Yeah, I doubt it. See, McDonalds feeds a lot of people all over the world. They don't put things on the menu that only 5 percent of the population likes, hence, why there is no catfish and gator. Further, there are no fast food restaurants serving up catfish and gator for a reason. Most people don't like these proteins, period. You can find Uncle Joe's Catfish Shack in Norlens down on the bayou that serves exclusively catfish and gator, but that's all you will find. These proteins are typically covered with all kinds of bread, as well, to disguise the horrible taste. Nobody eats a catfish fillet with salt, pepper, and butter.
I keep thinking there must be a critical mass where even liberals become sick of the crime and ridiculous governments, and drop the charade. Like, every time you hear of some incident there must be at least 5, or potentially even, hundreds of people affected who have a sudden change of perspective. I don't know now, seems like it's really probably the frogs being boiled thing.
When I say cgi, I mean any digital rendering. As far as real practical visual effects, that would be the only way to fool the human eye and brain. But I don't think anyone is saying this is a practical effect. The only way digital can really fool anyone today is if the image is purposely made blurry or something happens so fast you aren't sure, or some kind of fooling around with it so you can't make a confirmation, but this video doesn't seem like that at all. Like I say, nothing about it seems fake, except that because I can't explain it and that it seems so significant I could yield to these external gumption-based factors being explanatory. But I don't.
I mean, just watch it again. The person is set on the exhaust cloud for a while. Then they pan back around :50 mark - computers don't make smoke that good, or the clouds. Looks, definitely, real.
It's funny, though, I stopped to see if I could find any more angles, since the exhaust trail is in the air for a while, and I find the DOD and Billings authorities are saying it was a hoax.
All I can say is I don't believe that, I guess. Unless it's taken from another time and is a meteor or something, I cannot accept this was made by anyone. If there is even one thing out there that is confirmed fabricated that has the same quality I would like to see it.
Nah, I've seen unreal engine 5. That's pretty much the pinnacle of cgi capabilities right now. It's extremely impressive, but it still doesn't look like real life with its grit and atmosphere and other dynamic things, like clouds and smoke, that a computer will never be able to duplicate perfectly in a combined application. And even if someone could duplicate that video to where I couldn't say yes or no to it's authenticity, by itself, as it is now, it makes no sense that it would be fake, because you can't even tell what's happening. Would have been a complete waste of time for a faker. Could be just a meteor or something, and then where's the fear and clicks? If someone had that kind of capability, they'd make sure you see what you're supposed to see.
You don't. And so what? Do you ever leave your house without your phone now? You can get stuck in the wilderness through some accident without your phone, and then what is your phone worth? In it's physical form away from you, it's worth nothing. In the abstract, it's worth saving your life. Bitcoin utilizes those abstract rules of currency. Demand and Security is all that's required.
Nobody is saying Bitcoin is The Currency, or that there's nothing else besides Bitcoin, but it is a real currency for sure.
If someone figured out a way to turn lead into gold with household chemicals, the demand would disappear overnight. Granted, not a real scenario, but just the same, it means value is relatively determinant. So long as there is electricity there's no reason to think Bitcoin will fail. And if the power went out to the extent that there are emp attacks or society is imploding, there'd be a lot bigger problems than Bitcoin. As well, even gold loses it's value in that scenario.
Ask it if it can recognize a duality in it's moralizing.