1
LibertyPrimeWasRight 1 point ago +1 / -0

This would be a good time to remind them that the Super Straight flag is black and orange.

1
LibertyPrimeWasRight 1 point ago +1 / -0

True. They vote for the left because they aren't shown the extremism they're actually voting for, and they aren't shown any of the good arguments or complete representations of what they're voting against.

5
LibertyPrimeWasRight 5 points ago +5 / -0

I’ve even seen it work on above average people, because the globalists have done a very nice, devious job of creating a full spectrum of fakery. So, they take the time to listen to CNN, The Economist, NPR, The Wall Street Journal, The Atlantic, etc. and they think they’re getting a good spectrum of left, right, center… but they aren’t, because an entire fake “right” has been constructed.

1
LibertyPrimeWasRight 1 point ago +1 / -0

To some degree, yes. But I also think that the internet pushed people—men and women—into allowing themselves to slide into/accept their degeneracy and the degeneration of society by making those who were revealed seem suddenly much more prevalent. Like how conservatives almost certainly outnumber leftists, but you'd think the opposite from looking at any remotely mainstream site.

1
LibertyPrimeWasRight 1 point ago +1 / -0

I assume you’re agreeing with me, because that’s my point too. That other asshole was specifically attacking him over “don’t want.”

4
LibertyPrimeWasRight 4 points ago +7 / -3

It’s not cowardice to not want to wage violent war against everyone you’ve ever known and loved. It’s psychopathic to wish for that.

1
LibertyPrimeWasRight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Technically, “Americans” is one type of group....

1
LibertyPrimeWasRight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Makes sense to me. If it was locked, after all, in what world could ~40 policemen not break down that door?

3
LibertyPrimeWasRight 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’m scared of trannies in the same way I’m scared of any mentally unstable person associated with a violent ideology/illness that is prone to outbursts when not indulged.

It’s not exactly irrational.

2
LibertyPrimeWasRight 2 points ago +2 / -0

And what will fill the vacuum? Because something always will.

3
LibertyPrimeWasRight 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have an old college friend that lives up that way. He tells me Portland (Maine) is pretty fucked, but he lives up north so it hasn’t touched him much yet.

I’ll stay in the south, personally.

4
LibertyPrimeWasRight 4 points ago +4 / -0

You’re right. A significant number of the crusades were against invading Muslims. My overall point still stands.

5
LibertyPrimeWasRight 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes, but that’s relativism and perspective. It doesn’t change the moral value of the act itself.

If the state is immoral, then sedition, unless performed in an equally immoral way, is a moral thing. If the state is moral, sedition is immoral.

There are plenty of untrue things printed in history books about how so and so cause was evil, perhaps more than things in history books that are true. Nowadays, the popular understanding is that the Crusades were evil, aggressive Christian assaults on people just because they were different. But that doesn’t change the reality that they were a necessary response to Muslim aggression against Europe.

21
LibertyPrimeWasRight 21 points ago +21 / -0

Just like treason, sedition is theoretically a negative, but is actually a positive if the state is illegitimate or immoral.

12
LibertyPrimeWasRight 12 points ago +12 / -0

I'm sure the dog would appreciate good meat or something, but if it's like almost every other dog I've ever known or heard of, he's also super excited for his kibble. Or whatever random semi-edible substance he can scrounge off the ground.

Animals probably like good tasting stuff in sort of the same way we do, but they aren't exactly picky.

2
LibertyPrimeWasRight 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe, but Kavanagh goes along with enough to keep up the political theater while still advancing their goals.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure they’d be happy to put in another lefty. But I don’t know that they care enough to arrange an assassination.

13
LibertyPrimeWasRight 13 points ago +13 / -0

More likely he wasn't someone they sent, just a psycho leftist true believer. Why would they need to kill Kavanaugh when he's on their side on all the really important stuff? Has the Supreme Court done anything really based or meaningful recently, after all?

7
LibertyPrimeWasRight 7 points ago +7 / -0

No, actually. We both independently named ourselves after the giant commie-killing robot from fallout.

I do try to avoid commenting in the same chains he does for this reason, though. If you wanna assume we’re the same person, I don’t really mind, although I don’t think you’ll find we’re in lockstep.

Edit: for the record, I’m not really trying to take a stance on what you said. I’m... undecided about that. I just think that the echo is literally redundant.

18
LibertyPrimeWasRight 18 points ago +20 / -2

If that’s white supremacy, it implies some very negative things about non-white people.

view more: Next ›