/u/LOLZLOSERS

| comments | posts
GEOTUS retweets activated ACB by teleomorph
▲ -69 ▼
deleted -69 points ago +1 / -70
GEOTUS retweets activated ACB by teleomorph
▲ -4 ▼
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
TRUMP needs YOU! Contact your state AG's office! Join the TEXAS lawsuit! Links in comments. by Thundercles
▲ -4 ▼
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
by SwarmIntel
▲ -10 ▼
deleted -10 points ago +2 / -12
At the last minute, Pennsylvania FINALLY filed their brief, as requested by SCOTUS, and this is basically what they came up with... by HeavenlyTrumpets
▲ -6 ▼
deleted -6 points ago +3 / -9
by 6ased
▲ -4 ▼
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
This. "SCOTUS rejected the Kelly case without any explanation or dissents, probably because, more or less, the same context is covered in the Texas case, but with a wider scope affecting more states." by TheCastle
▲ -4 ▼
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
Based Clarence by letsfinishthis
▲ -3 ▼
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
by TheDynamis
▲ -7 ▼
deleted -7 points ago +1 / -8
New Q drop today! “We’re not going to take it” by NewsomIsAsshoe
▲ -4 ▼
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PREPARE. ORGANIZE. FIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!! by Equityopinion
▲ -3 ▼
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
Shills are posting fake news that SCOTUS rejected the PA case. These are lies. FYI by Thlayli
▲ -5 ▼
deleted -5 points ago +1 / -6
Just A Reminder- Any "order" or law going against the Constitution, IS ILLEGAL by Five5dancingizrays
▲ -4 ▼
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
Can we get a CALM YOURSELF stickie? by orange_kek_great
▲ -4 ▼
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
by Trumpublican22
▲ -2 ▼
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
He denied the plaintiff's emergency injunction request. The case is alive and pending. Mark Levin is right, journalists are too stupid or too lazy to understand what is going on. by LeviC
▲ -28 ▼
deleted -28 points ago +1 / -29
NO DOOM ! NOTHING DEVASTATING HAPPENED ! CHILL by ANTI_Globalist12
▲ -2 ▼
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
by CAPTAIN_TENDY_PLATE
▲ -2 ▼
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
Jay Sekulow has entered the chat: "The lawsuit filed by Texas against other states as a matter of original jurisdiction at the Supreme Court is a critical case, aiming to defend the Constitution against violations of the law by other states and protect the integrity of our elections." by PlateOwner
▲ -14 ▼
deleted -14 points ago +1 / -15
by cyberrush
▲ -1 ▼
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
Why does negative (but relevant) news never get stickied? It’s important to know what is actually happening... by USANumber1
▲ -1 ▼
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
by RedBloodedMeatEater
▲ -4 ▼
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
SCOTUS DENIED PA GOP EXPLANATION: An injunctive relief is ONLY granted if there are no other legal options available. Certification is only the beginning of the litigation process. So this decision was expected and is meaningless. Texas suit is the game changer. THIS IS NOT A DOOMER RULING by JohnBarron
▲ -1 ▼
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
SCOTUS DENIED PA GOP EXPLANATION: An injunctive relief is ONLY granted if there are no other legal options available. Certification is only the beginning of the litigation process. So this decision was expected and is meaningless. Texas suit is the game changer. THIS IS NOT A DOOMER RULING by JohnBarron
▲ -2 ▼
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
SCOTUS DENIED PA GOP EXPLANATION: An injunctive relief is ONLY granted if there are no other legal options available. Certification is only the beginning of the litigation process. So this decision was expected and is meaningless. Texas suit is the game changer. THIS IS NOT A DOOMER RULING by JohnBarron
▲ -1 ▼
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
view more: Next ›