5
LirukDatan 5 points ago +5 / -0

With all the mail in voting BS (like the 20k fake driver licenses seized in Michigan), it is not guaranteed that Trump will win.

Unless everybody goes and vote for him, and brings everyone they know along to vote for him.

2
LirukDatan 2 points ago +2 / -0

So... an honest question. Are the dwellings of these rioters exempt from looting or arson? Great, you've stolen a 2500000 inch TV. No one's gonna steal it from you? And it ain't gonna be a white dude that will break into your place in a housing project in an all black neighborhood. It also won't be a white dude who'll shoot you over that TV...

8
LirukDatan 8 points ago +8 / -0

"users are afforded a greater degree of freedom in what they can post." -Oh no! The absolute horror! Freedom of speech? Not on our watch!

Also, more than 5.8 MILLION people on the site in July? YEAH BABY!!

Also #2: "Mr. Trump" -That's PRESIDENT Trump, you seditious commie fucking bastards!

Also #3: "Kristina Gildejeva, a disinformation researcher at Logically" And we are the Russian shills, huh?

Also #4: "calling for the implementation of a potentially restrictive type of voter identity system that many on the left argue is discriminatory" - That's an interesting way to say VOTER ID...

I see that the writer of this piece is in London, and can only wish him and his editor some cultural enrichment in the form of a truck of peace.

5
LirukDatan 5 points ago +5 / -0

Insanity! This is what USA needs - Not the best person for the job, but a black woman for VP.

People that employ such backwards logic shouldn't be allowed near any decision making positions within cannonball range!

2
LirukDatan 2 points ago +2 / -0

They never were.

insert reversed "always has been" meme

2
LirukDatan 2 points ago +2 / -0

As if any of the kids actually bother to listen to zoom classes... I bet they're all surfing the web and playing video games.

8
LirukDatan 8 points ago +8 / -0

Only if that's a rich aggressive man.

It goes like this basically:

If you have some unusual habits or interests:

If you're poor - you're a weirdo. Ewww...

If you're rich - you're not a weirdo, you're "eccentric"...

If you're aggressive:

Poor - Wife beater, sick rapist.

Rich - Strict, no nonsense protector.

Money makes a world of difference...

3
LirukDatan 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's entirely plausible that Hezbollah will make bunkers under strategically safe locations. Schools, hospitals, the only grain silo in the country... Places that Israel is never going to bomb when Hezbollah decides to stir up some shit.

9
LirukDatan 9 points ago +9 / -0

But he wasn't talking about groping every pussy within reach like Biden does with kids, did he. He was talking about how women let you do whatever you want to them as long as you're rich and they're gold diggers. Why can't the left learn to read entire sentences, instead of cherry picking words to suit their narrative?

2
LirukDatan 2 points ago +2 / -0

So is there a way to trace the ballots in this case? Half a million incorrect ballots... Are these all the ballots that were sent, or the portion that was found? How many of these ballots will be miraculously found after the elections to fraudulently affect the results?

If this shit is not going to be under control, the Dems will steal the election!

2
LirukDatan 2 points ago +2 / -0

I keep saying over and over - Democrats, or liberals in general appear to speak as if their arguments or the problems they are addressing exist in a vacuum. Right now this may be the best thing to say to appease people if you've just come here from outer space and have no idea what's happening. In the real world, events are tied by causality, and it's something they just fail to understand every single time. That's why every single thing they say contradicts something they've said previously, or will say tomorrow.

3
LirukDatan 3 points ago +3 / -0

So what happens if someone votes by mail, but something happens and the ballot is undeliverable. Can that person go vote in person? Could this be a way to selectively lose ballots of republican voters?

1
LirukDatan 1 point ago +1 / -0

I understand what you're saying, but that's the thing, you see, people are so divided that everyone is fortified in their camp. People will keep voting for their representative just to keep if from the other party. If Jim Jordan is all talk, he will still have many votes behind him, because if he isn't going to keep his seat, the seat will go to a democrat. This allows the politicians to be useless shits, and sit in government for 50 fucking years doing fuck all. Shedding light on how ineffective these politicians are can only have so much effect, although my gripe is just with how the media bit is being represented. This title is just meant to placate the masses and give an illusion that something has been achieved by this.

What really needs to happen is for politicians to have accountability. You didn't achieve what you were elected to achieve, you GTFO and become ineligible for election for life.

6
LirukDatan 6 points ago +6 / -0

Obliterates! Annihilates! Disintegrates!

What's the deal with such obnoxiously "loud" statements in the title? Nothing gets done anyway. Not like Jim Jordan is going to drop everything and go do something about Facebook censorship...

I like Tucker Carlson, and Jim Jordan has his moments too, it's just these titles that get to me. They give the impression that something was accomplished, while in reality nothing was.

5
LirukDatan 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think that's how the media bait and switches information. People will remember that someone couldn't tell a rhino from a hippo, and by replacing the who, folks that aren't paying attention will go about thinking it's Trump that has pudding for brains rather than Joe.

4
LirukDatan 4 points ago +4 / -0

Just spent several hours trying to look it up, but there's so much awful shit going down there that trying to find a specific event from several years ago is like looking for a needle in a haystack of other needles that are just as awful.

11
LirukDatan 11 points ago +13 / -2

It's the other way around in their thinking I suspect. To the left it is empowering, but it is a false sense of whatever you name it, as she can do it in a civilized country and no harm would come to her. If she had done it someplace else, middle east, east Europe, central America, she would've been torn apart.

Fun fact (or not so much): during the little green men invasion in Crimea by Russia, one of the so called pro-Russian "separatists" squad leaders was there with his girl. Guns and booze and lots of attention to her. A couple of days after he got himself killed, the remaining squadmates gangbanged her. I don't recall if it was to death or not, but it was reported that all cavities have been torn to shit.

6
LirukDatan 6 points ago +6 / -0

Considering that the '#' symbol is pronounced 'pound', I dare say #metoo hasn't in fact, changed at all.

2
LirukDatan 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's the thing, his credentials don't cover a global pandemic. I think it's more probable that he's in over his head.

Even if he did have an intention to get people killed, would he do that by taking the position he's in right now? He'll be the first one to blame, all the attention is on him.

2
LirukDatan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not directly though, but by proxy. Proxy who could be manipulated, pressured, and otherwise directed.

0
LirukDatan 0 points ago +1 / -1

Because ¿Dónde está la biblioteca?

But on a serious note, if he was both incompetent and malicious, his plan would've spectacularly backfired and he'd accidentally fuck it all up by somehow killing the virus.

1
LirukDatan 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think that a sociopath would ever admit to be incompetent.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›