14
Keln 14 points ago +14 / -0

They aren't racist per se. They are just incapable of loving people, because they hate themselves so much. People have become nothing but means to some end not even they know where it leads.

So the moment a group of people fall off the truck they put them on, they back up and run them over.

3
Keln 3 points ago +3 / -0

The Left doesn't understand actual charity. And at the same time casts hatred on ACB for being Catholic.

I'm no Catholic myself, I'm a Protestant, but even I know that the Catholic Church is famous for their charity towards children. The concepts of adoption and orphanages primarily came from the Catholic interpretation of Christian charity.

It should be no surprise that two wealthy devout catholics would adopt children like this.

To the left, all charity comes from the state. To a Christian, all charity comes from God, through those who serve Him.

2
Keln 2 points ago +2 / -0

What makes you think we don't understand that?

We should still comment on it and fight the false narratives.

2
Keln 2 points ago +2 / -0

All these constitutional scholars weighing in. Whatever shall we do? Lol

54
Keln 54 points ago +54 / -0

Yeah after driving through 6 states this week, any doubts that might have crept up recently were erased. The excitement level is far greater than 2016.

If pundits wonder how Trump wins again, they must all be staying in their basements like Joe.

1
Keln 1 point ago +1 / -0

The covid thing is pretty suspicious, but I've not seen any hard evidence that it was a man-made pandemic.

With that said I'd actually be surprised if it wasn't.

2
Keln 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only have to wait until after election results are confirmed.

16
Keln 16 points ago +16 / -0

We had a bunch of no good rino swamp creatures in the house who opposed Trump. One of the reasons we lost the house in 2018 midterms was that a lot of those guys either "retired" or were voted out.

Winning back the house means installing new blood and a congress that will actually work with Trump, not against him.

3
Keln 3 points ago +3 / -0

Over the past week I drove through Northern Virginia, Western Maryland, Northern West Virginia, all over Ohio, Southern Michigan, and Western and Central Pennsylvania (was a long work week).

I watched for signs as I always do traveling this year. I saw a few Biden signs, usually one or two here and there. I saw one at a farm north of Youngstown, which really looked out of place. All were professionally made and small.

When it came to Trump signs, it would be more accurate to say there were near as many Trump signs as mile markers that I passed. Professionally made, home made, memes blown up and printed, old signs reused with 2020 written on them, Trump flags, bumper stickers, even a cardboard cutout of Trump.

There was a town in northern Ohio near Lake Erie where the highway I was on went right through the center of town and on both sides was all Trump signs and American flags, multiple at each house.

This wasn't isolated to rural areas. I saw a lot of Trump signs in Detroit and the suburbs north of there, but not much Biden.

Signs don't prove anything. But what I've been seeing is very different from 2016. There is little to no open support for the Democrat, but tons for Trump.

7
Keln 7 points ago +7 / -0

Trump is giving him an out by demanding a drug test...an out he can't take, and any other excuses to cancel will look like he's afraid of the drug test.

"Heads I win, tails you lose" move for Trump. I think the debate has to happen now.

2
Keln 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not. She's a completely safe pick. Anyone who attacks her without something to go on is taking a risk.

That will change if the Left comes up with some bogus narrative, but considering they've had a solid week to prepare talking points as well as since the last nomination to look into her, I'm guessing they got nothing other than lame stuff like her being catholic...which nobody cares about.

I also suspect that the less ideological among the Democrat elite know damn well that pulling another Kavanaugh, especially on a woman, is political suicide right now.

7
Keln 7 points ago +7 / -0

To make a funny meme you need two things; an element of truth and a sense of humor.

Leftists have neither.

1
Keln 1 point ago +1 / -0

Regardless of her political opinions and what I would call judicial malfeasance, what has been said about her by those who knew her best convinces me she said no such thing.

I'm sure a healthy, upright RBG not on her deathbed might utter something like that, but on her deathbed it would be the furthest thing from her mind.

To the Left nothing is sacred, and anything can be desecrated, if it furthers their quest for power.

1
Keln 1 point ago +1 / -0

The idea that the nazis were right wing is a leftist lie. National Socialism was a competing socialist ideology with a lot in common with their communist competition.

