Didn't you guys hear about that one church that was set on fire? They aren't promoting BLM, they're hoping that the arsonists will spare the building when they see the BLM flag
It looks like some snowflakes actually started a change.org petition to have Obama invoke this order to prevent Trump from becoming President. Sounds like it's fair for us to use it now...
And yet we're supposed to believe that Biden got 100% of the military vote in Fulton county...
What I want to know is, where's the evidence?!
"Oh that? Is that what you're calling evidence? Nah that's not evidence, it's all been debunked."
Two can play this game, you wanna play, let's play!
There is an exemption for those who are traveling to their place of residence; therefore, the phrase to remember is "I'm driving home, officer." (Section 1f)
Game, set, match...the Supreme Court precedents being quoted here undeniably prove the defendant States usurped their respective legislatures in a way that violates the Elections Clause of the US Constitution.
While Texas did include evidence of election fraud in its initial filing, the Supreme Court has enough to kick the results back to the State legislatures on this fact alone. (The voter fraud evidence is a bonus and, I think was placed there in anticipation of the defendant States' rebuttals)
Reading this Amicus brief sounds just like the DNC talking points about how we had an unarguably "free and fair election"... plus, they seriously citied Washington Post articles as proof that Texas' perspective is incorrect.
Watching this Supreme Court case play out will be quite literally a blood bath if these guys don't come up with an original perspective
Not sure if sincere or troll...the liberal line to those in blue collar jobs on the liberal chopping block is "learn to code"
What I keep waiting for is another bunker buster MOAB to be deployed like the one we used to knock out ISIS
Too little, too late. I want to see him nailed to a cross for what he's done
What's at least a little redeeming is that she's getting ratioed for it, but it's concerning because this is what our "elected" leaders are thinking
Hmm right around the same time a Democratic mayor in KY was arrested for DUI...it seems the Democrats may be panicking after all
That's scary how fast you were able to find that website. Thanks!
Yeah something like that, but with more context about some of those vertices. I'll check out that site and see if they've published more than the graph
Sorry buddy, can't do that - warming yourself with big furs is animal cruelty, didn't you know? ... /s
I think we're splitting hairs here; even you recognize that, while there's plenty of different "clean room" implementations, they are all advertised and described as a clean room
As a computer IT pede, I can tell you that this is more science fiction than science.
A copy of the hard drive would be acceptable, as long as the copy was created correctly. Nothing would be ascertainable by looking at the molecules of the hard drive; in fact, just opening one up and exposing the platters would cause irrecoverable data loss unless the drive was in a clean room.
Hard drives store data as a series of 1s and 0s its the platters and these bits are represented by magnetic polarities + and -. There is nothing at the molecular level to distinguish between these states.
Furthermore, file metadata (like creation time, last modified time, and file permissions) are all encapsulated within the file system, and are not maintained by the hard drive itself. A hard drive is configured with a file system when a user "Formats" a drive and this file system tells the operating system (Windows, OSX, etc) how to store and access files on the drive. The file system data is stored on the hard drive just like all other data so things like file creation time would also be included in a forensic copy of any hard drive.
Now that we know all data is stored on the hard drive platters as + and - magnetic polarities, we can conclude that all data found on "the hard drive" would also be found on its discs because that's the only place any data would exist so matching this up with the files on the machine would be completely unnecessary.
Some caveats for the technically inclined pedes and why they don't matter here:
- Yes, very smart people can actually hide data on a hard drive by artificially marking a hard drive sector as "bad"
- We don't need to worry about this because the forensic community is aware of this well known technique to hide data and will have accounted for this possibility when they make their forensic copy.
- Really, really smart people can store data in the hsrd drive's firmware that would not otherwise be accessible by the operating system
- We don't have to worry about this because for one, these guys really aren't that smart (I mean come on, open sourcing your election stealing application?!?!) and two, if they actually did this (which I can guarantee you they didn't) they would have to create a custom application to read this extremely well hidden data. And, since we would have a copy of every application on the system, we can find out, through reverse engineering, if any of their applications were programed to make these very custom data accesses
I'm going to call BS on this one for 2 reasons:
- Google would never allow its search algorithm to produce this result even if it were true
- Because every hit literally references TDW, the most likely reason would be because you searched for "site:thedonald.win" then replaced the search query with "news" and screenshoted it without pressing Enter
Gotcha, yeah I heard about that and it took me a bit to realize they were separate
No worries at all and thanks for the update! I agree that they should be looking at this election (rather than just focusing on future ones) but it definitely sounds like a win when we are able to convince them that these results are not on the up and up
While I like the confidence, I was hoping to hear about something specific. Did the committee make a ruling or a decision today?
Unfortunately I was unable to listen to today's hearing. Does anyone know how it ended?
I'm curious to find out how this fits into the rest of the chess game the President has going. I agree with others when they say this is definitely not something someone who's about to leave office would do
My first thought was "What the fuck is that thing?!"
My second thought: "Huh, I guess the coneheads are back"
What I don't understand is how do the shills come to the conclusion that the number of times a lie is posted correlates to how true it is...
"Yeah guys, posted the same thing 10 times, therefore it must be true!" - All Shills Ever
You forgot about one very important rule: Never fuck crazy. I wouldn't fuck her even if I was offered a million dollars!