Are you going to give me legit cites to those articles so I can find and read them? I think I found the last one. If I'm right it was retracted because the authors were incompetent.
I sniggered when I read this. It'd be easier to dance a super complicated Irish jig than reprogram all this. I bet this spooks programmers to no end. I'd rather wear a coon-skin cap and go be Davy Crockett for the rest of my life than deal with this shit on my IT systems.
The problem is you have to get merchants to accept Trumpcard. Hint: They wont.
The smart way to do this would be to start multiple credit unions, one for Trump people, one for Bernie people, one for Biden people, one for pathetic Mitt Romney faggots, etc. Then make a joint application to Visa and Mastercard. That would give you your highest chance of success.
So go do a better study and get your second Nature authorship credit. Hell that's enough for tenure at a lot of colleges.
Based and Pepepilled
It would be 100% legal. "Non-Trump supporter" is not a protected class like "black" or "cripple" or "faggot" therefore it is legal to discriminate against non-Trump supporters.
I hope our side strongly supports anyone who tried to do this. I would move all my accounts to a Trump supporter-only credit union or bank in a heartbeat.
Expect to be fucked by Visa and Mastercard though.
You are 100% right about sunlight operating as an antimicrobial disinfectant. Being outside also helps because there's no recirculated air.
The most effective ways to fight coronavirus are:
- Wear a surgical mask or better.
- Avoid maskless people at all costs.
- Stay outside in the sun as much as possible.
- Avoid recirculated air as much as possible.
- Do not touch your face, especially your eyes.
- Wash hands with soap and hot water regularly or at least regularly use an ethanol or propyl alcohol disinfectant.
- Stay far away from anyone who is coughing or sneezing.
- Avoid communities that have a disproportionate number of coronavirus cases: old people, sick people, unhygenic poors, leftist rioters, etc.
I'm sure this study was done and written up on an extremely expedited basis due to the emergency nature of the coronavirus pandemic. I agree that it could have been written up better and I can think of a few ways they could have improved their experimental design, but you can't expect perfection in an emergency. Hell what I just wrote is equally applicable to most studies done on a non-emergency basis.
Nature obviously published it because whatever its flaws in design and write-up, it's the best evidence we presently have as to whether surgical masks inhibit transmission of coronavirus. Policymakers like Greg Abbott should therefore rely on it until some better study is performed and published.
That's how science works. That's how public health works. And that's how politics is supposed to work. And if you are a scientist (and I have no reason to doubt you), you know I'm right.
Beyond all that game theory also dictates people wear masks until we know for sure they are not effective. They're obviously harmless to everyone who has been mandated to wear them and they are extremely cheap. Even if they don't ultimately help, there is probable cause to believe they might, and they are so cheap that there's no reason not to mandate them.
We should all be wearing masks for the same reason Trump was right about hydroxychloroquine. They're virtually harmless and they might help a whole lot. We should therefore use them unless and until they've been proven useless. That's how wise decision-makers operate.
Umm ok? So what?
Jesus, learn how to cite a study. How am I supposed to figure out what you're citing from this? Do I need to send you an APA manual? Hell I'll even accept MLA, Bluebook, or Chicago.
You can't even spell the word "shill" yet you think you're smart enough to make decisions about fighting a global viral pandemic?
Maximum fucking keks.
KEK you are a Grade A Dunning-Kruger dumbass. I destroyed you but you're so dumb you think I somehow made your point for you.
Read this: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123855220000056
He fucked with Trump over the inspector general firings. Grassley is not our friend.
Just by looking at the downvotes, it seems nobody likes you.
I've gotten tons of direct messages from people who agree with me and appreciate my posts but don't want to say anything in a public post because you and your Mask Derangement Syndrome buddies will shout them down, call them communists, and try to get them banned--all of which you folks have tried to do to me. They just avoid the whole thing because you all are a fucking mob.
When you turn into a mob, don't be surprised when your opponents become relatively silent. They still disagree with you, they just don't tell you. That doesn't work on me because I don't care what you do to me. But you should know that a lot of other people on The Donald.win agree with me 100% but are choosing to remain silent to avoid being fucked with by the FACE MASKS BAD mob.
- Learn how to spell "shill."
- Learn what "shill" means. It doesn't mean "Someone who disagrees with me."
- The mask debate is the only interesting debate going on here right now. If you can find something else that interests me, I'll be glad to talk about it too.
Stop posting proof that I'm wrong, bro
KEK!
Only a lunatic is "antagonized" by people who think surgical masks should be worn in public during a global virus-aerosol pandemic. Wearing a mask is no more "harmful" to the wearer than wearing pants.
“Controlled” studies are far from real life situations.
You can't do a "real life situation" here because of research ethics. This ain't Nazi Germany, Dr. Mengele. You can't legally do the experiment where you put two groups of uninfected people with two infected people, one of whom is wearing a mask and one of whom isn't. The reason you can't do this is that Kung Flu is a deadly disease, and you can't willfully expose uninfected people to a deadly disease.
The study done here --> https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0843-2#auth-14 <-- is the best study that can be legally done. It showed that mask wearing dramatically decreased the amount of coronavirus-infected aerosols in the air around the sick person.
That's the closest thing we can possibly get to proof that masks work given modern research ethics requirements. If coronavirus wasn't deadly we could do a lot more research, but that's not the case.
Learn how science works before running your mouth about it.
What exactly am I shilling? Do you even know what the word "shill" means?
You're scared of a deadly disease? You're a pussy bro!
KEK what are you, a caveman?
GOP senator chases tail. Lindsey Graham plays the same game. They always pretend to do these investigations but they never actually force the issue and uncover something.
Exactly why mask requirements in Texas need to be enforced. Laws need to be followed.
KEK do you honestly think Greg Abbott was bribed by Big Mask?
This may be the funniest thing I've ever read on the Internet.
I've been to Cleveland a few times. I suggest the Cleveland Loud-Mouthed Beer-Gutted Opiate-Addicted Yankees. You know, to distinguish them from the New York Yankees. We don't need a Canadian Football League Roughriders/RoughRiders fiasco.