except DJT isn't the President of the United States being tried...
Dude - trump caved long ago. he was never in it for us, only himself
its almost like there was a pandemic...
if there was the evidence, wouldn't he have made it clear though? like honestly
lol maybe they should have worn masks then they wouldn't be so easily identifiable
is covid really a big deal though?
except they're upholding the constitution and the law of the land. texas didn't have standing. imagine if this went through and then vermont could sue texas for the way texas regulates its oil industry. that shit would be wack.
except they didn't have standing. just because jay sekulow thinks its air-tight doesn't mean it is
States can't determine the number of electors. They're determined by the constitution.
no- what they're saying is texas has no legal standing to sue another state for the manner in which they conducted their election. constitution gives the power to the legislature which can do whatever it wants
the logic is: if your neighbor shoots your other neighbors dog, you cant sue because your dog died.
you can't appeal to anyone after SCOTUS
how does the law of the land not exist?
or maybe we got too excited about the possibilities?
maybe there is a reason to not hear it, because they still need to hear the kraken lawsuit
or maybe the hand-picked judges by trump are right and texas is wrong?
but more people joining suit wont change the legal arguments will it?
Welp - my expectation is you're going to be calling SCOTUS treasonous soon. I don't think they will do a thing to change it.
Sec of State would need to do that. Could be compelled to via law passed by veto-proof super majority of legislatures though.
Just because a dem Sec of State won after 25 years of rep winning doesn't mean fraud. You're diluting the term when you use such baseless "evidence" to support your position.
lol - where is executive power delegated to the legislature in the constitution?
more importantly - how can you tell which ballots were of the 305k? and is the appropriate remedy for the people that voted in good faith to eliminate their vote?
No they're not.
because someone sued. no one is suing to continue the wall.