I thought so too. But theyre unironically right about it.

Q is most likely a cia psyop to poison the well. They get some exact dates of events right just to have credibility but it's always "something big is coming" with them.

Were they certified by the state's legislature though?

So what's the chances they overturn them?

Not to be a doomer but why was this guy silent about the whole fraud mess

Does the constitution explicitly explain this procedure

I get conflicting explanations

Alex jones rightfully calls q bullshit. This made alex way more credible to me

im honestly 99% sure this is lost

but there is talk that texas will refile once the electors have cast their votes to have standing/injury. i don't think this will be the case but we will see on monday

i just come here for legal updates tbh

3D

4R

As I understood they don't have to like the Colorado weed case liberals have been spamming.

I'll naively give scotus one last try with the PA case waiting for cert. If they by some sorcery give us that win, I think Lin Wood's similar constitutional case is fast tracked to a decision (also pending cert) and that could put on enough pressure for MI and WI's legislature to act. It's a long shot but that's what would happen if the switch was flipped from this point

It doesn't make sense,.what's even the point of hearing the case?

what if scotus says you can resolve this in each state court?

like what kelly did in pa

the chance to go to the one and only non-military option available to them in the Constitution to resolve a state-to-state dispute.

this is what i'm wondering? why can't they? technically they can take these violations in each sate, just that texas as a state can't sue

defendant states all clearly violating the constitution:

"uhhhh good luck guys"

-new york

not necessary, if they didn't want to hear this case how it was first presented then they don't wan't to interfere with the election period. the case is that well written

yeah this is basically what is in question. future elections are just a side product of this mess

they pass this up now then why even have the united states

AG seems to be the least cucked high position

calling works. give energy to kentucky now

I hope their vote is public

That's what I think too, but the texas lawsuit is basically arguing the same points Kelly is making with similar remedies right? I thought it would make more sense to just hear Texas before Kelly

Last question, anything to expect from scotus today?

I'd imagine they're not going to hear Kelly's case in PA since this Texas suit supercedes it

Also, will it be a problem that the AG filed this not the SG? Some shill on 4chan pointed this out

Now that the real kraken is released I can say this without the fear of being deported (lost acc during logout)

I'd really want to know what's up with sydney. She was a very sound and revered lawyer and only recently went down the qanon rabbit hole. Many such cases but the thing is, why did she :

1. file at the federal court, despite being advised otherwise

2. appeal to a higher court, despite being given a miracle with how the judge granted her a temporary restraining order on the machines to be inspected and a hearing. What more could you ask for

It's like she's either a grifter or deliberately sabotaging trump's chances spreading wild disinfo. That doesn't seem like her character at all though

Lin Wood however just showed his true colors when he misled Mike Lyndell's bail money for Kyle. He took 700k from him and dropped out the case. What the fuck

I'm glad that's behind us with this Texas moab though. We ought to find out what happened here in any case after this election

do you have the tweet/pic of it?

We can have coomer testifying to absolutely everything and the left will say he was coerced

We should just give up on what they think because clearly they don't think.