Institutions in Michigan don't have a choice but to act on it.
WRT other states, the MI ruling can be used as precedence. It's not binding, but it still carries a lot of weight.
I never suggested the ruling would have anything to do with overturning the election. That's the point. We need to get beyond that fantasy and work in the real world now.
Should we assume everything she has written is bull-shit because she didn't accept Jesus as her savior?
Stalin and Mao were atheists as well. Do you think if Ayn joined them for dinner they'd get along swimmingly?
I will never discount the wisdom of anyone based on religious beliefs.
This is real world politics.
Whining pussies with big-dick bravado aren't going to fix anything.
Draw yourself a nice warm bubble bath, pour yourself a glass of wine, light some candles, click on the Cher link, call a girlfriend and have a nice long cry.
This is big, because it gives credibility to the concept that the system is flawed.
We'll fight to fix it while you hang back and whine about how unfair it was.
You can fight the dead on yesterday's battlefield, but that's a job for historians - not soldiers.
I'm correct. Have any evidence to suggest otherwise?