Yeah, okay, but if you look at a person's comment history sometimes it can seem a little off. I made this post because of the poster called Anger who was asking if anyone had bought guns this year. Out of curiosity, I looked at his history and it just seemed short and boilerplate, plus his account is 53 days old. A few comments stuck out to me, because he seemed to just make short inane conservative boilerplate comments, but some would pop up about that seemed to go from his usual 1's to being a 10, you know. I didn't name him in the post, but I figured I'd express my suspicion about it somehow. It's probably nothing and I'm not trying to spread paranoia, but I do think there are feds in here trying to build their profiles up.
In post edit: So, while writing this I decided to go and look at his comments again. It's gone. I remember his name because it was very simple - Anger. Guy's gone now.
Cops are just dodos following orders so they can make their bills. Aside from this, which is clearly true, leadership positions are always increasingly liberal as you go up, because the higher you go up, supposedly, the more accountability and visibility, right? So, what do we have in "liberalism" generally? A theme in the culture that is pushing the definition of liberal itself as far to the left and as absurd as possible as a new normal. And not simply the culture, but legally - but these go hand in hand. Leadership simply abides and orders their people accordingly to such new normals. blm protest's, and even though their cause is bullshit, they are treated with kid gloves because of the supposed sensitive nature of their protest. No thinking is involved. America has always been like this, but Liberals (big L) have found out how to game the dynamics - becoming increasingly freaks and unhuman and the public will have to adapt to it as it unravels.
Where are the lawsuits against a supposed "free press" making political targets and offering their dogshit as news to the public? They're allowed to just do whatever they want? We can have 10,000 gun control laws but nothing to protect and promote honesty in the media? This country is so stupid. democrats would have gotten it done.
The best reasoning I have for why this is taking so long is because of the implications for further investigations of treason. Whether or not we actually get indictments for treason, my point is they needed to make sure they were doing everything soundly. And this would be backed up and reverified by even more overview. This alone makes it a very time consuming process.
-Laws are policies that all members of a population under a jurisdiction are meant to obey.
-Gun confiscation laws are laws that disarm the public.
-Both law abiding citizens and criminals comprise the total public.
-Those who obey the gun confiscation laws will be disarmed.
-Criminals are ones who do not obey laws.
-Criminals will not be disarmed.
....
Deductive
Sure thing, jerk. But retarded? Is that a scientific term? I really don't see the arrogance in that post. I'm just trying to make it more plain to see the fundamental unworkable nature of evolution in reality. The beauty of this is it's not something you can look up on wiki, and yes, it's simple to understand. If you engage with it, it forces you to think on your own. The emergence of a "widget" is a fair analogy of what would be the case if evolution were true. It's just a thought experiment to allow cutting through endless definitions masquerading as rescue devices. It attacks the very premise of the idea of evolution being able to jive feasibly with observed reality. I really did wish you would have tried to dismantle this challenge at face value.
Amen.