Sounds like Lin Wood may well get his way and hand the Senate over to the Democrats, so that they can Pack the Courts and Kill the Filibuster. Clever of him, though, to tell us conservatives not to vote next month, so we can 'teach the GOP a lesson' (for not fighting for Trump hard enough).
Sounds like were listening to him!
Interesting. Most of what the CIA is doing these days is taking advantage in a loophole in our 4th Amendment, where the US government can't spy on Americans (at least on American soil) without good justification...but nothing stops the other countries of the 5 Eyes from spying on Americans, and then giving their 'intelligence' to the CIA and other American agencies.
But if Trump cuts off their contacts...hmmm, will be interesting.
"Leftists don't care about logical consistency, in fact they couldn't care less."
Very true, and in fact, they don't even need consistency, given their media power...it never happened, just like the Atlanta vote counting never stopped on election night.
When we try that, we get called out, every time, as we should (by the way).
I think even the Left is SHOCKED by our tepid response. If I was in the position of prominent Republicans, and getting censored by their platforms, AT A MINIMUM I would be filing lawsuit after lawsuit, based on the fact that they're effectively monopolies and/or they are electioneering.
But no - all we did say: "That's not fair"
Or at least the justification (as if we needed anymore) to simply IGNORE the federal laws and directives we don't like, that come out of DC.
...of course that likely leads to what you're saying, and probably sooner than later.
The FIRST THING that Texas and other states looking at pulling out needs to do is FIX their voting systems, clean them up! And that starts by throwing EVERYONE off of the voter roles, and then making each of them petition to get back on: "Oh, you want to vote, then prove you were a citizen before Jan 21, 2021." And the rest (prove you live in Texas, link up databases to IDs and DLs, etc. After the above date, then Texas sets its OWN RULES for what qualified for voting. If Biden wants to give voting rights to 30 Million illegals, fine, but not in Texas.
I'm still pissed at how he treated Trump in the 2016 convention...considering that the alternative, who nearly won (due in part to his help in suppressing conservative turnout), was Hillary. And I think that was a big part of his near-loss of his seat in 2018. I still voted for him then, but only because the line to get in was short that day.
But I am, after 4+ years, FINALLY ready to fully forgive him, if he puts together a good case, which I do expect, given his experience.
The relatives there know they'll likely never see their loved ones again.
Our future if we hand the Senate to the Democrats. First they'll effectively disarm us (and don't fool yourselves, if they have uncontested power, they can do it), and then they'll finish the job on us, in a similar way to this video.
If you want to know if your post is shadow-banned, simply open a second browser of a different type (like Chrome, if you use Firefox), and DO NOT log-in to that second browser. Then, if you see your comment, you're good, if not, you're shadow-banned. A further check is to check on a different device on a different platform - so if they've shadow-banned you via IP Address, you'll have a completely different one (although I haven't seen that type of shadow-banning).
In other words, you can check yourself, without relying on Karma, responses, or anything else.
Without repeating the derivation, here are the approximate odds that it was 'just an accident' at this critical time: 1 in 1000
And now here are the odds that it wasn't a typical (random) accident: 999/1000
In other words, while fatal accidents certainly do happen, they're rare enough to arouse suspicion if they manage to hit just the right people, at just the right time.
Just doing the simple math here: In the US, about one in every 10,000 people die in an auto accident every year. So if you (somehow) have 10,000 people close to you, you'll lose one every year. Likewise if you only have 100 people close to you, your odds of losing one of them in a car crash is 1 in 100, or 1%. 100 people might be a large, extended family - and if they get together for a gathering once a year, it will be very unlikely that they will have lost anyone that year (again 1%). Anyone with a large family or a large circle of friends knows it is still very rare to lose any in car crash in a given year. So, here we are. Figure that the Senators, plus the governor, have 100 people (total) who they are personally close to. So 1% that one of them dies in a car crash in 2020...and that's for a year. But we're talking about 1/10th of a year (post-election time frame). So 1 in a 1000 chance of losing someone close for those three.
Bottom line - random car crash odds 1 in a 1000; Something intentional that caused the car crash: 999 in 1000.
Tell me where I'm wrong please.
Yea, our strategy seems to be that since the Dems got away with big-time cheating against Trump, and we don't like cheating, we're going to eliminate the need to cheat and help the Marxists win OUTRIGHT!!!
...and we think they're idiots?
Agree - Breitbart is not even close to being compromised. The people who are COMPROMISED are the people on THIS SITE, called The Donald, who are willing to listen to and take orders from shyster lawyer telling them to do exactly OPPOSITE of what President Trump wants us to do.
Sorry guys, but I still don't see how it helps us to let the Dems win the Senate races outright (without needing to cheat), and then using that power, kill off the Second Amendment. Is our (well justified) anger at these GOP Traitors really worth that outcome, to us, and to our children?