Did she though?
Well now that I know people on Twitter said something and you don't like the guy's hair, I guess I should ignore this former lawyer's lively and cogent summary? 😆
It's a pretty big leap from "these swing states were all so compromised by fraud that our (Texas's) voters were disenfranchised" to "we don't like how they do voter id".
Your argument is that the Supreme Court would never take up any case, because a case with less merit could be brought that has similar features.
President Donald J. Trump (“President Trump”) is President of the United States of America and a natural person.
And we love him for it.
If they don't, they have to go back. And they can only come legally.
Yeah. Doesn't sound like it though, does it?
Is she talking a judge, or one of the attorneys for the opposition?
As if disenfranchising voters and rampant wrong doing aren't worth stamping out by themselves.
This "why wouldnt MSNBC show fraud if there really was any?" Thing is bonkers. People's willingness to blindly trust is amazing.
Why would they report it? Who the fuck are they anyway? Why would you automatically believe the man in the glowing picture box who is paid to tell you things?
You at least have to ask first: who paid him to tell me things, and why?
Is that you, Jordan Peterson?
Chinese communist tranny robots. My nightmare is coming true.
This shit is so old dude.
Laying here sick on my My Pillow listening to the My Pillow Guy 👌
Would be nice if looking like a God damn cartoon bandit with your face covered was evidence you were doing something nefarious, like it should be.
They put it up with a robot. What little bitches. Send Buzz back up there to kick that shit over.
They are making children afraid of human contact and being outside. Also hiding people's faces from them so they can't learn facial expressions and recognize strangers as human. It's fucked up.
Even I don't remember what my local liquor store clerk looks like, because he's been in a mask for 9 months.
This Brit seems kinda like a boss.
Starting to love Rudy as much as I love Trump. I adopt them both as my grandpas and they can come to my house for Christmas and have a beer.
Well, off the top of my head, it would seem possible to not press charges when there is clear evidence of self defense.
However, I'm not even saying that a legal proceeding is never warranted. What I am saying is that we should never lose sight of the fact that forcing an innocent person to defend themselves in court when they've done nothing wrong IS UNJUST.
Even if it is necessary in this case, for instance, it should be more blame laid at the feet of Kyle's attackers, and the judges, policemen, and lawyers should be sorry that they are doing it.
And if you think 2,000,000 dollars cash bail and imprisonment is the system working as it is intended for a 17 year old life guard offering medical care to strangers before being attacked by a mob, I think we disagree about the system.
Again, I did not advocate not obeying the law.
I would propose, however, that "polite society" needs to include a little more "Fuck you, this is wrong. Change it." And a little less bending over for corruption.
You appear to be talking like a good RINO, for whom the policy is: the Democrats make the laws match their whims, then the RINOs all say "We have to follow the laws, they can't just match our whims!"
Forcing someone to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars because they bore arms is an infringement of the right to bear arms.
I didn't actually say anything about breaking the law.
My point is that saying shit like "these are the consequences because it's the law, deal with it" is how we end up in a world of mask mandates, corrupt judges, infringements of the 2nd amendment etc. etc.
If something is wrong, it's fucking wrong. Including the law. And you and everyone else should see and feel that it's wrong.
That's not my point
Bingo. The rule should be cops have to be over 35, married with children, and have worked for a living.