Whichever company figures out a way to block commercials on cable and streaming will get insanely rich.
That being said, yeah, these commercials are weird because they feel extremely forced. People shouldn't be made to feel strange if their partners are the same, or different, ancestry.
This runs both ways. I've been in a few "interracial relationships" and honestly think the idea of cultural differences based on race alone are overblown, unless the partner is from a different country altogether.
Been there, done that, and let me say I generally don't pursue women from (as in born and raised in) foreign countries anymore, especially asian countries like I would've when I was younger. Some say that's racist, but it's really just cultural for me. Relationships like that are riddled with misunderstandings and culture clash.
Huh. I've never heard that one before.
I don't see any problem with "race mixing" if it's done by choice, and I'm pretty sure it would take hundreds of generations for a country like America to look the same. Even if we did look all the same, we'd all be different from region, state, individually, etc.
Look at Brazil. Mixing was actively and strongly pushed for generations, and their all still incredibly different.
Liberation Theology was created by the Soviet Union to spread communism in "Latin America."
It has unfortunately infiltrated the Church and certain Catholic orders.
The USSR used citizens from their Romanian block to accomplish this. Their thinking was that Romanians had the most cultural similarity to "Latin Americans," partially because Romanian is a Latin language, so it'd be easier for them to learn spanish than a Russian learning Spanish.
It's almost a miracle Brazil is pulling itself out of their mess. That country was going to transition from socialism to actual communism. Bolsonaro/Hamilton will probably become legends to their people.
It makes me feel great to see other countries succeed. It makes feel even better when BRICS countries that, according to "experts," were supposed to "challenge" America embrace us!
Brazil 💚 India 🧡 China GTFO
Eh, yeah good point. I just made the comment without checking.
Turns out that he was a repeat offender, and Louisiana has very harsh repeat offender laws.
Guy needs to get it together, but I personally think life for two dime bags is insane.
I come from a state with a more lenient view of marijuana to be transparent with you.
But you just did essentially the same thing by saying "People have differing views on abortion."
No, it's not the same thing. It's nonsense.
Now the only thing we are arguing about is if it is justified to start a civil war over it and to trample all over the constitution. If you support Abe and his legacy, you believe it is justified. Simple as that.
No, we're not.
Your post was about Lincoln's legacy. My views on whether abortion justifies a civil war have no bearing on whether Lincoln was a good president or not. I actually think it's somewhat subjective myself, and history is never completely black or white as we all know.
If you think Lincoln was a bad president, fine. I think Lincoln was a good president, and trying to persuade me otherwise by misrepresenting my words, thoughts, and character won't work.
We disagree and that's that.
“People have differing views on slavery”
Where did I say that? Show me where I said that, liar. Show me.
“People have differing views on slavery”, said nobody reasonable ever. This is enough to know there is no reasoning with you. This is a simple test to cut through all the BS and mental gymnastics. It works every time
Again, show me where I said that people have differing views of slavery.
I did say that people have differing views of abortion. That is not the same thing as saying "people have different views of slavery."
You're lying and puting words in my mouth.
Why are you deliberately misrepresenting my words? Are you deliberately trying to gaslight me?
You should have absolutely zero reason to flat-out lie if you're trying to reason with me.
You love Lincoln crushing states rights, which was freedom being crushed.
More mind reading. How do you know this?
You haven’t said anything about abortion, but it is worse than slavery and you won’t call it out as justifying civil war.
Alright, what is your point? Do I have to say it's justification for civil war? This conversation was never about abortion, whether or not I think it's worse than slavery, or whether it justifies civil war. The conversation was about Lincoln's legacy, and how good of a president he was. I've tried to stay as focused as I could around the topic of your original post.
Just trying to get you to see you don’t believe what you are saying. Unless you do believe abortion justifies civil war, at which point I will say you are being logically consistent and apologize.
More mind reading. Saying about what exactly? How do you know I don't believe what I say?
I completely reject the premise that the two beliefs that abortion justifies civil war, and Lincoln's actions had a greater benefit than cost, held simultaneously, would prove logical consistency or inconsistency. People have differing views of abortion, abortion is not slavery, and cost-benefit analyses of complex situations have multiple variables to be considered. My opinion about whether abortion justifies civil war is irrelevant.
Once again, this conversation was not about abortion and whether or not it justifies civil war. It was about Lincoln's legacy and how good he was as a president.
Please read this book to get a quick primer on mind reading and cost-benefit analysis:
https://www.amazon.com/Loserthink-Untrained-Brains-Ruining-America/dp/0593083520
Letting people be free is just too high of a cost. Got it.
Where did I say that? Show me. You can't call anyone out over something they never said.
Abortion is worse than slavery yet you don’t want to do anything about it
Show me where I said anything about abortion. Are you a mind reader or something?
I think you mean: "do the benefits of war outweigh the costs?"
It depends on the situation. In the civil war in particular, both sides had different reasons for fighting.
If your question is actually just a different way to phrase your last question, my answer remains the same: the benefits of Lincoln's actions did outweigh the costs.
Lincoln did what he had to do to save the country. He's known for freeing the slaves and saving the country.
Also, just because the left celebrates him doesn't make him bad. What the fuck. History is rarely that simple.
I wish this was more concise.
Who exactly took over the domain in question, and was it before, or after the SolarWinds hack?
In any case, it looks like more American companies are helping foreign entities attack our country.
One of the things I praise Trump for the most is his forward thinking on space.
I usually get a sarcastic "yeah, very forward thinking" remark, but here's the thing:
- Russia and China are racing us to the moon for political, economic, and military reasons. The Space Force is long overdue.
- For the reasons mentioned, it's crucial we get to the moon (and beyond) first.
- The amount of unbelievable, sci-fi type technology we already have will absolutely fucking drop your jaw. This isn't secret information; it's just not widely publicized or commercially available. Think growing organs, invisibility shields, etc. These things will play a role in our future in peace and conflict. Better to be as prepared as possible.
Always have . . .