found these

https://humansarefree.com/2021/02/time-magazine-biden-election-well-funded-secret-cabal.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/24/us/politics/democrats-trump-election-plan.html

https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/

Parler seems to be on the table

yeah that would be great info to put into one clip

excellent comment. Do you have some links or sources for that

This is not trading it is a pyramid scheme. And as with any pyramid scheme, there has to be losers that give their money to the winners.

While that happens based on fundamentals in stocks, this is all out stockuckery

From article:

"There are real environmental problems in this world: the overfishing of the oceans, plastic pollution, invasive alien species, and the conservation of the curlew and the red squirrel in my part of the world. These are urgent and important. They need money, but it will be a pittance compared with the sums we are talking about. Yet they are starved even of that pittance because of the coalition of preachers and profiteers who have climbed on the climate bandwagon and demanded a limitless budget."

"We need to look at these costs alongside the cost of doing nothing—that is, the cost of damage by climate change. This is called the social cost of carbon and is an estimate of the total harm done by emissions now and brought forward from the future. That metric is not mentioned in this order or in the Committee on Climate Change’s report. The best guess in the current scientific literature is that the social cost of carbon is about $45 per tonne, which is roughly the number that the Obama Administration were using. Can my noble friend give us his department’s estimate of the social cost of carbon? What is his department’s estimate of the abatement cost per tonne of the net zero ambition?"

"Once we know those numbers, we can know whether we are getting value for money with this expenditure. Otherwise, we might be committing to a climate policy that is actually more harmful and costly to human and planetary well-being than climate change itself—which would surely be irrational. I fear that hasty and ill-supported commitment making of this kind is the sort of thing that provokes judicial review. The Government should pause, think this through and do a proper cost-benefit analysis before they commit to this policy."

Its Horowitz good luck with anything coming out of that except the results they want

Agreed but it happened to "Them"

Or should I say planned to happen.

Never let a crisis go to waste

and the logical step from there is why not create it

from article:

"Let’s all remember this little tidbit. George Soros, aka George Schwartz, was a child spy who informed on his fellow Jews and his own family for the Nazis, sending many to their death. In short, he was an accomplice to murder and war crimes. In an interview with Steve Croft of CBS’ 60 Minutes, Soros acknowledged what he did and that he never once felt remorse or guilt for his actions. Does anyone need an explanation on how and why Soros turned into the adult that he is today? The Nazis rewarded him for his criminal acts and world governments rewarded his evil through lack of prosecution. He changed his name to hide what he did. But, when it was exposed, no one held this man to the law. And, Soros has engaged in repeated criminality through committing treason and inciting insurrection."