People don't realize liberals are actually worse than nazis. If you look at the pathology of their belief, it is more likely a nazi could come to terms with a peace among enemies than a liberal, since liberals believe their enemy is destroying the planet and their thoughts are literally oppressing them. Perhaps, this is arguable, but it's not what makes them worse. It is that they don't actually even believe their own narrative. They've actually purposely chosen this cornering deceitful ideology because it gives them what they think is a moral license to work to remove their enemies ultimately. You see, the nazis did believe they were a superior race. So, there is a heart there, black or distorted it may be, it is still not a self-reinforcing functional lie. The trick to understand this is to not believe a liar. Look at what they say and do. Liberal leftism is all a con. They ruin the environment, they stifle economic growth, they kill freedom and liberty. They believe in nothing, in fact, because the core motivation for them is to make a nullification war with Christianity. They are sociopaths, and their pathology is a monomania of hatred for Christians and Christianity. It's their scapegoat and goal. They see Christians and Christianity has dominated the world, see the world as flawed, and that's it. It's that simple. When Christianity is gone then they will be free in some unknown way that they are sure will be the solution. They are all brainwashed to instinctively believe this. Yes, your instincts can be indoctrinated. All the work of entertainment, school, music, popular culture, what does it teach us? That Christians are backwards and ruining all the fun. So, the path forward is clear, isn't it? Make an enemy of any Christian dogma or influence, which means becoming some godless wad of stupid, regardless of intellect. The reality is it testifies against them to be this way. I am making this judgement. I say this is what is in the heart of hearts of this ideology - and to those who hold onto it. And I believe they are far worse than nazis. These are weak people who hate, which means they will find other methods of mass murder or suppression than force. Poison, germs, economic destruction, loss of secure environments, drugs - they are cowards and fight like it.
Additionally, to illustrate how the "science" of evolution is not science because it has no predictive quality, one could ask: what are humans, or elephants, or horses, or dogs turning into?
You might try to say something about how the seasonal flu vaccine is derived from predictions about the changes in the next seasons strain, but what is the virus turning into? It does not EVER stop being a virus, so long as it is not extinct. There is no evidence that the change we observe is beyond variation contained within a given creature. That variation may very well be, for all intents and purposes, infinite, BUT it does not change form. Evolutionists see the design rationality in God's creation, a matrix of biological agents, and fills in the HUGE blanks with it's own ostensibly rational godless narrative.
I know it wouldn't matter if it were true, but this DOES fuel the left. Evolution is not true, so all you're doing is aiding your enemy.
Sure, so do I. Wolves can be bred into chihuahuas, but not a door mouse, or a cat.
The Bible says there is a different flesh for each animal, and that God created all the animals according to their kinds. This is what we observe in the natural world. The secular worldview of humans and cosmic origins is a story piggy-backing off the rationality of God's design.
Mutations aren't the redeeming apparatus you want it to be. Yes, I understand, genes are passed onto progeny, but there is, again, zero evidence that evolution, via this process, accounts for phenotypic change. (Maybe I shouldn't say "phenotypic," but rather, the "differences in phenotype" would be better) If living things were made first into a set of some primal sub groups, it would appear the same way (and that's what the Bible says - God made "kinds" of animals first). There's a difference between variation and planning. That is the bridge our scientific observations do not cross. Anything that says this bridge is crossed is a story. I realize how this seems to be a rational leap for people, but it is a story. God did this on purpose. His story gives the true account. So, no, I don't accept that the world before us can arise through incremental, upward, trial and error reproduction. At the current rate of mutations (in our fallen, sin cursed world), nothing would survive long enough for evolution to occur. It is a real problem - one of mutational load. There are estimates that have mutational load becoming an insurmountable burden on humanity in 300 years or so. This is considered a "paradox" in evolution, but we don't hear too much about it. Wonder why. All this nwo stuff is fueled by the belief in evolution. It's how the liberals have justified their lunacy, since in an evolutionary world, everything is just a convention.
Shapiro is the product of good parenting, and why good-parenting matters, but he's a hack with no instincts or guts. He supposedly realizes the threat before us, but never failed to nitpick President Trump throughout his term. In my opinion, he's a total asshole for this.
The way I see it, the reason the future looks bleak is because people do not, today, understand that the concept of God is essential in establishing human rights. There's no other way that doesn't lead to tyranny. I've been trying to explain to conservative atheists that it doesn't matter if you believe in God or not. It's simply a reference where we can all be on equal-footing. But such is the nature of this world, and it will go in a bad direction because everyone is just too smart now by half. What you think is a corollary notion in "self-evident" is relative to "the greater good." It's losing. Rights must be predicated on God, as a function of the human condition. And I'll leave it at that.
You can't think of it as there being some silver-bullet to fix everything. Liberty and freedom will always be at war with tyranny, so long as tyranny exists in human nature. This doesn't make it a flawed principle. It's harder to do good, just as it's harder to build up, while it's easier to do evil, as it's also easier to tear down.
Once I get going. . . I have to make the full circle.