Read the 25 Point Plan of National Socialism. I think you'll be surprised to find that National Socialism is very different from what you were told.
Try the 25 Point Plan of National Socialism.
https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSDAP_25_points_manifesto
"From trusted sources." "Oh, you don't trust them? Well, you don't count."
The sooner we disobey and fight back, the sooner things can return to normal.
Melinda Gates (Bill Gates's "wife") is also a man.
Here's a relevant Ricky Gervais quote I like regarding his belief about death: "Being dead is like being stupid; it is only painful for others."
Missed opportunity. Smh.
What does "transform your TV into a free speech device" mean?
Reality almost seems more absurd than Weekly World News stories. What a world.
Ah, close sources. Reminds me a lot of the "anonymous sources" that were the foundation for RussiaGate.
Hey bucko! Would you like to be speaking German right now? I bet you never thought of that! Check mate. /s
The people deciding this are going to shuffle their feet until the deadline is near, and then they will make up an excuse for why a large number of the signatures are invalid. Then they will say whoops, better luck next time!
Even if there are good jews, how do you tell them apart from the bad jews when the bad jews always pretend to be good jews?
The jews get a lot of their power by making themselves victims. Their victimhood status lets them avoid being questioned or criticized which lets them get away with a lot more. They created the Holocaust hoax and used it to demonize Whites, especially any White that stands up for himself. If any person (white especially) makes an unflattering observation about jews or questions them, he will be depicted by their press machine as some evil person that wants to genocide jews for no reason and it shuts down discussion. The usual bogus reason they claim is that antisemites only dislike jews because they are jealous of their success. They also claim that the main reason they are so overrepresented in powerful, influential, and cushy positions is because they are so much smarter than non-jews. Not because of their their tribalism, victimhood, control of finance and other institutions, and their double dealing.
What does Coulter have to do with Biden being president? The election was rigged.
Places that secede can have their own elections.
I took the time to explain to you the things I wrote. All you are doing right now is making charges without giving an explanation, which totally useless to me. The reason you don't have an explanation is because your position is not well thought out. It's a regurgitated position. That was precisely the kind of thinking I was trying to help people escape by showing how the left-wing paradigm inhibits nuanced political understanding. You have an autistic obsession with the misleading left to right political spectrum and it has caused you to miss the point completely. You are either an example victim of what I was talking about or a shill. I won't waste any more time with you so don't bother replying.
I can explain what I mean for those examples I used.
The guy I first replied to said right wing authoritarianism is any oxymoron. This means that, according to him, the less authoritarian you are the more right wing you are. So I talked about libertarianism, the most anti-authoritarian ideology there is. And among libertarians there are many who subscribe to several ideas that are also shared by democrats. The reason I pointed this out was to show that thinking about politics in terms of how far left or right ideologies and issues fit on the political spectrum is subjective and misleading.
What differentiates libertarianism from traditional GOP conservatives most of all is a permissive attitude (in the ways that liberals are permissive, not the ways they aren't e.g. liberals desire to censor speech). GOP conservatives are more puritanical compared to libertarians and are more likely to object to obscene content.
The reason for all this is because libertarianism revolves around the ideal of maximizing freedom for everyone in all ways that don't violate the non aggression principle. Now the way this is interpreted by individual libertarians varies. That's why what I said was a generalization as I know it doesn't describe all libertarians perfectly.
But this ideal of maximizing freedom for everyone is why libertarians are more likely to have a laissez-faire "what homosexuals do in their own bedrooms is their business" attitude than the more puritanical GOP conservatives, although the latter group seems to have adopted this attitude more over the years.
"Libertarians don't believe in all that (abortion for example is a net reduction in liberty once you consider the liberty of the child)."
The abortion issue could be interpreted differently than you did by a libertarian who prioritized the freedom of the mother over that of her unborn.
What are the ramifications of Trump getting "impeached?" It seems to me like a pointless, solely symbolic gesture. Help me understand if I'm missing something.
Very good comment.
"Not only does it reduce critical thinking on a per-issue basis it also strips each issue of nuance as the division comes down to unreconcilable regurgitation of the same conservative and liberal talking points."
I wonder if the two party system was designed partially for that purpose.
One thing Norm MacDonald said that has always stuck with me is, he was asked whether he was a Democrat or a Republican and he said neither. IIRC, his reasoning was that he thought it was ridiculous for someone to be expected to subscribe to the entire "basket of beliefs" of either party, because surely there must be at least one issue that a person disagrees with the party on.
Libertarians are the most anti-authoritarian group there is yet they share several beliefs with democrats like legalizing drugs, permissiveness towards sexual deviance and abortion, being non-religious, freedom for all kinds of obscenity, anti-militarism etc. The left-right paradigm is a deceptive snipe hunt for understanding politics because it can't be plotted out neatly on a chart as it's extremely subjective. It's better to leave the left-right categorization alone and only judge issues on their own merits, because the left-right paradigm does have some influence on people to accept or reject ideas based on where they believe they fall on the political spectrum; not the ideas alone.
There should be a website for debunking the debunkers. That way people can share links to show others how full of shit the debunkers are.
Yes, Americans became so health conscious all of a sudden!