Eh, this isn't the important part. The ruling from the DC Court of Appeals takes effect in 2 weeks.
Before that, any ONE judge can ask the panel to vote. If a "majority" decide to rehear this en banc, it goes out to September for a new hearing. Oh, Sullivan could appeal too, plausibly, but he's already got one race-baiter ally on the panel, so let's just assume he gets a vote.
Why did I put a simple word like "majority" in quotes? Because that bit of law is stupidly complex for absurd reasons and I'm going to ignore it. If they vote that way, you'll hear it.
If it goes en banc, expect them to rule against Flynn. There's no good reason to even bother with it unless they want to reverse the 3-judge panel's ruling. There is a non-trivial chance of this happening due to TDS, sadly.
After an adverse ruling, they'd submit a petition for a writ of certiorari and it'd go to the Supreme Court, if the Supreme Court so decided to accept it. Since ignoring it would allow a lower ruling against Flynn to stand, the logic here is the opposite--they likely wouldn't take it unless they wanted to exonerate Flynn. That said, there's a catch. You only need 4 of 9 votes to grant cert. That's not enough to exonerate Flynn.
So, expect this to drag itself out in a slow and torturous manner. It's how law works. There are more than a few cases that tediously drag on for decades. This doesn't have that much lifespan left, I think, but it's still torture.
When the cucks inevitably tell us that this image is "manipulated" the response should be "of course dumbass, if it was real, Biden would be sniffing a kid."
The sad thing is that I was willing to defend Sullivan until this farce, because he hadn't done anything obviously legally wrong at that point, as badly as I disagreed with it.
But this whole charade is over-the-top. I've gone from giving him the benefit of the doubt to the point where I want nothing less than him to be removed from the bench.
This isn't law at this point, it's pure politics. The law is as clear as it ever gets--Flynn deserves to be freed. Period.
What he's doing is judicial misconduct and every moment he prolongs this is a reason to impeach him.
The full panel has enough liberal judges that it's a fight. I've seen liberal lawyers who I thought would actually follow the law instead of politics go completely off the deep end on this one, violating long-held, publicly proclaimed principles (I'm looking at you Ken White of Popehat) so I don't have much faith in an apolitical ruling here.
If they scrape up the votes for a majority--and "majority" in this case is stupidly complicated for reasons I'm not even going to try to explain--this goes to them, then we petition the Supreme Court to see if they'll reverse this.
It almost certainly WILL get a vote to be heard en banc. That takes ONE lousy person to vote on it and they've already got that if the race baiting is anything.
It's what it was called when Flynn's lawyer asked the higher court to bitchslap Sullivan and order him to follow the law.
But the rest of the replies are also correct.
Amen.
Is this a bad time to mention that #resist has plans to appeal this en banc? Because yeah, I'm pretty sure they're going to do it again.
Sullivan isn't known for following directions from higher courts. I mean, he picked as his amicus someone who has already been slapped down for this exact sort of scheme...
This also might not yet be over, though it's a good start.
Sullivan can ask the panel to hear this en banc. If that reverses this decision, we go to the Supreme Court. Yes, it's that absurd. I wish they'd given a deadline for dismissing the case, but I'm not sure if that'd help.
There's a reason that the idiot on this panel threw out a bunch of race-baiting nonsense in their argument. Part of it is to bait the rest of them to hear this en banc or get tarred as "racists" on a bogus standard. The other part of it is this:
https://thedonald.win/p/FzPMyRVe/you-will-get-targeted-precisely-/
Hopefully they track down the phone that made the false report. Personally, I'd charge them with attempted murder.
Isn't Twitter also foreign-owned to a significant degree? Pretty sure there's some dopey prince with a large stake in it...
STOP SHOUTING FELLOW HUMAN.
I kid, but I seriously wonder if someone didn't start that sub and some others just to help their bots farm karma... Or maybe they use private subs for that, I dunno.
Yeah, I honestly feel like someone should at least test this with a civil suit.
Is it public who paid which bail?
Problem is we already know there are two justice systems :(
This should be illegal, or at least bail should be suspended during riots & for rioters. It makes no sense to let them go right back on the street to set fire to things.
You may be right about that, but with everything we know about Epstein blackmailing people as pedos, it looks more and more like certain state actors are conspiring to use such things to control the leaders of the Church.
Yup. I saw some CVS offices once. Every H1B was either 50k or 55k. Really low for here.
The same legal reasoning is going to get used in other contexts, though, that's the problem. Sure, this law doesn't apply, but why doesn't the logic behind how they came to that conclusion not apply?
We got any Brazilipedes or Bolsominions in Rio watching over Christ the Redeemer?
Ahh yes, they've tried to normalize "VIRPED" the so-called "virtuous" pedophiles who don't wish to offend. Suffice it to say, I don't think that normalizing pedos is a good idea.
See also:
They'll just decide they're unconstitutional, because the Supreme Court claimed that ability for themselves in Marburry v. Madison long ago and nobody has ever taken it back since.
Find the posted positions and salary's "range" of jobs given to h1-b candidates as mandated by the program.
Compare job title to salary band. Usually there's some correspondence like Developer > Sr. Developer > Principal Developer or what have you with I, II and III after it and each role corresponds to some range in the salary band. You can get quite a bit of info on the salaries these correspond to from H1-B applications, which may be posted by a break room or outside of HR.
Granted, this is not always the case, especially at smaller companies where they might use title inflation to retain people rather than salary, but bigger orgs seem to use this.
Yes, this also means you can tell who is getting raises by watching for changes of job title, which are not usually kept secret.
It was a sad day in my childhood when both Calvin & Hobbes and the Far Side both quit in relatively close proximity to each other. I had most of both of their books.
Wonder what the proper moniker should be? Crazy whores?
Also, wasn't Cortez one of those colonizers I keep hearing about? She should change her name to something more progressive...
That... actually explains a lot if they have a Calvinball theory of progress where whatever rules they just made up are the new normal.
I pretty much left when .WIN opened, not much point in visiting that empty shell on a cuck's site.
Did you know? They went and edited that part out later -
https://thedonald.win/p/FzPHHdA3/reddit-edits-excuse-for-quaranti/c/
As for why they're using flimsy excuses like that, I found a good explanation for what's going on and I posted it here:
https://thedonald.win/p/FzPMyRVe/you-will-get-targeted-precisely-/
The short answer is that this sort of nonsense is being used to hurt our will to fight back, it's not meant to be convincing, it's meant to make us doubt ourselves.