2
JokerJack 2 points ago +2 / -0

Luckily she doesn't know how to kick. Not just based off her completely missing the target. She doesn't throw her hips into the kick or pivot on her lead foot. Let alone not leaning back to make sure the kick goes high enough.

Classic female "hold my beer" gif tho.

1
JokerJack 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait... the Secretary of State is Executive Branch.. isn't this just Legislative overreach...?

SoS reports to the President, not to Congress?

What am i missing here?

11
JokerJack 11 points ago +11 / -0

Seriously. Such a minefield out there.

by GtpFt2
1
JokerJack 1 point ago +1 / -0

What's with the red fish...?

Is it a salmon?

Or wait, I think it looks like a herring!

9
JokerJack 9 points ago +9 / -0

What a piece of shit. WHY are people listening to him. He's a fucking computer programmer.

8
JokerJack 8 points ago +8 / -0

I've probably watched a total of 6+ hours of your material. Very enlightening stuff.

You're an American hero man. Get some well-deserved rest.

1
JokerJack 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was about 2-3 minutes behind the live feed - do we know how they voted?

115
JokerJack 115 points ago +115 / -0

You guys have seen Edward Solomon's work right? He's cracked the GA algorithm and is now working on the PA one.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pVAKm8JqvU

3
JokerJack 3 points ago +3 / -0

That was one of my first thoughts when I first saw a picture of her. She's like a 2 or 3 for an Asian.

1
JokerJack 1 point ago +1 / -0

The 1st Amendment does protect "Freedom of the Press", which I'm sure some legal scholars can define much better than I can, but what I think OP is talking about is specifically having a credentialed organization specifically for journalists that gives them certification that can be revoked if they're repeat offenders of spreading mis/disinformation.

If their "Journalist License" is revoked, they will still be able to "publish" articles on the press, but they won't have the "Journalist" certification.

I think part of OP's point is that having these standards set up front will be much more of a proactive way of preventing against the spread of fake news, rather than spending time relying on litigation to solve the issue.

I mostly agree with you on section 230. I'd rather see it go as well.

2
JokerJack 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think there's merit to looking into this further. Upon a casual glance at it, I'd say there are probably three different "types" of news.

  1. Classic news - dry facts and reporting of current events
  2. Editorial news - opinion/interpretation of current events
  3. Infotainment news - shows that talk about current events but the main purpose is to entertain

OP's idea of having a bar-like entity for journalists is quite intriguing. I like the concept. It'd be interesting to work out how to potentially put this type of structure in place.

1
JokerJack 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does anyone have a link to the full analysis done here that they can forward to me please? Thanks!

view more: ‹ Prev