5
Kabubum 5 points ago +6 / -1

He is not going to win the election, he has already won it on election night!

Anybody saying Trump still needs to win is just following the MSM propaganda about Trump trying to change the result of the election. The results are already in and they are clear: Trump won in a landslide. Just because some media reported "results", which are riddled with fraud, and they will have to adjust their "results" with more and more fraud exposed, does not mean that the actual true result of the election has changed or is going to change.

0
Kabubum 0 points ago +1 / -1

There are only 4 intervalls where actual updates happen. All timestamps inbetween show absolutely no change. Therefore these timestamps can actually be deleted. These so called "transfers" are just the updates, it is logical that then the ratios switch and some other polling place reports the same ratios as another one did before.

As an example take the ratio 1:5:

At 07:08:18 the first update comes in and polling place 05-30 has this ratio. At the first update, at 9:39:44, 05-30 changes to a 43:219. This is as expected that with new votes there is a new ratio. With the same update, four new polling places have the 1:5 ratio: 01-05, 05-13, 05-24 and 19-02. Again, this is as expected, as with every update the ratios should change for every polling station.

Next update is at 15:11:18, and the four polling places which had the 1:5 ratios, all have new ratios. On the other hand, location 25-16 and 36-29 newly have the 1:5 ratio.

Next update is 20:02:30, but nothing changes for this ratio. However, for this update, only very few locations reported actual updates. Therefore no new locations with a 1:5 ratio is entirely possible.

the last update on the 4th is at 20:47:22. Here again the two places which had previously the 1:5 ratios switch to a new ratio, but 48-18 newly has this ratio.

This is all entirely plausible, as with every update and new votes the ratios change for the polling places. This means, that at every update different polling places will have a certain ratio.

On the other hand, if with new votes the ratios would stay constant, that would be VERY suspicious.

2
Kabubum 2 points ago +2 / -0

Unfortunately I do not have that data. Closest thing I have is this. This however just shows al the changes.

0
Kabubum 0 points ago +1 / -1

This might be misleading.

If you look at the data for Philadelphia and the 4th alone, then there are only 4 times when the system is actually updated with new data. Inbetween the data stays the same for every polling location. Therefore all these rows inbetween can actually be deleted.

But if you have only 4 updates, then it is logical that the ratios "transfer" during these updates.

Pls go and verify this yourself. Heres the amount of polling places reporting actual updates per each timestamp:

9:39:44 -> 1685

15:11:18 -> 1695

20:02:30 -> 189

20:47:22 ->1677

Again, for all other timestamps there was no actual change for no polling location.

3
Kabubum 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you look at the data for Philadelphia and the 4th alone, then there are only 4 times when the system is actually updated with new data. Inbetween the data stays the same for every polling location. Therefore all these rows inbetween can actually be deleted.

But if you have only 4 updates, then it is logical that the ratios "transfer" during these updates.

Pls go and verify this yourself. Heres the amount of polling places reporting actual updates per each timestamp:

9:39:44 -> 1685

15:13:33 -> 1695

20:10:16 -> 189

20:47:22 ->1677

Again, for all other timestamps there was no actual change for no polling location.

2
Kabubum 2 points ago +2 / -0

There seems to be only 4 times when actual changes were processed on the 4th in Philadelphia.

I counted the amount of polling locations that reported a change for each time using the Philadelphia dataset.

9:39:44 = 1685 15:13:33 = 1695 20:10:17 = 189 20:47:22 = 1677

I don't know how exactly this ties into your findings, but just seeing that the 20:10:17 update affects far fewer locations might be something to be looked at.

4
Kabubum 4 points ago +4 / -0

On what is this based? percentage of total votes? If I check Hillarys votes in Los Angeles County in 2016 it is 1,893,770. Biden is reported to have 2,980,478 now. So in absolute votes there is a big increase for Biden. However, Hillary took 71.4% of total votes and Biden only 71.15, so in terms of voting percentage Biden actually is slightly underperforming Hillary.

However in Dallas county, Biden got 65.14% of the votes vs Hillarys 61.1%, so there he performed better.

21
Kabubum 21 points ago +21 / -0

Reminder that in the 2016 election the votes counted by hand and by the machines didn't match in many detroit precincts:

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2016/12/12/records-many-votes-detroits-precincts/95363314/

11
Kabubum 11 points ago +12 / -1

https://archive.is/MrKzl

look how the uncounted ballots just keep going up in Georgia

1
Kabubum 1 point ago +1 / -0

If 100k are requested and 80% of those are returend, then there should be 80k votes by mail. Or am I missing something? The 91k number the guy in the video cites is suspicious though, since it is higher than the other sources and the guy in the video specifically says no late ballots have been received.

1
Kabubum 1 point ago +1 / -0

For ballots returned I can find sources which more or less all have the same numbers. But do you also have a source for ballots counted? That's what I cannot find