THAT HYPOTHETICAL QUESTION SHOULD OF BEEN OBJECTED.
What would of happened if Brad Rattsarse would of buckled to pressure?
Defence should of highlighted the Navarro report. Should of highlighted that very call proves each party had different numbers of fraud. Should of questioned why there was different numbers.
Should of highlighted that Trump asking for exact numbers was a play of English language because he was coming from a position where he believed 10x that number existed.
Its all in the damn tape. And report and if hypnotical is now allowed can we get ask would would of happened if the Navarro report was available and if Rattsarse had the same numbers of fraud as Trumps team?
If Patrick Bryne is telling the truth with his account of events- Flynn surely has washed his hands of it all
I think Flynn and Powell however are starting a cause - like defend the constitution. I might have my names mixed up.
She deserves the opportunity to rest in peace. Her family deserve the opportunity to mourn her peacefully.
Talk of her, in this political scene, is grossly disrespectful.
She was willing to risk her life via the choices she made. The environment and conditions are widely different since that day. We now have lawyers defending Trump say "the people have spoken and voted Biden".
Its wrong. Her family will never recover from this. Either will the people. We all saw the footage. We all understood her motive -even if misguided- its reasonable she acted on defending her rights. With her professional background its believable she felt a duty.
TO ABANDON THAT ON HER DEATH IS A TERRIBLE TERRIBLE THING.
I think you have your answer.
'Read between the lines' Trump said all he was going to say Jan 6th. And all he has said since - is literally all his said. It ain't much but its fact.
Don't wait another day to do whatever is best for yourself and your family. Trump (if that is what you admire) has not waited himself.
Live your life, stop letting anyones "marketing spin" hold you at ransom. If Trump or anyone else comes out with something your interested in get on board! But waiting to hear it - your way to sensible for that, I can tell just by your reply.
The negative nancy in me says "the best is yet to come" is a marketing spin. Along the same lines as "it will be wild" "release the kraken" "drain the swamp" and so on.
Its meant to appeal to you. But you are not meant to try decode it. Its not a code. Thats like trying to decode Gilette: the best a man can get. No. You are meant to simply beleive Gillette is the best you can buy- we know there is no underlying code there. Same/same.
Imagine Trump with out the 'make America great again'. Slogans are important for people and for marketing.
If hopium is what you need im all for it. But don't think thats where you should get your supply from. His got a bad mix. All kinds of shady crap in that.
Find yourself a premium provider and know your getting 100% A grade.
Thank you for the reminder.
I swear quite a lot. Its pretty standard in Australia. It used incorrectly by a world standard but not offensive here at all. Ofcourse you can be offensive swearing at someone. Its confusing- i don't know how to explain it.
Just thank you for reminding me.
Wait. Do we agree? Or disagree?! :)
I would like to hear you opinions- you dont like Brynes account- so what do you think really happened? And we agree on the courts- do you have any opinion on what the OP wrote? "What is really going on here?"
Reading Byrne's posts it actually reads to me as excatly whats happening. Its felt like a cluster fuck from the outside. It reads like a cluster fuck from his account. It seems to make alot of sense in my opinion. Which is quote hollowing.
An election was stolen. For months the president spoke of it. Even months prior! The cases. The courts. The rally on the 6th. The Rudy vs. Sidney. The Pence. The media. The people. The EOs. The silence. The noise. The lack of anything actually substantial. Here we are early Feb and not a thing has changed. The last time the Right gathered together as a unit was the 6th.
Bryne - as disappointing as it is- to me reads like a fair portrayal of what it was. Because if it wasn't you could read it and say no way. But you can't because it seems to be the only viable explanation left.
I guess so? If your buying his books.
Im staying my course. I have preferences for all kinds of stuff - like anyone else! I dont like Gagas political position, I dont avoid her music because of it. I avoid her music because its terrible. (Although she has a voice on her if im being fair but her music is not for me at all)
I do however see instances where your opinions on things can change when you learn more about an individual. For me - I used to love following the Royal family - but when I learnt more about what happened with Diana and 'her story ive never felt the same as a result. I dont know what product I could avoid? But I wouldn't be interested in seeing Windsor on holidays again? Not the same I guess but similar concept.
Hmm - its a interesting conversation.
If I don't have similar political views as SK im fine with that lol, I dont share political views with a lot of people. I wont lose sleep over it. But I have enjoyed heaps of his books.
Dean Koontz (sp?) Is another author i read a lot of years ago. Its fucking ok to like an authors work and have that seperate from them politically.
Just the same as my pillows. You can buy a fucking pillow if you like it regardless of the guys political views who makes it. Really spiteful how shot happens these days.
This guy gets it.