In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not shrink from this responsibility—I welcome it. I do not believe that any of us would exchange places with any other people or any other generation. The energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavor will light our country and all who serve it—and the glow from that fire can truly light the world. -JFK
The whirlwinds of revolt will continue to shake the foundations of our nation until the bright day of justice emerges.
But there is something that I must say to my people, who stand on the warm threshold which leads into the palace of justice:** In the process of gaining our rightful place, we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds. Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred. We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline. We must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence. Again and again, we must rise to the majestic heights of meeting physical force with soul force.**
The marvelous new militancy which has engulfed the Negro community must not lead us to a distrust of all white people, for many of our white brothers, as evidenced by their presence here today, have come to realize that their destiny is tied up with our destiny. And they have come to realize that their freedom is inextricably bound to our freedom.>
SCOTUS will rule that the 4 disputes state elections will be resolved in the state legislators. although PA may not vote Trump, MI 16 WI 10 GA 16 will probably vote Trump.
Trump is at 232 without these states. 232 + 16+10+16=
274 !!!!!!
When this plays out, remember this post 😉
"what Texas seeks is for the Supreme Court to mandate that the defendant states comply with the Constitution, and that means that electors are selected by the states’ legislatures. Texas makes this point clear, stressing: “Plaintiff State does not ask this Court to decide who won the election; they only ask that the Court enjoin the clear violations of the Electors Clause of the Constitution.”
The Act empowers the U.S. president to call into service the U.S. Armed Forces and the National Guard:
when requested by a state's legislature, or governor if the legislature cannot be convened, to address an insurrection against that state (§ 251), to address an insurrection, in any state, which makes it impracticable to enforce the law (§ 252), or to address an insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination or conspiracy, in any state, which results in the deprivation of Constitutionally-secured rights, and where the state is unable, fails, or refuses to protect said rights (§ 253). The 1807 Act replaced the earlier Calling Forth Act of 1792, which had allowed for federalization of state militias, with similar language that allowed either for federalization of state militias or use of the regular armed forces in the case of rebellion against a state government.[3]:60
In 1871, the Third Enforcement Act revised this section (§ 253) to protect Black Americans from attacks by the Ku Klux Klan. The language added at that time allows the federal government to use the act to enforce the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Insurrection Act of 1807 The Act empowers the U.S. president to call into service the U.S. Armed Forces and the National Guard: to address an insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination or conspiracy, in any state, which results in the deprivation of Constitutionally-secured rights, and where the state is unable, fails, or refuses to protect said rights (§ 253).
Their article about PA lawsuit:
"In the case before Brann, the Trump campaign asked to disenfranchise the state’s 6.8 million voters, or at least the 700,000 who voted by mail in Philadelphia, Pittsburgh and other Democratic-leaning areas."
"In fact, Pennsylvania officials had certified their vote count Monday for President-elect Joe Biden, who defeated Trump by more than 80,000 votes in the state. Nationally, Biden and running mate Kamala Harris garnered nearly 80 million votes, a record in U.S. presidential elections."
POWELL IS RIGHT. THIS IS A ROCK SOLID CASE!!! Clear Evidence that:
-
96,000 Votes weren't recorded and must be dismissed.
-
20,000 Votes from out of state must be dismissed.
-
up to 38,000 Votes were "LOST"
-
Many indicators of Fraud suggest the "official numbers" were manipulated, such as: 0.00167% of Absentee ballots rejected (Only 30 in entire state!)
-
Experts and even DEMOCRATS claim that Dominion machines are easily hackable and manipulated.
-
Governor and Sec of State Illegally and Unconstitutionally bypassed State Election Law for election process, Violated the DUE PROCESS and EQUAL PROTECTION of LAW (14th Amendment)
Powell's case explains how:
-
Sec. of State Raffensperger, and the State Election Board, made a DEAL with the Democrats called the "COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT"
-
the Settlement changed the way absentee ballots would be handled, which violates the statutes prescribed by the State Legislature.
-
This is in violation of State Law AND US Constitution Law, as the Legislature is empowered to make election law. NOT THE SECRETARY OF STATE!