4
JustSayIt 4 points ago +4 / -0

Space is slightly less credible after seeing her charade. She can't even keep a straight face while talking about it. What if Kamala and the child actors aren't the only things that are fake. 😂

1
JustSayIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tom is fully independent, writes all his own songs, makes his own beats and videos. He's dedicated his life and career to exposing the music industry, media, establishment, big pharma, big oil, leftists, elites like the Rockefellers and Rothchilds, and everything else that's wrong in the world but being kept from the people. Everything he says is straight facts, and he exposes shit in almost every song.

5
JustSayIt 5 points ago +5 / -0

I saw your Tom MacDonald post randomly has 80 downvotes. This is very interesting indeed.

Even more interesting is u/WhiteLeftistsRGeeks commented on this post of yours, while he's a shill going around to every Tom MacDonald post and gaslighting people with ignorant hate.

5
JustSayIt 5 points ago +5 / -0

I've been trying to figure this guy out. He comments on every Tom MacDonald post and says ignorant bullshit like that. Don't think he's ever listened to any of his music, and it sounds like he knows nothing about the guy at all.

It's fascinating how driven his hatred for him is, but at the same time, it's suspicious that everything he says attempts to gaslight people into believing the exact opposite of reality.

1
JustSayIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

He doesn't give a shit about either party. He knows they're both just puppets for the establishment.

3
JustSayIt 3 points ago +3 / -0

He may have been born in Canada, but he's more patriotic than most Americans. He's also lived in America for most of his adult life.

1
JustSayIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

I provided an hour-long video, because it condenses a magnitude of complex scientific research into a high level overview which most people should be capable of following and understanding without a scientific background.

Most people won't be willing to take the time to learn and understand the science regardless of what I give them, so I might as well provide the most approachable format. Anyone seriously considering that they are being lied to about science is going to end up reading many papers and watching countless videos before they know and understand enough to be convinced.

There's no shortage of papers on all of these topics, but presentations and interviews with some of the leading experts can also provide valuable insight into things which you may not consider when reading a paper.

Video is actually essential to see cells under an electron microscope in real-time. Pleomorphism, as shown in this video, has been observed by many molecular biologists. This alone disproves Germ Theory, which Virology is based on.

I gave a literal scientist on TD.Win a paper on vaccines and antibodies earlier today, and the fool refused to even read it and consider it's merits, because he was educated to blindly trust dogma from authorities and never question anything. I've come to the conclusion that this place is no better than Twitter or Reddit when it comes to conformity. Most other .Win's aren't so bad.

Let's see how you respond to a paper.

This paper covers one fundamental part of that video.

1
JustSayIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's a fair statement to make, and there are also many serious issues with the peer process, especially when it comes to advancing science, but we won't get into that.

Today's leading experts on true human biology science have all actually done their own research, experiments and published studies spanning over decades. Some of the earliest research into this line of thought dates back almost 200 years. Today's widely accepted Germ Theory was still highly disputed by far more credible scientists at it's inception, but it was championed and funded by John Rockefeller, and the alternative buried because it wouldn't have been as profitable for Big Pharma.

Those of us who understand enough about Virology science to know that it's based on completely unproven theory, acknowledge their work because the results of the many independent studies align with the cutting edge theory of the molecular biology, which is also supported by the vast amount of anecdotal evidence from results of patients who have been treated based on similar and overlapping theories over many decades.

2
JustSayIt 2 points ago +2 / -0

In this case, the alternatives of the molecular biology is actually pretty well understood, it's just ignored entirely by Virologists because it contradicts the dogma and would end the entire industry.

Virology is based on Germ Theory, which has never been supported by any valid scientific evidence. It was invented by Louis Pasteur, who was funded by John Rockefeller, and was highly disputed by much more credible scientists at the time. Louis Pasteur even supposedly admitted that it was a lie on his death bed.

Experiments which disprove Germ Theory have been conducted by numerous independent virologists and biologists. Pleomorphism, as shown in this video, has been observed by many scientists.

What Virologists call "isolation" does not involve any actual isolation. Control experiments have also been conducted by numerous scientists, including the inventor of the method of "isolation" himself, and they show that the same "isolated" cells that virologists identify as viruses are found even without the sample ever being contaminated with a "virus".

2
JustSayIt 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're misunderstanding what I mean. "Trust the science" is the establishment/leftist catch phrase which means blindly trust whatever the authorities tell you as gospel and never question anything.

Science is the only thing I trust, but only actual science which has been proven using the scientific method with reproducible tests that include controls, and I have a healthy level of skepticism.

