2
LibertyPrimeWasRight 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is actually one of the most racist nonviolent things I’ve heard recently. It’s not even subtle. How can they say things like this without the epiphany smacking them over the head?

11
LibertyPrimeWasRight 11 points ago +11 / -0

Okay, but is there a problem with the actual content, or are you just an edgelord?

1
LibertyPrimeWasRight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course he’s got a checkmark.

14
LibertyPrimeWasRight 14 points ago +14 / -0

It’s funny—they (rightfully) laugh at the history or cigarette company funded studies finding all kinds of “health benefits,” but if you suggest that something like the UN could also have conflicts of interest, you’re a “science denier.”

2
LibertyPrimeWasRight 2 points ago +5 / -3

My main problems with the “Jews” theories are:

  • Why is Israel seemingly falling for the vaccine scam, and why does so much of their government seem to love Trump?

  • Of all the plans one could come up with for seizing global power, why would theirs include, as a major component, “weaken the western nations that bow over backward to support us by replacing their population with members of a religion devoted to our extermination”?

I’m not saying I dismiss the entire possibility out of hand—I try hard not to do that for any theory—but what’s the usual explanation for why a hypothetical Jewish conspiracy would include such seemingly self-destructive to the point of retarded elements?

8
LibertyPrimeWasRight 8 points ago +8 / -0

Anything that claims a moral authority greater than the state, or a higher purpose to life than existing, is a threat to any dictatorship. Those two things are both powerful motivators in opposition to an unjust authority, and so whether it is an organized religion or even just a compelling system of philosophy, it cannot be allowed to thrive.

1
LibertyPrimeWasRight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Uh... hmm... I’m not, but I can try to imagine what they’d say.

Maybe something like “Christians are super duper privileged already, they don’t need a doodle”?

1
LibertyPrimeWasRight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, but that’s assuming it’s all on Kobe. The points he can score in a game are not solely determined by him, but a function of his opponents and teammates as well.

If 81 was unusually low for him, you’d have a point, because in that case, it could in fact have been totally up to him to play “poorly” in order to accomplish that. But because 81 is unusually high, it would require the cooperation of both the opposing team and his own to allow him to score exactly that number in exactly that game.

Or some intervention by Satan on his behalf, I suppose.

I’m not saying it’s impossible, because I know better than to claim it with that certainty—you could indeed be correct—I’m just saying that it’s not as simple as Kobe deciding “yeah, I’m gonna score 81 points in my 666th game.” That’s not something he could in any way guarantee on his own.

Edit: my bad, thought you were the first guy for some reason. Pretty sure you’re actually agreeing with me.

I think I need some sleep.

2
LibertyPrimeWasRight 2 points ago +2 / -0

Actually, I think that one might be a soy-filled man.

7
LibertyPrimeWasRight 7 points ago +7 / -0

Given all the things Obama's DOJ has done, and the way that he weaponized the entire federal government to protect its own corruption in a way that ultimately resulted in a blatantly stolen election and "Vaccine Passports" (among many other things), can you really say he didn't?

2
LibertyPrimeWasRight 2 points ago +2 / -0

Funny to think that that’s a major controversy—these days, the media publishing something they “failed to authenticate” (to put it kindly) is just another news cycle.

Makes you wonder just how much they got away with in the past, doesn’t it?

4
LibertyPrimeWasRight 4 points ago +4 / -0

Within six hours of game.

I hope the Mets are enjoying playing to an empty stadium, because I can’t imagine anyone jumping through that hoop. Even the people who are so COVID-crazy that they think it’s sensible will decide it’s just too much hassle.

5
LibertyPrimeWasRight 5 points ago +5 / -0

It doesn’t take nine minutes to die of oxygen deprivation. If the knee is what killed him, why’d it take so long?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›