3
Jimmyprawns 3 points ago +3 / -0

This, Army's all about not letting grunts use issued sleep gear. Forget allowing such a luxurious pillow. But if Mike can get them there, and get the big guy or one of his pals to make a dick move, that's an even bigger win.

3
Jimmyprawns 3 points ago +3 / -0

This, people have conveniently forgotten how much pressure was on bush the junior to do it. In Feb and Mar nobody was pushing harder for an invasion if iraq than the main stream media. Fast forward to november of 2003 (invasion was mid March) and the media was nothing but none stop crying about was an ass bush was for doing what everyone wanted at the time.

If anyone lied in that period it was the media. Blame Bush all you want for going along, but he was not dragging anyone into anything. Once it turned into a no shit boots on the ground shooting war, instead of a round 2 of desert storm laser tag, everyone's tune changed.

Just like the media drooling over afghanistan and the women's right opportunities there just after 911. Now they can't do enough to defend mideast abuses of women.

2
Jimmyprawns 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup hard to tell when the actual screwing took place. Papa Bush or the clintons. It would seem we are only now becoming aware of a reality that started back then.

A book called "year of the rat" tried to draw attention to what the clintons were doing for china, back in the 90's. Crickets. I still say Bill taking advantage of an intern is what saved the administration. The devil really does take care of his own. That was another time R's had a chance to do something meaningful and didn't, because, 'muh optics.'

The cold war was only half finished in 91 and instead of helping to rebuild russian and eastern europe,we let the carpetbaggers run in there and fan the flames of a weimar situation that ultimately gave rise to Putin's kleptocracy.

China hadnt ended its cold war antagonism towards us and was not yet finished off. Yet we did all the economic rebuilding, technology, and cash infusions there. Instead of where it could have done some good. We saved a failing communist regime.

It was as if WWII Germany had been totally defeated and the politicians just up and said, "that's it, wars over.". Without finishing the fight with japan

And then immediately, without any social or governmental change in Japan, started sending money and advisors to help rebuild Japan. Meanwhile, a ravaged Germany left to the jackals.

Only to have another dictator rise and take the helm. A dictator the Dems immediately began to fawn over once Putin's true colors were showing. Then they tried a short term projection trick on trump that caused a few unintended consequences that are still in effect 4yrs later.

They seem to follow the mantra that making reality messy enough causes lazy people to accept an easy to understand fictional universe.

3
Jimmyprawns 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thier constituents have so little will of thier own, they listen to the party when they want to know what to think.

11
Jimmyprawns 11 points ago +11 / -0

And this is why the social media got shut down. It's the only way the masses would have found out.

Also, "people want to believe lies that hurt the people they envy". We talk alot about how unhappy and miserable the leftists are but we often forget about the envy.

They believe things that cause them to do damage to themselves and to thier lives. They envy people who didn't get tricked into damaging themselves and thier lives. And think we should be forced to suffer too.

Quote is from a book by Richard McKenna.

8
Jimmyprawns 8 points ago +8 / -0

Politicians aren't in it for the job they're in it for the title. Once they have the title they sell that shit like a sports whore on a wheaties box.

More specifically, a republican gets paid by promising to get in the way of democrats. If by chance they do get in the way they let someone pay them to get back out of the way.

2
Jimmyprawns 2 points ago +2 / -0

They have represented conservatives about as well as the race baiters have represented the black community. Fancy speeches and empty promisses immediately followed by submission to the democrats.

2
Jimmyprawns 2 points ago +2 / -0

We have found in your possession unapproved VHS dated pre 2022. All household media subject to monthly review and disposal if not approved title and publication date. All home alone copies sold before 2022 were to be destroyed by approved method or turned in to local library for government disposal. You have failed to adequately review titles in your possession to ensure compliance. You are herby sentenced, 10 years in media free camp.

Streaming of government curated content is only recommended form of entertainment. Only person's or entities with curator's license may download, store and or review locally stored media content. You are now banned from holding such license for remainder of life.

2
Jimmyprawns 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mafia and union were not a safe crowd to run with. Ivy Leaguers are pretty good at getting in over thier heads when they try to hang out with the 'tough guys'. Certain things you just don't do, they think they're smart enough to do.

2
Jimmyprawns 2 points ago +2 / -0

As well as dewey vs truman. During that election it was the polling that proved more accurate than the vote counting. It was bad enough to out the pendergast political machine and break it up. But truman still got to play president.

4
Jimmyprawns 4 points ago +4 / -0

The trust element is key. There was a vid during the obama admin, wherein an executive head hunter explained that the process for electing president is anathema to the process for selecting a CEO. Inherently favoring the last person on earth we should invest that level of trust in. Ironic we should see, essentially a vetted CEO, buck that selection process and show results.

Throughout the Obama years, we lamented about the presidency. Perhaps now we all realize just how important ALL elected positions are. Right down to the county clerk and the comptroller, whatever that is. If they're all dirty, none of it matters.

It's hard enough to clean up a business in trouble if it's only a handful of crap employees causing the trouble. When it's only a handful doing the work and even fewer who can be trusted without supervision, it's nigh impossible.

1
Jimmyprawns 1 point ago +1 / -0

Guess they don't consider trump supporters a terror threat worth tracking. Just an ideological threat worth silencing. That whole constitutionalism thing is dangerous you know.

2
Jimmyprawns 2 points ago +2 / -0

He is likely nothing more than a conquest to her. Now she resents him for making it harder for her to achieve another conquest.

He is now her ball and chain.

1
Jimmyprawns 1 point ago +1 / -0

Single income families are a luxury of the rich, but socially acceptable only if the woman does absolutely nothing around the house or with the kids. They have to live the life of a spoiled teenager sans having to follow any rules. Sometimes they run a virtue signal charity the husband can launder money with, so there is that.

1
Jimmyprawns 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's like joining a gang, nobody trusts you till they've all seen you commit a felony.

view more: Next ›