1
Loiuzein 1 point ago +1 / -0

The covax is supposed to be free I thought

12
Loiuzein 12 points ago +12 / -0

I can't believe there are NO PEDES IN GEORGIA. How has no one overcome a flimsy metal fence?!

1
Loiuzein 1 point ago +1 / -0

NOW THAT THEY'VE HAD TIME TO CLEAN OUT THE BAD ONES.

3
Loiuzein 3 points ago +4 / -1

Our major problem is that, in this country, violence hasn't been the answer for a long time. Because we built something damn good.

2
Loiuzein 2 points ago +2 / -0

Antifa are a worthless target unfortunately. Easily replaced. A bit like roaches. They'll scatter at the first sign of anything spooky but they come back with no reduction of numbers as soon as the scary man is gone.

1
Loiuzein 1 point ago +1 / -0

"I mostly peacefully threaten to mostly be peaceful, but I'll mostly be even more peaceful than the mostly peaceful protests you're so scared of" ?

1
Loiuzein 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is there no way for one million people to overcome a cordon?

1
Loiuzein 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. DC doesn't allow any armaments, so there is obviously nothing like that. It would be silly to suggest such a thing!

1
Loiuzein 1 point ago +1 / -0

"You first" is a losing proposition. A person who says "you first" will not follow.

1
Loiuzein 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am at my wit's end and I will not stand silent while my country falls. Direct me to a better place to organize. If we show up in numbers less than the millions then they will not listen. This is proven by them having not listened when we have shown up.

Fine. Come unarmed. Allow yourself to be turned away. Watch the USA fall and say "At least we followed all the illegal rules."

5
Loiuzein 5 points ago +5 / -0

The jury box has until the 6th. On the sixth, there will be millions of us armed in DC waiting for them to tell us to open the ammo box.

291
Loiuzein 291 points ago +297 / -6

Please be in DC , armed, on the sixth. Yes, it's illegal to be armed in DC. Fuck that. There are millions of us and we own this country. We own the people making decisions for us in DC, and they will either side with "Law and Order" or "Might makes Right"

Notice: This is of course completely satire. No one believes in making a stink. We are all very good and obedient here and we have no ill will towards our masters.

3
Loiuzein 3 points ago +3 / -0

Heavily monitored from 100 feet away?

Heavily monitored by allowing software changes and data wiping days after the fact?

7
Loiuzein 7 points ago +7 / -0

Storm capital on the fifth. Remain. It belongs to us.

2
Loiuzein 2 points ago +2 / -0

With what threat of force do they hope to accomplish this ridiculous outcome?

3
Loiuzein 3 points ago +3 / -0

My suggestion would be to show up armed by the millions in dc on Jan sixth. Ignore their illegal restrictions on our second amendment.

That's the day the ruling class decides whether it wants to commit suicide. And if the reminder that they are indeed committing suicide isn't strong enough then, then it's their own free decision.

2
Loiuzein 2 points ago +2 / -0

Perhaps I misunderstood the arrangement? I agree with all that you said there. My understanding was that Texas was suing with the intent to receive restitution in the form of "the supposed results of this election shall be reviewed and changed if necessary" (possibly "in addition to" other restitution). In the specific case of the results of the election, the court could not take that case because the results of the election were not decided, and therefore damage was not done due to the results.

I know their major focus was on the breach of contract (which was a good and true focus). My thought as I was reading up on the result was that, essentially, they asked for too much at once / their requested restitution was not merited or could not be granted at the time.

I'll make a note to review it all again with your statements in mind, especially since Texas's secession stuff, in light of the expertise of the involved lawfolk, does support the idea that the ruling was malicious.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›