2
JohnCocktoastin 2 points ago +2 / -0

And the students in Hibbing's class are forced to buy Hibbing's book as part of it. This is indoctrination at its finest.

3
JohnCocktoastin 3 points ago +3 / -0

It was a fake news NYT classic "McConnell privately admitted supporting impeachment according to sources familiar with their thinking" or some other bogus bullshit they do. Any time there are not names and direct quotes, 100% chance fake news.

1
JohnCocktoastin 1 point ago +1 / -0

they do. Nebraska district 2 went biden based on totally horse shit voting out of Sarpy county. Those numbers are obviously bogus.

2
JohnCocktoastin 2 points ago +2 / -0

The football program sure looks like democrats have been in charge of it for the last 20 years.

1
JohnCocktoastin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Another interesting tidbit: Democrats ate their own when it came to Sasse's opponent this November. They pretty much disavowed him for what is ordinarily a routine democrat resume enhancement - naughty texts with campaign staffers. They never could persuade him to step down in time to get someone else on the ballot. They just told everyone not to vote for him.

I always thought Nebraska Democrats were just morons and completely disorganized. But this looks more like organized make sure Sasse doesn't have an opponent to shoe him in type of move. Perhaps in exchange for district 2?

1
JohnCocktoastin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe. But lets take what we can get. How about we get a dumbass like Cheney out of a position of leadership and install a non dumbass? That is better than a kick in the nuts. We have to stop this "everything we do is useless cuz muh rigged election" shit. One step at a time. To quote another dumbass, Don Rumsfeld said "You go to war with the army you got, not the army you wish you had."

1
JohnCocktoastin 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think they can keep it. AOC was keeping her cash away from DNC. Not sure how that works though.

2
JohnCocktoastin 2 points ago +2 / -0

That probably explains why they never allowed this to be presented publicly during the objections. This was dated Jan 5 and likely part of the show they were going to put on till the capitol was taken over.

1
JohnCocktoastin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Never get a defamation case without a specific claim made against a specific person. Might be able to get some kinda of oddball way tortious interference type of claim.

The best lawsuit will be the shareholders of big tech against management and the board for egregious mismanagement causing the tanking of shareholder value. I’ll really enjoy that one.

4
JohnCocktoastin 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ya, we could just seize the capitol by force, and declare dear leader another 4 years and that would fix things. That was sure his plan. Did you eat paint chips?

1
JohnCocktoastin 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can vouch for this. It's legit. Like the $3 Clinton bill. And big foot. I saw it. Its real.

1
JohnCocktoastin 1 point ago +1 / -0

proof chuck norris fucked kurt russell?

3
JohnCocktoastin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Letter is useless. Fuckers could have simply certified alternate electors and decertified biden electors. Was a game of pass the buck and ultimately got us a big shafting.

1
JohnCocktoastin 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's a slimey piece of shit. But everything reporting this is citing a NYT article that cites classic fake news "sources close to their thinking" bullshit.

2
JohnCocktoastin 2 points ago +2 / -0

If it doesn't support the narrative, it doesn't come out until people have stopped giving a shit. We ought to up the pressure and force this out ASAP. Of course, it aint' coming soon. But we ought to try.

1
JohnCocktoastin 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've seen zero cctv footage. I have seen a lot of footage of police letting people in and guiding them. I've also seen what looks like police and antifa LARPing around inside. Prove there was a real riot and not a LARP'd false flag. Release the cctv footage. The capitol has shitloads of cams.

1
JohnCocktoastin 1 point ago +1 / -0

a few have said so. The rest are the classic "According to sources close to their thinking" fake news NYT quotes.

2
JohnCocktoastin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are they quoting "sources familiar with their thinking" or again quoting the NYT? This is classic fake news tactics. "XXX privately supports YYY according to persons familiar with their thinking" and then turns out to be a LARP.

view more: Next ›