Sign In or Create an Account
I'm not sure your number is right. Using the Oxford calculator I had a 1 in 47000 chance of dying to covid and I'm neither at peak physical fitness or in my 20s anymore. Your point still stands though!
Woah, are you trying to kill people with horse dewormer? No, you need to wait for Pfizermectin.
There was never any disagreement that the recount matched the count, but an audit isn't for recounting the recount, it's to make sure everything is kosher.
It's like if you're a cashier and you count a deposit for the bank, and then have your manager recount and it matches. Then the bank calls you the next day and says they found a counterfeit 50 so your deposit is going to be 50 less.
The bank audited the deposit, and no amount of, "but the count matched the recount" is going to make the bank give you credit for the counterfeit bill.
I just want to point out that the deaths were classified as "mild" so you shouldn't worry about them.
Liberals : there's a deadly pandemic sweeping the globe so I'm going on vacation.
Also liberals : there's no way it could be my fault I got sick.
Except in San Francisco.
Yeah, the "sufficient data" used to justify the booster for the over 65 group was a 300 odd person study with only 12 people over 65 in it. You could probably find a larger study about the effect of healing crystals on covid in that age group.
This wasn't a quote from Kirsch, it was the presenter before him, Joseph Fraiman.
The advisory board didn't say this. A doctor in the open comment period did.
They act like we have this scheme of forcing them to go out and have fun and lying in wait for them without masks in an effort to kill them.
Must be that "short, mysterious illness" that people were catching and dying from...
"2000 unvaxxed pilots catch covid, shuts down air travel in the US. This is why we need mandates."
I believe the term they use is "mild" for any life threatening side effects that are inconvenient.
They're pushing the booster using a study of 300 people. 300.
Watch the livestream, they read the results out for the record.
It's probably a mental health expert in the Biden regime.
Disappointed this isn't set to the Doom song or the Dragonborn.
Whelp, wasn't expecting that reference to be made here but I'll allow it.
This dudes target acquisition in a chaotic environment is insane...
Wait... Have we ever seen this dude and Kyle in the same place at the same time?
This wasn't leaked by the FDA, it was part of the open comment period before their vote on approving a third booster shot. You can find the full hearing on youtube (as of last night at least) and there were several more based presenters right around the 4:10 mark.
Based Kim Witczak at 4:30ish.
Are we vaccinating everyone just to cover up adverse affects?
*edit: Also, Pfizer's whole study to prove efficacy of a third dose is like 300 people? Ivermectin and HQC studies teen times those sizes are dismissed as not large enough.
I love how illogical all this is. The original shot doesn't work as well for delta, so to combat this, we're going to mandate that everyone gets the original shot and boosters of the original shot, without any talk of making a delta specific shot.
I thought the benefit of mrna vaccines is that they can be created quickly for situations like this but we're not even trying? Weird.
Nope, the midwife coordinated all that just like the hospital would.
We did a home birth for our most recent and it was amazing. Look into it.
Assuming important people are being injected with the same thing, they won't die of the vaccine. They'll die of a "short illness", a "rare form of blood clots", or "an unexpected heart attack" sort of like the dozens of articles we've read where the vaccine isn't even mentioned.