4
LadyAlamo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fuck off Google. There is 26 million of us here. Like you legit give a shit about that kind of number.

Put up or shut up.

4
LadyAlamo 4 points ago +4 / -0

The guy is a ceo of a pillow business.

2
LadyAlamo 2 points ago +2 / -0

What do you want him to say? "As I said for many months, the dems had the ability to cheat the system, unfortunately there was nothing available to us to block this. The courts have refused on technicalities, and we just can't seem to find another way. We havent been able to catch and put anyone away. Even Hillary. I wrote the IA and again, I just can't get it done. My supporters and my ego will not allow me to say Biden won. It will literally make them vomit. I trusted Pence. We all did and he followed his rule to a tee. It really sucks he did that. Maybe he could of found a technicality himself- but he didn't.

The blocked me from Twitter and social media and I didn't preplan for that. Plus it really was over and again im just not going to utter the words.

We love you"

6
LadyAlamo 6 points ago +6 / -0

I will agree it doesn't make sense. However i suggested thats because its a flip.

The whole of america 'were outraged'. It was a media's wet dream.

He disowned it (even though he arranged everyone to be there) He had to ask everyone to go home (because 80% of the footage were wearing classic maga attire)

The military was to reinforce the wetdream. And absolutely end any potential of any further demonstration.

1
LadyAlamo 1 point ago +2 / -1

They are gonna run over you (maga) with tanks regardless. The merge just makes it somewhat more difficult.

I say you - as im Australian. Im WAGA - wanting america great again.

1
LadyAlamo 1 point ago +3 / -2

Its not politically correct, I offer no apology, his quite something to look at.

3
LadyAlamo 3 points ago +3 / -0

The military were there because the government has lost control of the people.

Spin it what ever way you want. It was not just antifa and co in the capital. It was fucking not. And it was not antifa that called them there that day. He lost control.

See the same response to the behaviour in Portland today? No. Because they don't give a shit and arnt threatened. Those streets are the people's. The capital is theirs.

2
LadyAlamo 2 points ago +2 / -0

This has been shared for a while. It is interesting!

For me however the real fascinating part is "...Trump, and I do not even know who he really is"

Pretty much got the play down to a tee - so this line is intentionally ambiguous.

Doesn't know who Donald Trump is? How is that possible?

Or doesn't know who the man is? Meaning not literally but are they shady? Legit? (I cant think of the right word here. Is it questioning the person)

1
LadyAlamo 1 point ago +1 / -0

I actually believe something happened prior to that.

Its been reported he was an hour late. The speeches given that day - before the Capital - were bizarre and not at all what they suggested they would be.

He said he was going to march WITH the people -peacefully, and he didn't. This was confirmed by AJ.

Since that day - away from the social bans the team have been VERY quiet. Barely any talk about the steal. New evidence? Where is it?

Another poster here who has been in contact with the team for evidence THEY have confirms something very strange occurred that day They have been trying to get their evidence out and epoch times dropped them. No one wants to know about it. Even Trumps team.

1
LadyAlamo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because how many people did it capture?

There isn't much in this world that doesn't rely on marketing. The better the marketing the more successful the "sell"

How would Trump of preformed the last 5 years WITH social media interaction or alike as its been the last few weeks?

2
LadyAlamo 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is the approach i had as well.

But by this logic Sidney just dismissing her Georgia case - she didn't prove it. I feel like she is saying its not there.

And its bullshit!!

2
LadyAlamo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Although I appricate your post and it has give me a bit to ponder

I would like you to explain what is means should Biden be inaugurated. All the points you make are valid assuming your correct. Yet if your not - what do you conclude it means?

3
LadyAlamo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Unless Epstein or Tupac turns up im not watching.

2
LadyAlamo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agree.

If you watch SNA your considered far right in Oz. People who share your views enjoy it also.

If you watch MSM you are on 'the better political side being the left, and just a better standard of person' Or so the story goes.

2
LadyAlamo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Reading your reply is a roller coaster. I want off! I knew something really shifted on the 6th. And I mean away from the EC votes. Something happened before the speeches started. Your account confirms it.

Yet you say their is people still fighting and this is all it takes.

5
LadyAlamo 5 points ago +5 / -0

His dropped cases that were in the system pending.

Every legal avenue would involve getting those machines and auditing them. Didnt do it.

I think he had a crack.

1
LadyAlamo 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)

It was on the video of the interview with right side broadcast (? I think it was them)

Real recent. Maybe 48 hours ago. I think it was my Sunday which is americas Saturday. If I find a link I'll come back with it.

I made a post this morning (sorry time difference again) after driving thoughts to work. I actually think his taken a deal. There was lots of chatter they were coming for him. Every legal way possible. I think he may of taken a deal to stop the steal talk and be silent. Walk away. And I think it was agreed before the 6th. Because since that day- all those speeches, something has changed drastically for almost all of them.

1
LadyAlamo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unless they delete saved posts again ill be following for your updates whenever you are safe to do so :)

I wish I knew the answer. I hope these people you are in contact with are going to stay the course.

10
LadyAlamo 10 points ago +10 / -0

Maybe I have missed a recent happening with Liddell.

His follow up after being at the white house didn't convey this message at all.

He made clear he was trying to deliver proof. So that would mean Trump didn't already have it. He made clear he was not given much time and respect and I think he said Trump was interested in some social media thing/free speech thing and not the steal things.

2
LadyAlamo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Great. Now im going to be sitting on here all night waiting for it to come.

1
LadyAlamo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also what about the other teams who participated in the hearings? Some of them posted on this page - unfortunately I dont have the saved posts after the Mod clean.

But they were absolutely on this site- had been on the hearings and were available to contact.

1
LadyAlamo 1 point ago +1 / -0

You should repost this. I know many will be interested in your story and will be following it on.

Maybe reach out here again.

There is ALWAYS a way. Aint nothing impossible.

view more: Next ›