1
KeksRUs 1 point ago +2 / -1

Thank you for catching that Fren, it just blew my mind!

2
KeksRUs 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for the breakdown. I heard some RINO on the radio yesterday talking down claims that Venezuela stole the election. I had thought there were only ties to dominion origins in Venezuela, but not that the country or bad actors in Venezuela were actually active in stealing the election. I still don’t see active Venezuelan interference in the report. Am I missing it? I figured the RINO was spreading misinformation to confuse the evidence.

2
KeksRUs 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can someone explain who these plaintiffs might be? This took an unexpected twist. Not only did they start trafficking the plaintiffs at 5yrs old and then were “repeatedly stalked, placed under unlawful surveillance, drugged, abducted and trafficked for sexual assault, abuse and exploitation at regular intervals over the course of 20 yrs,” BUT... “When the Plaintiffs could not be used for sex tracking exploitation, the Defendants exploited the Plaintiffs’ economic prowess and unique abilities to pick stocks, predict business/market trends, create very lucrative trade secrets, create lucrative intellectual property, and develop very profitable business concepts and consumer products in a diverse array of industries.”

1
KeksRUs 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is the longest god damn article I’ve ever tried to read. I just spent 30min reading and watching the video clips, and I still didn’t finish it.

TLDR - apparently John Sullivan has a republican brother James Sullivan involved with Proud Boys and a Utah militia (supposedly 30K strong, seems unlikely). If that is true I wouldn’t be surprised if both brothers are hired provocateurs to stir shit up on both sides. Some chick Sacker is doing a documentary on the feuding brothers and she is the one in the Capitol JaydenX video congratulating him.

2
KeksRUs 2 points ago +2 / -0

Right, if no one hits 270 then the state legislatures must vote is how I understood it. For which GOP holds majority, so I thought this was one path to victory. I could be wrong

1
KeksRUs 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don’t the machines print out the in-person ballots for the recounts and maybe for the adjudications as well? So of course the machines can read machine filled ballots. Would they have shredded the recount printed ballots and that is what we are seeing? Still probably illegal.

2
KeksRUs 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump dropped her name like 20 times, something tells me that his team has her and she started singing. To my knowledge she hasn’t been seen since the original video was presented at the hearing and went viral. I am hoping we see something big on her in the next two days.

by Wulkans
3
KeksRUs 3 points ago +4 / -1

No he needs a few others too, but this one is probably the easiest, plus Arizona and Nevada since the margin is so tight.

1
KeksRUs 1 point ago +1 / -0

Every time someone asks “how many votes” they have for anything, i.e. absentee, provisional, adjudicated, etc... the answer is always “I will have to get back to you on that.” You never hear the response if there ever is one.

1
KeksRUs 1 point ago +1 / -0

That was the first time I heard anyone really talk about removing the insides of the machines. Definitely interested to see if something is revealed on Wednesday

2
KeksRUs 2 points ago +3 / -1

“I’m sure your a fine lawyer, you have a great last name.” I’m not even sure what that comment meant but I still laughed out loud.

3
KeksRUs 3 points ago +3 / -0

Or simply wait until the polls close, see which registered voters didn’t show and then cast ballots in their names. That’s why the counting stopped.

2
KeksRUs 2 points ago +2 / -0

This made my god damn morning, which says a lot on Christmas morning.

1
KeksRUs 1 point ago +1 / -0

The problem is, Riggers all look alike.

1
KeksRUs 1 point ago +1 / -0

“Shutting”? The poll only has 49 respondents at the time of this comment.

But good poll, I like it

3
KeksRUs 3 points ago +3 / -0

I listened to the live stream on CBS, just the first option that came up in G search. When the live stream ended, I looked down at my phone only to see this headline: “Trump phones in false claims at Pennsylvania Senate committee hearing on voting "irregularities" https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/trump-giuliani-gettysburg-pennsylvania-hearing-election-issues-alleged-irregularities-live-stream-today-2020-11-25/ God Damn biased Fucks!

11
KeksRUs 11 points ago +11 / -0

And he says it so smugly too: Page 10: At the conclusion of the argument, I determined that an evidentiary hearing (previously scheduled to take place on November 19, 2020) was no longer needed and cancelled that proceeding.

2
KeksRUs 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good to know, thanks for the response!

view more: Next ›