1
KarlMarxInDrag 1 point ago +1 / -0

Propaganda is just spreading information to alter people's behavior. It can be true or false information. The great meme war is basically a propaganda war.

The real bitch of it is when you find out almost everything you learned in school was propaganda. It was all basically a big web of lies mixed with truth designed to make you behave in convenient ways for the rich and powerful.

Half the information in our history books was written for the convenience of the Soviet Union and Marxist ideologues.

It's very difficult and time consuming to figure out just what the fuck is going on in this world.

4
KarlMarxInDrag 4 points ago +4 / -0

This. It's hard to call people the resistance when they've been the active aggressor for the last 150 years.

1
KarlMarxInDrag 1 point ago +1 / -0

He might after the election but any of those actions would be met with months or years of litigation, court decisions, propaganda and raving about how fascist Trump is controlling the media.

One of Trumps most powerful tools is that people don't trust the media. They lie about him so much that he actually looks like a victim of the media. If he were to take severe actions against them it would ruin those optics and push people toward the side of the MSM.

3
KarlMarxInDrag 3 points ago +3 / -0

She's brave wearing those handlebars in front of a bunch of crazed leftists.

0
KarlMarxInDrag 0 points ago +1 / -1

"Nipping it in the bud" would have meant not flooding our country with a hundred million foreigners who vote almost exclusively for socialists.

It would have meant fighting back against the Cruikshank decision, the federal reserve act, the donation of trillions of dollars to Stalins communist regime, taking in millions of German and Polish radical Marxists letting them inftrate our industry, universities, media and government, letting war after war after war take place and go nowhere, bankrupting our nation, our people and our future.

Do you really think anything we do now is preemptive?

1
KarlMarxInDrag 1 point ago +2 / -1

You pointed out how you feel, you little tyrant. There was no argument there. Why can't you let people be free to fuck up?

Do you actually think it will hurt Trump when they disband their police and it blows up in their faces? Dont interrupt your enemy when they're fucking the dog.

0
KarlMarxInDrag 0 points ago +1 / -1

This is a good example. Thanks for bringing it up. I gotta say though, the lines are pretty blurred with the Mexican police as well. Those guys are incredibly corrupt.

I'd say even our own police forces have been horrifically corrupt and constantly slaughter people in their own homes at the wrong address or for unconstitutional reasons.

My main argument is that they should be free to take responsibility for their outcomes of their own governance. They have the right to structure their own law enforcement however they see fit and if it does turn into a shit show then they should should fix it.

I don't like this tendency people have to tinker with the lives of everyone in the world just because we get news from their city. Just because I know about something doesn't give me the justification to Karen around with it until it makes me happy.

What the communists want is for us to say "oh look they're doing things different! Quick give the feds ultra powerful laws to force them to stay in line!" That's exactly the centralized authority the commies love.

Ultimately people aren't free if they aren't allowed to hurt themselves.

1
KarlMarxInDrag 1 point ago +2 / -1

You can't trust anyone with power. You must always assume they have selfish motives and don't give a fuck about you and then analyze their behavior from that perspective. It'll be more accurate.

Trump is doing things I like and things I don't like. The things I like outweigh the things I don't by a significant margin so he has my support.

If you must, give your faith to God and not some flawed human. Give only cynical and tenuous credence to any mortal.

1
KarlMarxInDrag 1 point ago +4 / -3

OK Karen, you wear that crown and suckle those poor ignorant subjects for us. We wouldn't want anyone getting uppity and rustling your jimmies from 1000 miles away.

1
KarlMarxInDrag 1 point ago +5 / -4

So in this place that you don't live and will never visit, you want to decide how these people govern themselves under the auspices of our own constitution?

How many gays do you think are currently being tolerated in the pedophile prophet areas of the city, Karen? They already have John Hopkins doctors slicing off girls' genitals, so I don't think mutilating some gays is beyond their reach.

Despite the feeble protestations of the police who are rendered impotent by the centralized authority of their leftist mayor, sharia law marches on.

Maybe I've thought about this more than you. And let's not virtue signal about how many invisible heartwarming fucks you give about fudge stuffers you've never met. They're just a rhetorical tool for you, Karen.

4
KarlMarxInDrag 4 points ago +6 / -2

They're also there to enforce red flag gun laws, rubber stamped no knock raids, 2nd amendment bans and civil asset forfeiture.

What's up with cuckservatives abandoning liberty for convenience?

3
KarlMarxInDrag 3 points ago +6 / -3

Letting people be governed how they choose is a republican ideal. If they want decentralized law enforcement what right does the federal government have to tell them they can't?

2
KarlMarxInDrag 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did not know that. What did the aliens look like?

1
KarlMarxInDrag 1 point ago +3 / -2

I cant really have a problem with this. I've been asking for decentralization for ever so let's see what they do.

Granted I know they're going to do a shit job and probably just pass out a bunch of guns to gangbangers but let's watch.

3
KarlMarxInDrag 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm pretty sure black people existed in Star Track. At least there was that chick, Aloha, who ran the unhelpful call center that always hung up on people and pretended she couldn't get through.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›