reelected for 5th time, so in November 2019 a conservative female senator named Janine Añez, was the only who had the guts (Bolivian version of Boebert or Greene) to take the presidency. She called for new elections after pacifying the country (at the edge of a civil war), then after win elections, in November 2020, Morales' candidate, Luis Arce, is the new president. Añez is now in jail for "sedition" and the communism is back in power. She is a conservative martir. I'm tired of explain to Americans, also in this place, that Jeanine Añez is a conservative, she is not a fascist dictator as the media shows her. As I said, she is like Taylor Green taking the power tomorrow after prove fraud. In fact, I forgot something, Evo Morales was losing the election, so exactly like here, they stop the counting at night, and then, a few hours later, he started winning! That sparked violence and protests all country wide (not like here, it looks like they had more guts) so that stopped the fraud. Anyway, they found the way to steal the election again in 2020 with Arce.
They discovered after the fall of the USSR, that the Romanovs girls were rapped several times by the communists before murdered them.
The idiot Biden is trying to blame the gun manufacturers when some active shooter kill several people. Is the same idiotic logic as blaming Boeing for 911.
I'm 55 years old, I had quadruple bypass surgery, my coronary arteries are clogged, I had two stents before the bypass surgery. I had the Johnson & Johnson vaccine almost a month ago. I just had some shivering and a I was a little tired for few hours, that's all. I had the vaccine because my brother is a doctor and he recommended me that one because is a conventional vaccine method. I think that story is fake.
That's why *we ain't no more *downtown tourism, because negros like you ruined everything, if you go to any big city downtown you get robbed, raped, shot, you can be caught in the middle of a riot, looting, etc.
LOL. You reminded me when we were at a Golden Corral, working on a steamer for about two hours, we moved it to the back section of the kitchen, there was a rack with several trays of chicken breasts, they took them from the walking freezer and just left them at the hallway, we left restaurant and the chicken breasts they still were there, t the I worked on several ice machines, disgusting, people drink sodas with ice, they don't have a clue how filthy are those ice machines.
Lol, I thought the same, chimps fighting!
The healthiest thing you can find in a restaurant kitchen is a Covid-19 virus. Fly with your imagination, from shit to semen, from roaches to rats. Anything is in a restaurant kitchen. That's why I don't go to restaurants after my experience as a kitchen equipment technician. The least of my worries will be a Wendy's employee not wearing mask.
I agree. In fact, people like "Rachel" Levine, (I don't remember his name) were in mental asylums, not in a government position. The Western world gone crazy, the Eastern cultures are the conservative and they will rule the future. Drugs and leftists ruined the Western world.
Because the level of corruption is so high, to the point that you can call the police when you suffer a robbery, because the cops will check what else you have and come next day in disguise. The Latin American countries where educated under the Catholic Church philosophy, the poor is good, the rich is evil. Also, they got ruled by the Spanish and Portuguese military, they were raping, stealing and destroying everything they could to satisfy the economical necessities of Spain and Portugal. America was populated by religious families who came here to establish a new world. Anyway, if we have the next 25 years of Democrat administrations, you'll have the answer too.
I will sound evil but from my experience, let me tell you. I'm from South America, these kids can look sad and weak, but in a second, they'll shoot you for a pair of shoes or in the future, when he gets older, he'll rape your daughter. Anyone with some common sense, even in their wildest thinking, won't leave a child alone in the desert or anywhere else. These Indians are savages, they were when the Europeans came to the Americas in 1500s and they still are, nothing changed. They are sending the kids because they know they won't be rejected so in the future, their parents will ask them to sponsor them to come to America.
I agree, they are the real racist. Same when they look at you like you are Hitler when you say Black people, they want you to say African American. Why? So you can say White people but saying Black is something bad? Also, African American can be a person from Tunisia, Algeria, Egypt, Libya, etc, and they are not Black skinned in their majority.
They want to eliminate the handshake from the planet because is one of the main symbols of Western Culture. I won't give up.
Crowder is crawling on his knees and begging to YouTube to keep him streaming, he disappointed me, he has no dignity, it's all about the money.
I'm not denying the Holocaust and the killing of innocent people during the Nazi regime. But, when I read this kind of stories like the wagon to hell, I remember the elites brainwashing people through media about Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Martin, ANTIFA, Hunter Biden, etc, etc and it makes me think if the elite of those times weren't exaggerating the Holocaust, the same way they exaggerate to the absurd Trump supporters.
1st. That's my "secondary or marketing" email address. 2nd. The day Crowder stop using YouTube by HIS decision and not begging to YouTube to let him stream and the day every other conservative "youtubers" stop using YouTube I'll stop using Gmail.
This is how Evo Morales committed electoral fraud in Bolivia OAS audit confirms forgery of signatures, manipulation of minutes and transmission systems. In several cities, up to 100% of the votes were awarded. The report of the Organization of American States (OAS), on the audit of the results of the process of last October 20, confirms that signatures were forged, minutes were manipulated and also data transmission systems. This is how Evo Morales committed electoral fraud in Bolivia.
The OAS confirmed the electoral fraud by concluding that "it is statistically improbable that Evo Morales obtained the 10% difference to avoid a second round."
The report details four relevant findings of the process, among which the use of a flawed data transmission system is confirmed.
