Like being a Brady fan in all those Patriots superbowls. Especially the one where they were down big to the Falcons at half...

If the same ratios (and golden ratio) are in even a single other state that would be the real smoking gun in my mind

The main points i took from this were:

1. Repeating ratios presented that are statistically improbable.

2. The multiple instances of this also presented a relationship, suggesting the use of a wheel (to better hide the fraud)

If you have 5,000,000 votes reporting at numbers between 800 and 9,000 at a time, but always in different quantities, it is statistically improbable for there to be any ratios that are exactly the same.

If there are a lot of ratios that are the same (for example (550 votes come in / 500 for biden and 50 for trump, we get a ratio of .09090909). If another set of votes come in and bear the same exact ratio its highly suspicious, because those odds are so great. The more times it happens the more the odds become like winning the lottery and suggest foul play. So if the next vote received is (913 votes / 830 for biden and 83 for trump, we get the exact same ratio of .09090909) and we know there is funny business.

The wheel concept takes the concept a little deeper. The above example would be way too obvious, so instead the algorithms takes various ratios along a wheel that ultimately result in all of the hijacked votes averaging the .09090909 ratio (or as poster claims 14.7% for trump) that the algorithm wanted.

Did that help at all?

Exactly. This is where i think his sleep deprivation was taking over. I also caught that. I think the bigger point (and he made it earlier in the video) was that the same ratios were presenting multiple times and being shared in multiple precincts, which based on total votes is statistically improbable (perhaps impossible). Additionally, those repeating ratios shared a factorial with other repeating ratios that suggested a wheel was used.

I agree, as the data and analysis is very interesting. I do agree with a lot of comments on here that say simplification is critical here.

Having watched the whole video, there were a couple of instances where the poster made an error (like around the smoking gun 1:06 timeframe) and admittedly said he was sleep deprived while presenting. Coupled with the length of the video and complexity of the analysis, will be difficult to digest for many.

But the best way to get simplification is for as many people as possible to see this post and help simplify.

I had heard before of a more simplified algorithm that just counted every biden vote as 1.3 and took the increase over 1 that biden received from trump (if 100 votes split 60/40 trump/biden, algorithm runs and makes it 52/48 biden/trump - 40x1.3=52, 12 increase to biden taken from trump so 60-12=48).

This idea of a virtual precinct and wheel is a more sophisticated and likely far less detectable version of that idea. Overall the presentation was good but it needs to be greatly simplified.