6
JohnPaluska 6 points ago +8 / -2

Free speech =/= legal speech.

But what the world needs is MATURE speech.

Anyone can call for killing people, but that solves nothing.

What solves things is working through issues and PEACEFULLY demanding our rights be adhered to.

32
JohnPaluska 32 points ago +32 / -0

You all keep saying "no actions"

I'm so tired of being a broken record. . .

38 senators joined Ted Cruz in renouncing the electoral college votes and demand an investigation.

Sen Gohmert sued Mike Pence to have him perform his legal duty of challenging the Electoral votes.

Then there's the Pulitzer stuff where they are haing him forenscally review all votes in Benson County (Georgia, I think).

There's the Kraken before the Supreme Court.

President Trump also asked the Supreme Court to hear his case in Pennsylvania.

There's PLENTY BEING DONE. You just don't hear about it because the mainstream media doesn't report on it.

1
JohnPaluska 1 point ago +1 / -0

AT&T has been deeply involved in elections security and elections audits across the country.

They designed and hosted entire elections systems.

How can you say this is "suck a joke" and "garbage" when you don't even know anything about what AT&T has been doing?

by Kgraz
1
JohnPaluska 1 point ago +1 / -0

NTD News. The Epoch Times is a real anti-socialist outlet and they run NTD.

21
JohnPaluska 21 points ago +21 / -0

I like how this guy conveniently ignored:

  1. Lockdown mandates
  2. his big federal government contracts he has to keep
  3. government regulations and taxes that make the cost of production go up.
  4. State and Federal governments issuing regulations on the amount of ammunition and guns that can be bought
  5. THE NATIONAL STOCKPILE GETS FILLED BEFORE WE GET ANY BULLETS
-2
JohnPaluska -2 points ago +1 / -3

Not really. The ACLU is for natural rights. They just like socialism and cultural marxism.

They think that government should enforce and dictate culture. But they have always been anti-deep-state, anti-rights-abuses, and anti-racism.

They just don't realize that if you turn the government into the cultural regulator, then you're essentially beefing up the deep state and setting up civil rights abuses.

So yeah, they'll sue that the FBI is hacking private devices, but then they'll turn around and sue someone who wants to not make a cake for gay people because it violates their religion and tell the state to force the gay person to make the cake against their will.

I didn't say it wasn't contradictory or flawed thinking. I'm just explaining why they did this.

1
JohnPaluska 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stop watching CNN.

If you read the petition it states:

"In the 2018 General Election, when election officials were permitted to review, and candidates and parties were permitted to challenge absentee ballots, an average of 4.5% of the ballots were disallowed across Pennsylvania, with an even higher percentage, generally between 4.3 and 8.0 percent, in larger Democrat controlled counties (such as Montgomery and Philadelphia).14 In contrast, in the 2020 general election with over 2.6 million persons voting by mail – almost all for the first time – when neither election officials or candidates were permitted to review or contest the signatures, address, and date during the canvassing of mail ballots for the first time in Pennsylvania’s history, less than 0.28% percent were disqualified according to public sources, 1/16th the rate from the 2018 election.15 That disparity alone involves more ballots than the current margin of votes between the two candidates."

Now, idk about you, but purposely counting ballots that should not be counted looks like voter fraud in motion to me.

Accepting ballots that violate state law is fraudulent practices as well.

The case is about voter fraud.

1
JohnPaluska 1 point ago +1 / -0

My rights are the 2nd fucking amendment. Any state law is unconsttutional and a removal of my rights.

It's not "know your rights." We know them. It's "know which right the government will lock you up for asserting."

5
JohnPaluska 5 points ago +5 / -0

Actually, in this case they weren't. These were all deaths that were 100% double-checked to NOT BE from Coronavirus.

2
JohnPaluska 2 points ago +2 / -0

Believe it or not, SCOTUS does have the power to pause election certification and demand recounts and audits. So it actually does matter a lot.

1
JohnPaluska 1 point ago +2 / -1

If nobody's got time to chit-chat, then why are there comments sections on posts?

Further, why do people chit-chat on comments sections in posts?

1
JohnPaluska 1 point ago +2 / -1

I'm not trying to get upvotes. I'm conducting research.

We need to come together under the same issues and begin to start attacking liberal lies.

But in order to do that we first need to determine what those issues are.

-14
deleted -14 points ago +1 / -15
1
JohnPaluska 1 point ago +3 / -2

Additionally, the aconstitution calls for fsir and honest elections. It doesn't say anything about fraudulent votes.

7
JohnPaluska 7 points ago +9 / -2

The election affects everyone. If Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin had millions of fake votes between them, it completely cancels out real voters in other states.

Texans, total, only made up 11 million votes and 38 electoral votes. Only 5 million were for Trump, who won by a slim majority.

Those other 3 states made up 46 electoral votes, pretty much telling Texas their votes don't matter.

-1
JohnPaluska -1 points ago +1 / -2

Link to the lawsuit?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›