1
JohnCocktoastin 1 point ago +1 / -0

90%…that is insane. So this is how they counter Election Day heavy voting…sabotage. Hopefully they do not get away with this

2
JohnCocktoastin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ya, he looks like Anthony Robbins and Buffalo Bill had a kid.

2
JohnCocktoastin 2 points ago +2 / -0

The entire story stinks like a hang out. It basically is a misleading larp to distract from the real issues by admitting some less damning ones. That was honestly my first read on the story when it came out. I am trying to go with my gut these days…it is way more accurate than my second guessing.

15
JohnCocktoastin 15 points ago +15 / -0

What is more likely is that they are withholding votes. Because they cannot ratio Hobbs to victory without that. Otherwise, the turnout numbers to simply insert hobbs votes looks insane.

Look for significantly different turnout rates. There will be a mean and a median turnout percentage by precinct. The ones that are significantly higher than the mean will be where they stuff. Some of the lower end will be where they skim.

3
JohnCocktoastin 3 points ago +3 / -0

I am unsure about this. The election judge that is speaking out said they actually tested them the night before and they worked. Suddenly they didn't. Then called dominion to come fix it. Said they rebooted them and they suddenly worked.

I wasn't there, I can't say if they tested it appropriately. But a reboot "fixing" it doesn't sound right. What else doesn't sound right? Nobody on site that didn't work for dominion but were involved in the election did not consider rebooting the machine. You should not need tech support to restart.

6
JohnCocktoastin 6 points ago +6 / -0

Mark my words, they already began planning this. It will be John Thune. You heard it here first. And there's no difference between the 2.

1
JohnCocktoastin 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you want to see not possible, look up last year's Omaha mayoral election. They apparently publish all their turnout data, which is how I found it when I was looking into the district 2 bullshit from 2020.

A few thousand more democrats turned out than republicans in that election for Mayor. Yet somehow the Republican mayor gets 63% of the vote?? In what world is that possible? To do so, she would have to get 100% of Reps, 100% of third parties, 100% of independents, and still need like 17% of democrats to vote for here. Meaning, no fuckin way it happened.

Then I notice down the highway in Lincoln, where they have a republican registration advantage over democrats, they've gone full chairman mao with a commie mayor and a 6:1 city council made up of commies.

Fraud hub is Nebraska. Chuck hagel winning senate on the machines from his own company is the tell. He never told anyone he owned a voting machine company. That company is still in Bellview.

1
JohnCocktoastin 1 point ago +1 / -0

The only thing wrong with your theory is that if it were true, they wouldn’t drag this shit out and look like rigging morons in the process. All eyes are on them. Even the left doesn’t believe them now. This is 3 stooges level buffoonery. And sociopathic level gas lighting from the election heads there.

2
JohnCocktoastin 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was trying to use a spread sheet to calculate outcomes as the data came in. Like how many votes are left based on reported counts and what ratios would lead to what vote difference. I couldn’t make it work. Then I realized its a damn function and not a linear equation. Hence why I was an idiot. And its been about 20 years since i made a function. Thinking I’ll get the ole calculus book back out and brush up. That would be useful re-learning.

2
JohnCocktoastin 2 points ago +2 / -0

I want to know where I can get the raw data. And where I can get it in real time during elections. If I could get that, it would be easy to graph. Then a guy can back up his graph with the raw data and let derps tell him he’s fabricated it. While I don’t doubt this, the raw feed data should be posted with it.

4
JohnCocktoastin 4 points ago +5 / -1

I am suspect of all pols. Desantis has a damn good track record as governor. He has none as president. We know what we got with Trump. We have no idea what we will get with DeSantis in higher office. G.W. Bush seemed pretty solid as Texas governor. We see how that worked out…

The fact that the media is pushing this makes me even more suspicious of the guy. If the media is a cheerleader, I am against it. That is #1 rule of clown world.

13
JohnCocktoastin 13 points ago +16 / -3

Ya, fuck Mastriano for being the only state rep to give a fuck about rampant rigging and fraud in PA’s 2020 election. That’s what Q-tards believe. Real geniuses know that election was totally legit. And PA can totally have confidence that the half wit hunch back will even find the correct button to vote with the radical left every time. Maybe they’ll just block out the “incorrect” button for him every time so he can’t fuck up. But that doesn’t mean he will find his way to the floor to push it.

I wish Mitt Romney would move to PA and run for governor. His acceptance of Brandon’s legitimate win actually aroused me…nearly to full release… And that is exactly what PA voters are looking for. Not these fags that undermine Our Democracy™ with election denialism.

2
JohnCocktoastin 2 points ago +2 / -0

I almost wouldn’t believe the DeSantis numbers. Is approaching Gavin Newsome numbers. And I certainly don’t trust those. You’d like to believe that people aren’t insane or stupid and they support how he has governed the state the last few years. But how the hell did he win Palm Beach county??

Yes, plenty of corruption and rigging exists in the state. But did they rig for him instead of against him? I have a hard time imagining that a couple of statutes and a task force that has only existed for a short time magically undid the rig in that state. It is at least suspicious to me. Especially in the context of the narrative you’re describing.

2
JohnCocktoastin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Something has got to give. I can't imagine how they sustain this without doing our work for us. There has to be a lot of wtf out there among those who dont buy the 2020 fraud. But...so what? If nothing happens except more people know, they will simply keep cinching down the power strings right under our nose and stick it to us while we all know its bullshit. This is not good in the least.

3
JohnCocktoastin 3 points ago +3 / -0

I saw this. Good for them. I also saw a dem was dangerously close to stealing district 2. Looks like good showing across the board in Nebraska otherwise.

2
JohnCocktoastin 2 points ago +2 / -0

What they have on tap for AZ can't possibly fly, can it? Like that exceeds the shit they pulled in 2020. Set to have 7 of 9 house seats, kelly and hobbs win? Really? Do they think everyone is retarded or do they just not care?

2
JohnCocktoastin 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is some egregious horse shit, dude. I am without words. Across the nation 90% horse shit. Only positive news is Florida. Everything else is causing me to burp up 2020 memories again.

7
JohnCocktoastin 7 points ago +8 / -1

Looks like we got an antivaxxx transphobic bigoted climate change and $cience denying misogynist homophobic white supremacist patriarch putin puppet conspiracy theorist misinformation peddler here, pedes

1
JohnCocktoastin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Historically, midterms are about 15- 20% less turnout than presidential election years. If you got 50-60% turnout in the presidential election, you might get 40-50% in the midterms. 2.3 million votes is almost 34% less. About 170% higher than the high end of expectations. PA had 5 a tad over 5 million votes in the 2018 election. That was allegedly the highest turnout for midterms in a generation. That was supposed to be 58% turnout. Which is near presidential election turnout, save for the abomination known as 2020.

view more: Next ›