2
Leadforpeds 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hope they make lists, saves us the trouble of finding them ourselves. It's like Amazon Prime for traitors.

1
Leadforpeds 1 point ago +1 / -0

If anyone wants to gain some real fame on social media you should start doing noise tutorials. Gonna be real popular pretty soon.

2
Leadforpeds 2 points ago +3 / -1

Literally nothing. It's just a formality. Probably a huge waste of money too. Quit worrying so much

4
Leadforpeds 4 points ago +4 / -0

You obviously didn't read it. It says "This is in no way declaring a presidential winner," if you read the entire letter. It's just a formality and likely a waste of money from an agency I've never even heard of

3
Leadforpeds 3 points ago +5 / -2

Not really. It says in the event of a transition

3
Leadforpeds 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm trying to buy some of their peppermint mocha, but the page says 404. Do they have a customer support number or email?

1
Leadforpeds 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are 10 billion posts about this

3
Leadforpeds 3 points ago +3 / -0

If I see one more of these posts I'm gonna be triggered and start literally shaking

1
Leadforpeds 1 point ago +1 / -0

Assuming it's a normal 308 win, I can't help you. Try online, I haven't seen any in store for 2 months

by Tarkus
1
Leadforpeds 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not happening shill

1
Leadforpeds 1 point ago +1 / -0

She is working with them, but not under their payroll. They are going for the same goal. Don't worry

1
Leadforpeds 1 point ago +1 / -0

His middle name is Swanson?

8
Leadforpeds 8 points ago +10 / -2

Everyone is acting like they denounced Rittenhouse or something. They just said they aren't associated with him. I know, not ideal, but you guys are freaking out over small stuff rather than focusing on the massive fraud taking place

by fkkin
1
Leadforpeds 1 point ago +1 / -0

You could have just said problem of evil. From an atheistic standpoint you cannot have any objective morality, so that's not a judgement you can make.

1
Leadforpeds 1 point ago +2 / -1

Should've kept it as categorical answers rather than throwing in the percentages. They can be unclear and confusing to the subjects. Categories like those in the parentheses or a simple a little to alot type answers would be better for a survey. Did you specify whether those percentages were national or statewide? 3% nationally is alot, so is statewide depending on the state

1
Leadforpeds 1 point ago +1 / -0

My ultra right wing grandpa voted for Obama in 08. He fought against the civil rights movement and voted for a black president. You're telling me the man who changed that kind of vote was surpassed by the embodiment of old and unlikable?

3
Leadforpeds 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sidney Powell said they would be criminals if they certified, so Kemp said he wouldn't until an audit.

1
Leadforpeds 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unless we repeal the 22nd amendment, only two terms sadly

2
Leadforpeds 2 points ago +2 / -0

Didn't they retract that

7
Leadforpeds 7 points ago +7 / -0

The best analogy I'v seen for this recount is being given 10 counterfeit bills, and instead of inspecting the bills you just count them and say "Yep, 10 bills."

3
Leadforpeds 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump being the legitimate president plus civil war seems like the best case scenario. Great reset of the American system, in a good way

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›