On October 21, the Supreme Electoral Tribunal of Bolivia, with a day delay in announcing the results, gave Evo Morales the winner. The 24-hour stoppage in the official provisional count generated distrust in the results and harsh criticism against the electoral referee.
The results updated to 95% showed that Evo Morales reached 47% of the votes and surpassed by more than 10 percentage points Carlos Mesa, the strongest opposition candidate who participated with a political group called Comunidad Ciudadana.
This difference would make President Morales the winner in the first round and assured him a fourth consecutive term until 2025.
A day before, the same Electoral Court placed Evo with 45% and Mesa with 38%, figures that forced the president to seek his fourth term in the second round.
The electoral fraud unleashed a wave of violence and protests across the country. Evo Morales called for a dialogue, but the Bolivian opposition refused to sit at a table with the government. The armed forces announced that they would never confront their people and Evo Morales, cornered, resigned from the presidency and the elections will be repeated. HOW IT HANDLED DATA The OAS report indicates that, for the transmission of electoral results, “it is strange” that the flow of data has been redirected to a foreign network, neither foreseen nor documented. There is also no valid technical explanation why the edge servers controlled by the auditing company were not used. "This is extremely serious and affects the transparency of the process," the report highlights.
The OAS also confirms the falsification of signatures and alteration of minutes. The agency's technicians carried out a calligraphic expert analysis of 333 questioned records. To make up this sample, tables were selected in which Movimiento al Socialismo (MAS, Evo Morales' party) obtained 99% of the votes and consecutive tables, that is, those from the same voting center.
From the analysis carried out, it was concluded that 78 records (23% of the sample) presented irregularities from the expert point of view. In some cases, it was verified that all the records of the same center had been completed by the same person. On occasions, it was found that this person was the MAS representative accredited as a delegate at the center. Likewise, several minutes were found in which the ruling party obtained 100% of the votes.
“In some of these documents, the field corresponding to the votes of the opposition parties had not even been completed with a zero. In addition, the participation in some of these tables reached 100%, made practically impossible ”, adds the report. The OAS experts requested the original minutes and the materials used at the voting tables to deepen the expert study. Tables were detected in which the signatures of the original record did not correspond with the signatures of the copies. Likewise, a comparison was made between the signatures of the jurors that appeared in the minutes and those of the worksheets, which made it possible to detect cases in which the signatures in the six jurors' work records had been falsified.
Poor chain of custody was also used in electoral fraud. In a meeting with representatives of the nine Departmental Electoral Courts (TED), the OAS team learned about various post-electoral incidents caused by disturbances such as the burning of electoral facilities (TEDs and SERECI), looting in localities of political parties, and demonstrations.
Of these incidents, the partial burning of sensitive and non-sensitive material stands out in Chuquisaca, Beni, Pando, Potosí and Santa Cruz.
"Currently, there are no necessary chain of custody controls for sensitive electoral material," reports the EOA.
“The fact that there have been burned electoral records shows the lack of protection, of adequate provisions and little coordination of the TEDs with the security forces. Given that in Bolivia there is no possibility of counting the votes, the safeguarding of the electoral records is a critical aspect to give guarantees to the electoral process ”, they point out.
The OAS explains that the control of who handles the minutes and where they are at any given time is essential. When handling sensitive documentation, it is essential to verify absolutely everything that is irregular and out of the ordinary. The electoral authority must keep records that allow the traceability of documents, especially when there are unplanned aspects. This did not happen.
OAS DOES NOT KNOW VICTORIA DE EVO MORALES In the four elements reviewed (technology, chain of custody, integrity of the minutes, and statistical projections) the OAS found irregularities, ranging from very serious to indicative.
“This leads the technical audit team to question the integrity of the results of the election of last October 20. In the IT component, serious security flaws were discovered in both the TREP and the final computation systems. In addition, a clear manipulation of the TREP system was discovered that affected both the results of said system and those of the final calculation ”, confirm the international auditors. The existence of 1,575 TREP minutes in the final count, corresponds to an approximate of 350 thousand votes. The margin of victory in the first round is less than 40 thousand votes. Therefore, "an irregularity of these dimensions is decisive for the result." The OAS concludes that "the audit team cannot validate a victory in the first round" because the manipulations of the computer system are of such magnitude "that they must be thoroughly investigated by the Bolivian State to get to the bottom and define the responsibilities of this serious case ”.
In November 2019, on the brink of civil war when no one wanted to take over the hot potato, the brave conservative senator, Jeanine Añez, takes the interim presidency of the country, in a few months she will call for new elections. Thanks to her, bloodshed and more violence were avoided. Janine Añes is the equivalent of Marjorie Taylor Green, so that you have a comparison, a brave woman, determined to fight at all costs for conservative principles. Evo Morales went into exile in Argentina, backed by his left-wing friends Fernandez and Kirchner, meanwhile he was preparing a new fraud. He could not get justice to enable him to stand for reelection again (he wanted to be for the 4th time, when a popular plebiscite had denied it) so, he put up a puppet, like Obama with Biden, and Luis Arce was elected president and began his term. in November 2020. Unfortunately, the patriot Jeanine Añez has been imprisoned for "terrorism and sedition" since March 12, 2021. In short, communism won in Bolivia.