I do not trust "science" which has been decided by consensus and is entirely unproven. That includes most published peer reviewed papers that make consensus-based conclusions. I also do not trust "science" just because some authority told me to trust it.

Anyone who does serious research into the history of Germ Theory and the "scientific" methods used by Virologists inevitably has to conclude that it's all based on nothing more than unproven theory and no virus has ever been isolated in the history of Virology.

I don't expect anyone here to actually be able to acknowledge any of this, since you haven't done the research and don't understand the science involved.

1
JustSayIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is a fair position to have, given what you currently know about Virology and vaccines. I give you credit for actually reading the paper and considering the merits of the points made. Your healthy level of skepticism has immediately earned my respect.

You need to try to consider the possibility that the existing model does in fact not have the huge supporting body of valid research and is in fact not as robust and proven as you have been led to believe.

I know it's hard to imagine such a large portion of modern science is based on nothing more than unproven theory, but as you learn more about this whole situation, it will become apparent that this is actually the undeniable reality of the situation.

If you're interested in learning the truth about this whole mess, you need to start with learning about Virology science and the methods used by Virologists. I suspect that you will be very surprised and shocked by what you find. Like myself and every other scientist who has gone through this journey, you will need to do a considerable amount of research before the little known alternative becomes more convincing than what we have been taught about "the science".

This interview provides a high level overview of the situation, which is a good starting point.

2
JustSayIt 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is no question but that perfect sanitation has almost obliterated smallpox, and sooner or later will dispose of it entirely. Of course, when the time comes, in all probability the credit will be give to vaccination.” — Dr. John Henry Tilden, M.D., author of Toxemia Explained

1
JustSayIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're clearly letting emotions cloud your judgement, to the point that you can't even see that you're not making a logical argument.

I gave you plenty of information about polio when I responded to your other comment, but instead of learning from it and continuing to do your own research so that you can know the truth, you're spending your time trying to discredit my argument with logical fallacies.

I won't bother wasting any more of my time on you.

2
JustSayIt 2 points ago +2 / -0

The TLDR is that it's impossible to do a TLDR on this complex topic.

1
JustSayIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Instead of believing what I say, do your own research if you're interested in knowing the truth.

Anything I say and any references I provide, will not convince you of anything. The only way you'll be able to learn the truth is by doing serious research and gaining an understanding of the science, and you need to actually want to do that on your own.

1
JustSayIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unfortunately, your education is a disadvantage when it comes to things like this, because you have been taught a lot of unquestionable dogma, which prevents you from ever having enough skepticism to want to validate any theory yourself.

While I don't want to waste more time arguing with you about anything, I am curious enough to ask you one final question:

Do you believe that human bacteria cells exhibit pleomorphism?

1
JustSayIt 1 point ago +2 / -1

Almost no one on TD.Win is ready to know the truth about the virus and vaccines. Anytime I bring up anything related to the reality of the situation in this .Win, I feel like I'm on Twitter or Reddit.

1
JustSayIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

This kind of logic right here is the reason why it's so easy for everyone to be fooled. Stop making stupid assumptions about things and do some actual research.

I've responded to your other comment, where you asked about Polio, and provided a lot of information.

0
JustSayIt 0 points ago +2 / -2

If you do serious research into any virus, you'll be able to learn the real cause of the disease, which explains everything that has ever been observed about it. You'll also find out about the terrifying reality about the real damage done by each vaccine, which has been kept from the general population.

Even without learning the full story about each vaccine, you can easily see that most of them never actually reduced the number of cases, just by looking at charts that show the cases were already right down before the vaccine was introduced. Polio is no exception.

In many cases, you'll find that cases and illness actually went up after a vaccine was introduced, and even decades later, there are regular outbreaks which they admit are "vaccine derived". There are regular vaccine-derived polio outbreaks around the world still today, which is no secret, and MSM even reports many of the outbreaks.

The polio vaccine killed a large number of people, and destroyed the lives of many more. We'll never know the true scale of the damage done just by that one vaccine alone. There are also many other serious concerns surrounding it, like Man sheds deadly polio virus in feces for 28 years, and CDC admits 98 million Americans were given polio shots which could have been contaminated with cancer virus.

I could go on and on about just polio alone, but you should really listen to this talk where Dr. Eva Snead speaks about the little known history of Vaccinations, AIDS, & Cancer. You'll be shocked to learn about the connection between early polio vaccines and AIDS.

view more: Next ›