2
Jweik1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

I guess from a legal standpoint, the company she worked with can bring her to court. It wouldn't make for a strong case I don't think. Sueing a person for saying something about a company that is in another country? It would be an interesting case!

6
Jweik1984 6 points ago +7 / -1

He is also asking for a deadline of Decemeber 9th. The last day to certify is December 8th. If a decision is made on the 9th, PA becomes moot.

2
Jweik1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Something makes a bell ring for me. They say they are outside of the US, so they can't get in trouble by our government. If that is the case, and they are outside of the US, why do they care about their very strict NDA?

1
Jweik1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because December 8th is the deadline to certify. "Safe harbor" Meaning after the 8th, PA doesn't matter.

2
Jweik1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

He will die in jail for sure.

2
Jweik1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even if they did try to cover their tracks, there are bound to be mistakes with the number of fraudulent ballots out.

4
Jweik1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

And the money is coming from where? People today shouldn't have to pay for past generations mistakes.

If that is the case, 18 year old Japanese people owe us ALOT of money. You see how dumb that sounds?

2
Jweik1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Great contribution. I am Mr. English teacher. We are talking about something that is far more important.

Also, you forgot a period.

7
Jweik1984 7 points ago +7 / -0

No. But the "fact checkers" said she talked to the media today and that she said she told noone to leave.

Unless I am confusing two different people. I probably am.

4
Jweik1984 4 points ago +5 / -1

Anything I have seen posted about Matt Braynard or Bobby Piton was removed today in several minutes. It will be removed unfortunately.

2
Jweik1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Half of you are women, and the other half aren't. Oh really?

4
Jweik1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

I've emailed her several times now. Very nice messages of course.

2
Jweik1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://defendingtherepublic.org

Top right menu > court filings > kraken court filings > GA district court > 11.29 transcript.

2
Jweik1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lemme see if I can dig up the sauce.

2
Jweik1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is from transcripts from Sidney Powells website. Unfortunately I didn't save the website and screenshoted that several days ago.

2
Jweik1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

"The voters that voted has their" is a really confusing sentence.

4
Jweik1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

I am reading 1474 votes were changed. Am I misreading it?

by Mercat
3
Jweik1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah. I wonder if they are able to tell "age" differences in ink? That may be a stupid question. You would think ink would start to deteriorate and it could be estimated closely when the ink was used.

1
Jweik1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Apparently in GA, 2 representatives do not have to be there when messing with ballots? That needs to be rewritten ASAP.

3
Jweik1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'll have you know, that on ps3, for battlefield 4, I am number 1 in the world for kills with this and 2 other jets. That is all.

27
Jweik1984 27 points ago +27 / -0

She told reporters today that she sent noone home! So she basically screwed herself. Good find.

2
Jweik1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you are referring the the QTIP look alike, she was way worse. She butt in, over talked, and continuously mouthed gibberish while people were talking. How does she even get elected. Don't answer that, I have an idea how. I'm not defending this bitch, she asked questions like it was her 2nd day of a hard ovulation.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›