what are you gonna do about it now?
dont blame me, I think I got it from Stefan molyneux, but it stands to reason. NAZI is to ethnosocialism and USSR CCP is to global socialism. They're just two sides of the same coin.
I tried to make it fit when he said they're both actually leftist parties. The bit about pre-revolutionary vs post-revolutionary is all me tho.
there is a difference between two 16 year olds or a 17 year old and an 18 year old versus a 16 year old and a 32 year old, but none should be encouraged.
Not in any material sense. A dick is a still a dick.
Once again, normal children don't murder because it isn't normal.
Not in today's world. But it was. Do you not watch the nature channel for bonobos and apes?
Sexual activity for a child is part of normal human development. So you say "sex is normal and healthy". Then whence does it become "bad and damaging" because its someone over 18 doing it with them?
You're still arguing in favor of normalizing sexual activity for children. If its healthy, then it is largely irrelevant the age.
You cannot take this in circles by falling back on the "well adults should control themselves and know better, children can't control themselves (wrong, because thats why they dont commit theft and murder) and don't know better (also wrong because they can be taught that other things are wrong), so its okay".
You cannot use this argument precisely because if you say "sex for children isn't harmful" then there is NO NEED to argue "they dont know better so we shouldnt punish them".
To suggest "well they dont know better" is to suggest that it is, in fact, harmful, and if you don't want to prevent that harm, you are part of the problem.
You have a giant anus gaping hole in your reasoning and I hope you understand that now.
Yes because its cultural appropriation according to the wokerati
We arrest children for theft, murder, and forcible rape. It isn't hard.
Age of consent should be 18. Cuties is what happens in societies that keep pushing the envelope of "let children diddle each other".
Let me ask you, if the football team coerced your daughter to take a train of dicks in her, would you be "grateful" that the law could provide no recourse for you because "well, they're all of similar age so no law is being broken, oh well"?
Here's a few more ways we prosecute children.
If its a 15 year old encouraging sexual acts from a 10 year old. 15 year old meets prison.
Even though its not "technically wrong" in your book, because "they're both just kids and can't control themselves"...
You want to tell me that you wouldnt want the 15 year old jailed?
What you're doing is asking for a "restorative justice gap", where, as long as the abuser is close enough in age, its totally okay and will not be acted on.
That's retarded.
or everyone can start sending profanity to their inbox.
16 year olds stripping for men is legal in Rhode Island
Let me guess. A whore offered to change money for sucking his dick. The new laws protecting whores from prosecution means she's viewed as a victim and he's considered a master criminal.
When will women be held responsible for their part? This is just more "women have no agency" behavior.
He aint wrong though.
The truth is that flourescent and LED light pollution is far worse than incand.
What's worse. A light source that slowly gets dimmer and brighter over a span of microseconds, or a light that completely turns on and off over a span of microseconds? I know what the data and studies say.
Energy savings now, costing animals and people their sanity in the future.
is it any wonder when people have to be glued to computers 24/7 at home (or their phones) that people are going insane? People think it be the twitter machine, but its actually the mental derangement from chronic blue light sources that flash at high frequencies.
Just look up your own sources on whether screen time, flourescent lights ,and others have negative impacts on brain capabilities.
Because Nazis are Ethnonationalist Socialists and Communists are Globalist Socialists.
Do you really think the commies are going to stand by and let you keep your chaotic empire right next to their precious Order? No.
Pre-revolutionary communism wants to spread because it views all people as oppressed and needing to be freed, even ni other countries. Post-revolutionary communism wants to spread because it views all people as threats to the communist regime if they are their own sovereign entities.
yeah "suicide".
Anyone know where hillary was last night?
im glad you dont vote. Napolitano would tell you that "the citizen should have the same technological equality as the government if the 2A was truly followed"
one wont. thousands will.
I was watching joe rogan talk to this guy
https://youtu.be/pXRnNyUnq1A?list=WL&t=118
He said he had really big balls to fight when he had air support to finish the fight for him.
When it went away he shit his pants (my interpretation).
he went from balls-out to shrunken-sack and 100 yard staring depresso-monotone when his unit got crushed because of no air support.
Lesson here: Air support is actually god damn important in the war theatre.
You can own the tank without BATF.
its the cannon that makes it a problem.
Everyone should own a tank with a quick install for a cannon.
But you're the converted.
Well, if you see racism everwhere, you might be the racist one.
if you see sexualized kids everywhere, you might be the one sexualizing them.
:^)
nice desert eagle.
https://youtu.be/exhcazyOR9c?t=268
I found a link to you within the very video.
you said rageoholic and I thought you meant late 2020 tim pool.