Yes, it's crazy how this has snowballed and anyone looking closely at the data will realize this. Many of us tried to point this out before it got too big but... too late now.

So is the game now to just bring attention to something and hope it sticks? I do hope this plan works but have zero confidence it will.

This should be the top post of all time! (not that other one... btw, anyone else notice the TOP link doesn't show anything anymore?)

Spez: TOP link is working again. Now what about Search?

Related Tweet from Jim Hanson: https://twitter.com/JimHansonDC/status/1326625312512282627?s=20

PROBLEM Election2020 had mail in ballots accepted in impossibly large numbers 2020 <1% rejected 2018 >14% rejected https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/750000-mail-ballots-rejected-2016-2018-matters/story?id=73645323 PA accepted ballots at 30x the rate as their last election https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2020-11/cbc.pdf

Did all voters get smarter & more diligent? Or...

Love this guy and this is news we can all get behind, unlike the Top post of all time which appears to be unvetted.

(yes, of course, there is likely computer fraud but that post wasn't the smoking gun we were hoping for... I think Dr. Shiva is much closer to the target with this post: https://twitter.com/va_shiva/status/1326220987608621056?s=20).

Do you think it's possible she was vetted and didn't find her credible? Honestly, after watching, I have some serious reservations.

Oh brother. A guy speaks the truth and suddenly he's cucked? Need to check ourselves before we become them. "at this stage", "Of course, that could change". We're better than this, right?

Yup. My guess as well. Now should this post have been the Top post of all time or the one based on incorrect data?

I knew this was going to happen to you. I tried messaging moderators and the owner of the thread, and posting as you did but never addressed by anyone... sad. And now the All-Time Top post is Fake news. Ironic, huh? Need some overzealous memes for folks on this site. Lol.

I certainly hope so. Another poster has some valid counter claims so need to determine what’s true and what’s not true.

Yes, please check this comment: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/x/c/1BivibkdjK

BOTH cannot be true and I certainly don't trust a new poster without proper vetting of his biased view where u/PedeInspector even admits he didn't include both sides.

There were indeed switches that went from Biden to Trump, albeit a LOT smaller, for example, in Pennsylvania, 220,883 Trump votes were switched to Biden, and 24,721 Biden votes were switched to Trump, only reason I didn't mention the other way around, was because I wanted it to get to the top and in the eyes of the Trump team as soon as possible, and thought it might be possible that it impedes that.

Someone is really wrong here and we should all try to get to the bottom of this.

This contradicts u/PedeInspector: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/x/c/1BivibkdjK

Don't like the feel of this one folks.

Really wish this would gain attention and this post needs to be un-stickied immediately, at least until proper vetting.

According to u/PedeInspector from here this post: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O0gyAf/x/c/1ATp1A4gC7

There were indeed switches that went from Biden to Trump, albeit a LOT smaller, for example, in Pennsylvania, 220,883 Trump votes were switched to Biden, and 24,721 Biden votes were switched to Trump, only reason I didn't mention the other way around, was because I wanted it to get to the top and in the eyes of the Trump team as soon as possible, and thought it might be possible that it impedes that.

Now someone PLEASE explain this as it appears to have gone both ways: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/x/c/1BivibkdjK

New Tweet: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1326327582074220544?s=20

Or read this post first: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/x/c/1BivibkdjK

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/x/c/1BivibkdjK

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/x/c/1BivibkdjK

If you get deported we are all in serious trouble. No idea why the mods keep this stickied. At the very least this post should be vetted. This could backfire bigly and there are only a few so far who realize this.

My thoughts exactly. Unlike that pinned "HAPPENING!!..." post* that has the 2nd all time number of votes, this better be real news that's been supremely vetted.

*See this link: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/x/c/1BivigJ35j

This needs more attention and is exactly what I was afraid of when he said he didn't do the other way because he wanted attention.

And PedoJoe knew about it.

Thanks for the clarity. Exactly what I was looking for and, if you step back from it all, is actually quite fascinating.

Just watched Rudy on a Newmax feed and the journalist asked a similar question: How does this resolve? Not sure Rudy exactly answered but he did say that the states, if fraud is proven, wouldn't be able to certify the vote. But, in reality and based on your post, this really means the state will decide who gets the EC seats.

So are you saying the majority of PA, WI, MI, GA, NV, AZ are republican-controlled? I guess I will see if I can do some research on this as your scenarios really do seem likely (instead of Trump somehow winning the popular vote in these states, for example).

Can I get the TLDR from the TLDW?

And, for giggles, why don't you explain it to me like I'm an 8 year old... and then explain it for others like they are five?

Shows 95 and no winner

Link?

Is decision desk legit?