Sign In or Create an Account
And as I said, there are zero sources, and zero confirmation. Never implied you were treating it as gospel, just wanted to provide context that it is right now, at best, hopium.
Connecticut info is wrong. In person is one party consent, telephone is all party consent.
In most cases, no one may record a telephone conversation without the knowledge of all parties to the conversation. Knowledge includes: (1) orally announcing, in a prerecorded message, to all parties to the conversation at the beginning that it is being recorded; (2) prior consent; or (3) supplying an automatic and distinct signal repeated every 15 seconds while recording equipment is used. Anyone who violates the law may be sued for damages, costs, and reasonable attorney's fees.
The following people can record telephone conversations without the knowledge of the parties to that conversation:
law enforcement and public safety personnel, including people working with law enforcement officers, engaged in the lawful performance of their duties;
anyone who receives threats of extortion, bodily harm, or other unlawful requests or demands;
anyone who receives calls repeatedly or at an extremely inconvenient hour; and
FCC-licensed radio personnel recording for rebroadcast or programming (CGS § 52-570d).
I think that’s from back when they did the flip flop about employers that mandate being held liable. I think new Biden regime thing about OHSA making it a workplace safety requirement in an effort to mandate it reopens the door to employer liability and workman’s comp claims.
Zero sources. Zero confirmation.
And that’s London, Ontario, Canada. That’s one Land Systems Division of General Dynamics. This broad scope “General Dynamics Corporation” info is bullshit. GD is divided up into multiple independent business units under a General Dynamics umberella
Is this about that “lawn boy” book?
Just like “found ballots” always benefit a democrat candidate.
Most of the Bill of Rights are not written in the manner of “citizens - you are allowed to do this”, they are written in language that says “citizens - the government is NOT allowed to do this to you”
That’s why they’ll never cure cancer. The money that can be made from a cure is nothing compared to the Billions of dollars that are donated every year to hundreds of research entities.
Why were there California school children in Afghanistan?
I’ve been wondering why there were so many non-military Americans in Afghanistan. I’m the middle of a “pandemic”. Not exactly a vacation hotspot.
Tyson raped a woman.
Only 1 in 3 rapes get reported.
I can derive that Tyson has raped 3 women.
At this rate we’ll get the 2020 election cleared up just in time for 2024
Liberals: HEALTHCARE IS A BASIC HUMAN RIGHT!!!
Also Liberals: fuck you Trump supporter, we’re not testing you
The endgame is what Trudeau slipped and said the quiet part out loud. “Apply what we’ve learned to climate crisis, housing crisis…..”. Essentially if we instill enough fear into you, we can control and rule you
I’m surprised they kept him around this long. My guess is the Obama/Clinton puppet master shadow government will keep him propped up for as long as possible because Kamala isn’t as controllable.
I agree with you, I never said they should be able to. Doesn’t change the fact that people saying HIPAA is a law that protects your privacy is going to get a lot of people fucked if they don’t understand it and try to use it as a defense
A) it’s HIPAA
B) this is not how HIPAA works. HIPAA prevents someone who has access to your medical information (your doctor, your hospital) from sharing it without your permission. Ever need your PCP to give you a referral to a specialist? You sign a HIPAA waiver which allows them to discuss your medical information with the specialist. HIPAA is not some catch-all “my medical information is private” law
“Not allowed” hahahhahahaha
Ranked choice voting. It allows people to have their “protest vote” for an independent candidate, then have their vote count for the democrat. Maine will never have a Republican governor again
The preference is you should always use two, but if you use one, it’s used on your strong side to help provide balance and prevent you from leaning to your weak side and putting pressure on your injury. You move it in sync with your injured leg. It doesn’t “replace” the leg. Walking is strong leg, weak leg/crutch, strong leg, weak leg/crutch.
When you search “how to use a single crutch” every site says “do not use on the same side as your bad leg”
The preference is you should always use two, but if you use one, it’s used on your strong side to help provide balance and prevent you from leaning to your weak side and putting pressure on your injury. You move it in sync with your injured leg. It doesn’t “replace” the leg. Walking is strong leg, weak leg/crutch, strong leg, weak leg crutch.
I have used crutches multiple times in my life.
Apparently not sophisticated enough
This is why Bill Gates has been buying up huge amounts of farmland.
To be fair though, all he can do is drag his feet