1
LirukDatan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Less going to rallies or protests.

Sit at home, watch CNN.

1
LirukDatan 1 point ago +1 / -0

At this point, provided election fraud will be addressed, Biden will be basically running the Trump reelection campaign.

1
LirukDatan 1 point ago +1 / -0

It doesn't matter if conservatives do this because the media is on their side, and will keep things quiet just like Hunter's laptop. During the past four years the charade was for show anyway for external consumption (as in delegitimizing GEOTUS for international audiences).

What all pedes should do is turn the Biden administration into an international embarrassment. Sign a petition that the US government is illegitimate. Make them deal with that when it comes to international relations.

How can you show up your face when the American people publically disowned you. I mean Biden won't mind cause he won't remember, but every other member of the illegitimate government would have difficulties.

1
LirukDatan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah vote them out! Out! Out! Write in "Eat a bag of dicks you dirty commie bastards!" if necessary.

But in order to circumvent the "who count the votes" thing, we need to make a parallel count.

When the people in Belarus went to vote the resident dictator out in last year's elections, they knew that you can't trust the official vote counts, and observers from the opponent's support were not allowed in. So whoever voted for his opponent all wore a white ribbon, and the votes were tallied outside the polls. Not that it mattered much, but that's how the public knew that the election was stolen. The government couldn't hide it.

9
LirukDatan 9 points ago +9 / -0

I too think it's going to work like in John Carpenter's "They Live". You can register as whatever, but only the pre approved people will be chosen for such critical tasks like counting the votes.

2
LirukDatan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump team has a Dominion machine in their possession. If Dominion tampers with the code and it doesn't match to what is presented as evidence I think they would be even more screwed.

Problem is, whether it's going to be a fair judge/court...

1
LirukDatan 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is, but it's a fire that doesn't spread into the ivory towers that can print the "correct" amount of votes. The media is all too well equipped for reporting as if there is no fire at all (reminds me of Baghdad Bob), while big tech is torpedoing conservative platforms. This will slow the fire from spreading, and any time the democrats gain will allow them to dig their cancerous roots deeper, and subvert the freedoms of US citizens in order to prevent an insurrection.

I can only hope that I'm wrong, and this is just a negative projection that will never happen.

1
LirukDatan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well if they no longer need to care about the actual voters, what difference does it make? They can still use the media to make it appear as if they have the support of various minorities.

0
LirukDatan 0 points ago +1 / -1

That only happened because the dems weren't prepared to commit fraud on such a blatant level. Seeing that they can do whatever they want regardless of evidence, there is no way a candidate not approved by the swamp will be elected. If the fraud is not rooted out, all we're gonna get is an illusion of democracy.

1
LirukDatan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you understand that if the fraud isn't removed, your vote won't matter? Once the RINOS rely or take part in the uniparty system of the rigged elections they'll get as many votes as necessary to maintain appearances that there are fair elections, and your vote won't even be part of the system. Might as well throw the ballot into a shredder. That's why they can piss on you and call it rain. It doesn't matter whether you vote or not, or who you'll vote for. It's not your vote they have to cater to. They won't have to cater to anyone's vote anymore.

2
LirukDatan 2 points ago +2 / -0

I understand the feeling of frustration. It often seems as if all we're getting is platitudes and calls for hope that in a few days the big thing will happen. Next week. And as time passes on there are less and less avenues available to redeem the fraudulent election.

Still, I think that all non violent options must be exhausted first. Do note that president Trump does not appear panicked, or lashing out. The lying media tries to portray him as such, but he doesn't appear so. People at the top that matter, like VP Pence, Pompeo, and others are confident. They have more up their sleeves than they're showing now. Is this a facade, or not? I don't know. Also note that they are fully aware of the amount of support GEOTUS has, and that one word from him will bring people in droves to his call to arms. This hasn't happened yet, though.

They also know full well what would happen if the democrats get to pulling the reigns again. I don't think they have any intention of letting this happen. You may say that it may not be up to them anymore, but I doubt that the people in the most powerful positions in the world that knew full well that the fraud was coming, failed to prepare ahead of time.

2
LirukDatan 2 points ago +2 / -0

I actually think that in Trump's 2nd term we will see intensive investigations into fraud in every state. They already collected the data. They're just using the bits relevant to the situation at the moment.

2
LirukDatan 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's not just that, though. How many people are out there that actually know the limitation of a mask, wear it properly, change masks frequently, keep their hands out of their faces? The masks can work, but they are a slapstick solution that demands too much of the mask. Much more than its intended use. In the hands of the general public they are meant to be an illusion of safety, while in reality they're not meant to keep you safe. They're just meant to keep the dirty peasants from infecting the elites. Those walk around without masks, only put those for the cameras when talking from a podium when the mask is unnecessary, go get their hair done on lockdown, etc.

