It doesn’t matter when the protest happened. They had no plan to stand up for the election. Every statement leading up to the electoral vote was political theatrics to appease the population. Trump asking people to show up in DC was a show of force. The media/world can no longer pretend that POTUS has lost the support of the people.
Haven’t seen the long version yet but there’s a snippet in the 4 minute version where Trump says with 150k+ illegal votes can’t we find 15,000 votes somewhere. He’s ignoring the first half of the argument and taking the 15ish thousand vote comment out of context.
That QR code guy from the last Georgia senate hearing was asked to inspect the Fulton County Ballots last night. Moving trucks came and took the ballots in the 4 hr window after he was given access. He did a podcast interview last night but I can’t find the link
That QR code guy from the Georgia senate hearing was supposed to get the ballots yesterday to check for counterfeits. He stated on a radio interview last night that moving trucks were brought in to pick up ballots in the 4 hr window before he got access
I’m not arguing that google is “better” from an ethical standpoint. Google does lots of shady shit but they have the most advanced search aggregator from a technical standpoint. Every result is catered to the individual user based on location, bounce rate, click through rate, time on page, and past search history.
It’s scary to think about how much google knows about you. They know everywhere you go (geolocation), where you spend money, and people you associate with. All of that info is sold to advertisers and anybody else that’s willing to pay
I don’t know much about yandex search since most of my work revolves around analyzing and optimizing data for google.
Bots can’t actually see what’s in the image. That’s why websites use captcha images to figure out if a person is human.
When you click on the images and read the meta tags it seems like yandex has a simplistic search function that’s open to manipulation. That’s what allows the spammy Russian image aggregation sites to slip through.
Google has a list of 100+ different ranking factors to determine where things rank. They use titles, headlines, alt tags, keyword density, click thru rate, etc to figure out where things should rank. That works well with popular search terms but there’s not enough data for long tale keywords like this one.
They took an original article with traffic/authority from search engine algorithms and updated it with new information. It uses the previous pages age/authority and gives it a temporary boost in search rankings over brand new posts. You can go in and manually update the time but that would negatively impact google rankings.