Promoting the website might go against the advertising prohibition. Otherwise you are correct.
Because the story isn't over yet . . .
Trump team needs to include this article as evidence if they can argue any of their cases before SCOTUS.
I agree with you. I was being sarcastic ;)
Because this one has been fact checked and found to be altered and inaccurate.
Marbury was a just decision. The legislature cannot be a self-regulating body. If it makes you feel better, replace the word constitutional with legal. Legislatures cannot be permitted to pass laws that conflict with existing laws, including mandates in the U.S. Constitution.
Yes. Insulin is for HYPERglycemia, to metabolize elevated blood sugar. HYPOglycemia is low blood sugar level when you should have something with sugar content like orange juice to raise blood sugar to a normal level.
I switched to diet a decade ago. Not that it's any better if course. Been reducing my intake over the last couple years. It's about habit. Keep an alternative available. Iced tea, water, whatever. They know their marketing. If they make it easily accessible they know they can break you.
Not the Senate's job anyway to determine constitutionality. That's what the judiciary is for.
Could be IP, but would think they combine that with other identifying profile info like birthday or something. What if multiple people in house have accounts and using same IP? Everyone gets banned for what you post?
It's cancelling the cancel culture.
I think his comment, in response to being asked about it, was that he hadn't ruled it out. Not exactly an all in commitment. But getting to the bottom of the 2020 fraud would go along way to bolstering support for 2024.
Don't think they are even teachers. Title says they are school board members.
Also, Bill Clinton was impeached on 2 charges by the House. Could make a case that this bill affects him too. Start the tap dancing bitches!
It also specifies that it applies only on or before the date enacted. So that would very narrowly limit it to only one person that qualifies. It's a bullshit bill and would get tossed out of court if passed.
Do you use the same e-mail or phone # for both accounts?
And even if you delete your accounts they're still making money on you until you scrub all the cookies off your devices.
Then you make a plain Jane work account. If it's needed for work then you shouldn't be doing personal stuff on it anyway. It's pretty common to have multiple e-mails. Needs to be more common to have multiple social media accounts for different purposes.
Thanks for link. Better example at 3:52 pm.
aNd bY thE WaY, tHaT's FiRsT lAdY dOcToR jiLl bIdEn tO yOu!!!!!!!
THAT'S DR. JILL TO YOU! REEEEEEEEEE!
That just reveals the problem, that many of them never tell us who they really are when asking for our votes.
Tāmen dōu jiāng hěn kuài huí dào qīxī dì
他们都将很快回到栖息地
Yep, California thinks a controlled burn is for Federal dollars.