1
LirukDatan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Masks won't be effective once your respiration makes the inner side of the mask wet. If you do any kind of sports, or if you're in a hot area where your face sweats and the sweat can't evaporate so the mask gets wet, or if you're in a cold area where your breath condenses on the inner side of the mask and getting it wet.

The mask is intended to stop viral particles in droplets of liquid in the air. Once the mask gets wet, the particles diffuse through the mask, and you end up breathing them.

Even though masks can be useful under certain conditions, to a degree, for a time, when worn properly, they won't offer any protection in a gym, or under any conditions when they end up getting wet.

1
LirukDatan 1 point ago +1 / -0

This sounds more like incompetence and lack of knowledge mixed in various interested parties trying to capitalize on a good crisis.

When there was footage in China of people dropping/ losing consciousness, it looked fake, because from what I've seen the people would fall forward and at the last moment putting up hands so they wouldn't face plant into the ground. Now, if a person loses consciousness, they usually fall sideway as one of the knees buckles. Folks usually don't just fall forward.

The testing needed to be cheap enough, quick enough, and available enough so every lab could do it. If you have one or two labs in the world that can give you the answer with 100% precision, that won't do you any good because they'll be backlogged for the next 1000 years. Obviously the testing methodology had to come with certain compromises. Here is where incompetence is coming in. The tests (at least the PCR ones) are meant to detect viral RNA. They also detect RNA from other viruses from the same coronavirus family.

This means that this test should be used as a first step to filter out the bulk of the suspected sick people. Then another test should be performed to verify that this is in fact the right type of coronavirus (usually done with the antibody test). If someone is an idiot and is relying on just one test, or someone is trying to save money by just doing one type of test, you gonna have a ton of false positives and confusion in general.

Also, regarding the tests, they are intended to receive the appropriate input. If you use something else like coca cola (and some African president who happened to have a degree in chemistry used all sorts of samples for testing) that can give you a positive result, means that the test was not carried out properly. The test is intended with a specific input in mind.

8
LirukDatan 8 points ago +8 / -0

Gases are several orders of magnitude smaller than proteins, that are smaller than viral particles, that are smaller than bacteria, that are smaller than liquid droplets. The masks are intended to stop* liquid droplets that may contain viral particles or bacteria. Not gases.

  • At least the majority of the liquid droplets. For a time. Under certain conditions. When worn properly.
6
LirukDatan 6 points ago +6 / -0

Meanings of the words change with time, and now it only appears in context where the majority decides something against the globalist "vision". When the majority decided poorly, like to do a BREXIT for example. So they are getting criticized and shamed and there were attempts to redo the vote until the dirty peasants voted correctly.

The same thing with Tyranny of the minority. Now it's a criticism that comes up when trying to argue that the electoral college is bad.

Shit's either a democracy or a tyranny. People should be allowed to choose. If they choose poorly, they live with the shitty decisions they've made. I think that the idea of a democracy, or the freedom of choice should not be limited by some authority that would vet my choices. I pay for my mistakes, but I also want the liberty to make them.

-1
LirukDatan -1 points ago +4 / -5 (edited)

From the same toolbox of bullshit terms like "Tyranny of the majority", and "Tyranny of the minority".

Edit: After a short discussion it is agreed upon that the terms are legitimate concepts, but these days are used without the proper context to push an agenda.

4
LirukDatan 4 points ago +4 / -0

So the US has 331 million people. Now if for some reason everyone went infertile all of a sudden, and started dying only from COVID, it would take:

331,000,000 / (60 min x 24 hours x 365 days) = 629.75 years until everyone's dead? Oh no!

1
LirukDatan 1 point ago +1 / -0

We all knew, but did we have the means to do anything about it (besides letting other people know, I mean)? Trump had the technological means to catch and expose the dems. I'm pretty sure their plans don't hinge on factors out of their control like the courts. I mean it'll get to the courts eventually, but I think that GEOTUS and his team aren't leaving anything to chance.

5
LirukDatan 5 points ago +5 / -0

Trump and his team knew about the fraud the dems systematically built into the system well ahead of the elections. Even 2012 tweets from Trump indicate that he knew already the dems had the game rigged.

He and his team did not sit idly by while preparing for the 2020 elections, so they've come prepared. I bet there's a great deal of things going on behind the scenes, and it sucks to not be "in the know", but I'm pretty sure they know what they're doing.

That's the best I can give ya.

1
LirukDatan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, if the courts dodge and don't take it seriously when the constitution, the sole most important document in the US is being violated, then why should anyone submit to their authority?

view more: Next ›