7
Keln 7 points ago +7 / -0

Honestly the KKK is a poor comparison for Antifa. It's kind of apples and oranges. It's better to compare Antifa to the early Brownshirts (the Nazi SA) and the Blackshirts (the Italian MVSN) prior to their parties solidifying power.

Antifa itself was really the German Communists (KPD) equivalent of the SA in the early 1930s and used the exact same tactics (obviously not as successfully) such as intimidation, disruption, and suppression. Pretty much mirror images of each other as organizations.

Obviously modern Antifa is...not quite the same as the old one, but it's really the same in spirit. Pro-communist and willing to use violence and any other means to reach their goals.

8
Keln 8 points ago +8 / -0

Let's face it. It's white leftists who go on about "cultural appropriation". The rest of humanity considers it cultural appreciation.

3
Keln 3 points ago +3 / -0

Media, even when bias is not a factor, have surprisingly low standards. Especially when it comes to "breaking news" and the rush to be the first to report it.

Pranksters have been taking advantage of that for years.

19
Keln 19 points ago +19 / -0

Well you have at least after the election to wait for that.

President Trump had too many things to accomplish to be a 1 term President, and the real fight against the corrupt government is the most dangerous fight he will ever take on. There's no sense in taking that on prior to the election and risk the public thinking he is just going after political enemies.

4 years of constant evidence, plus all of the things he and his circle knows that the public does not, plus reelection puts him in a perfect position to bring the hammer.

But doing it now is premature and an unnecessary gamble to take while all of the ineffectual gambling is being made by the Democrats at this point.

You gotta keep in mind, it has taken about 50 years to get this level of corruption in place. President Trump will basically have to spend his entire 2nd term trying to bring them down. And it's entirely possible he could get impeached and convicted if things don't move right. There are plenty of Republicans who have various masters of their own who might choose to pull that string under the right circumstances.

Because there is no doubt if high level government officials start getting serious indictments, they'll flip on those "masters" in a heartbeat. Admitting corruption is a better path than going down for treason, and the people who pull their strings know that. They aren't going to jail if they can do anything about it.

12
Keln 12 points ago +12 / -0

You know, the name "Trump", before he became president, was something corporations had to pay a bunch of money to use, as a recognized brand.

I'm not saying these nations, including Israel, aren't sincere in wanting to honor the man, but they are sort of getting a good brand for free here.

4
Keln 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's insider trading and an incredibly obvious example of it that would spark investigations. There's also a lot of rules when it comes to company executives selling shares that would make it very difficult to pull off, not to mention the payoff would likely not be worth the crime.

All of these major companies who do these things that hurt their own companies do so with full support of their boards, because they are looking at the long term. The wokeism is a form of investment in their minds. Once they can push things over the edge politically and setup whatever pseudo-oligarchy they believe they can build out of the ashes, they figure they can pretty much control what people are allowed to (or have to) pay for and any previous losses will not matter.

The people with the money and power behind these things don't care at all about the Leftist ideology or the social justice garbage. Black lives (or any lives) don't "matter" to them. Any particular countries don't matter either. And while sure, there are likely some pedos among them, and it might be something they use to control certain people in useful positions (among other means of blackmail), they aren't pushing it because they are all pedos.

They just understand that to destroy a strong society built on individual liberty, you have to disintegrate its foundations. And they understand that the United States specifically is a complete roadblock to any concept of global power-grabbing. So they are systematically attacking every moral building block our Republic stands on.

The real power behind all of it aren't "commies". They're evil people who want to carve up global power and wealth for themselves. One method is as good as another to them. It's plain wickedness and selfishness, nothing more.

3
Keln 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good question. A publicly funded university should not be making political contributions.

-1
Keln -1 points ago +2 / -3

There's a difference between individual charity and forcing others to pay for importing poor people.

8
Keln 8 points ago +10 / -2

I haven't seen any solid argument against Barrett and the Left froths at the mouth at the sound of her name. The more I read about Lagoa, the more I like her as well.

It seems to me that both are solid picks. And no, I don't see adoption of Haitian children following a catastrophic natural disaster as any blemish on her character. On the contrary, it's an example of Christian charity that has been practiced by Christians for a very long time.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›