1
JhnBrwnRtrns 1 point ago +1 / -0

Absolutely nothing because it would be an interstate federal matter and the FBI is asshoe.

1
JhnBrwnRtrns 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can understand being on the fence. That's what a good, rational person should do. However, I don't see how you are still "having more and more reasonable doubt" and haven't concluded that this is a farce and the person who should be on trial is the drug dealer. That's where I've landed after the drug dealer that convinced him to swallow the pills to hide them pled the 5th.

1
JhnBrwnRtrns 1 point ago +2 / -1

I've seen his hair melt onstage.

Rudy is nothing more than a grifter. He rode the coattails long and hard.

1
JhnBrwnRtrns 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh, boy. I better brush up on my ebonics so I can start reading jogger posts.

1
JhnBrwnRtrns 1 point ago +1 / -0

The number does not exist. You cannot divide a number by zero.

1
JhnBrwnRtrns 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shut the fuck up and go back to milking your tiny pecker, loser. I've got better things to do than fucking explain to you how fucking stupid you are.

1
JhnBrwnRtrns 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not at all true. Perhaps read the Founding Fathers and understand that they desired a representative republic because they believed that the common man would not grasp all of the issues and required representation from people who could focus on and address those issues. This is laid out in detail in the Federalist Papers, which were intended to gain support from the People for the system of government that would be included in the US Constitution. Furthermore, the Federalist Papers described how our system of government is a balance between a centralized federal government and a federation of individual states. It is not one or the other.

So, no, you do not directly vote on hardly anything unless it's a local or state issue specifically placed on a ballot each year or every other year.

1
JhnBrwnRtrns 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hey, fren, it's what you wrote. Don't project your insecurities and failures onto me.

2
JhnBrwnRtrns 2 points ago +2 / -0

I know what you stated. It's right there in black and white: "We are democratic in that we all have a vote for any given issue." No need for me to make any assumptions. If you can't deal with what you wrote, then maybe the internet isn't for you.

1
JhnBrwnRtrns 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looks like a bunch of fags wishing and dreaming for this to be true. You guys need to wake the fuck up and get real. You are no better than the shills on the left. Be led to slaughter, little sheep.

1
JhnBrwnRtrns 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's interesting...

0
JhnBrwnRtrns 0 points ago +1 / -1

Brilliant counter argument from someone who lacks higher reasoning skills.

2
JhnBrwnRtrns 2 points ago +2 / -0

No we aren't. Perhaps in the modern sense of the term that has been warped by people wanting to give you the notion that you have direct power over what your government does. The classical definition of democracy is not the same as the representative republic in which we live.

1
JhnBrwnRtrns 1 point ago +1 / -0

How about "Constitution-Minded"?

1
JhnBrwnRtrns 1 point ago +1 / -0

Understood. I'm not watching it. I'm just taking the feed from posts here and elsewhere. Important that factual information gets to people.

1
JhnBrwnRtrns 1 point ago +1 / -0

That doesn't show up in this video clip, so perhaps a different video clip would be more appropriate.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›