2
LuvHarambe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe they have, but I think the comment still applies. We immediately shout from the rooftops about this stuff, when it should be expected as an everyday occurrence of everyone. This is why we’ve had Lyndsey Graham 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, etc. How many versions are we going to have to have before people realize all he does is try to get 15 seconds on camera? That’s just one example that hopefully everyone can relate to.

Not saying we shouldn’t support asking tough questions, but that alone is not a reason to “remember” someone. So perhaps said another way, the messaging of our community should be much stronger and more focused on tangible action as what we support. We’ve had too much tick tock, hammer drop, etc bullshit.

3
LuvHarambe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Isn’t it pathetic? Schwab (leader of WEF) wrote a fucking book about it that you can buy, that details all the crazy shit they want to do.

2
LuvHarambe 2 points ago +3 / -1

We need to set the bar much higher than asking questions we like at a hearing. By this metric, Even Lindsey Graham can pretend to be a good guy. If we immediately suck someone’s dick because they asked questions, thats what they’ll learn to do and they’ll never do anything else (see basically anyone in congress right now). These hearings never go anywhere, so why should I care that some guy asked some good questions. If nobody is actually doing anything about the problem, get them out. The bar for our support should be related to tangible action. Ex: the introduce legislation that we support and try to get votes for it. If it fails it fails, but that should be the lowest bar we set for supporting someone.

1
LuvHarambe 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is no Lindsey Graham 2.0, 3.0, etc. there’s just Lindsey Graham. He’s always been a sellout traitor in it for himself, and the sooner everyone learns that and gets this rat-fuck out of office the better off we all will be. He’s been on the wrong side for so long, he shouldn’t get any second chances (probably 10th chance by now). He’s done. I don’t care what he said in some hearing nobody fucking watched. Talk is cheap. Make room for someone who’s actually going to do something.

How many times do we have to get fooled by these pointless hearings that go nowhere, reports that underwhelm, and investigations that get shelved when there is clear evidence of wrong doing and/or criminal activity? Your average TDwin user could accomplish a hell of a lot more than these clowns. No more tick tock bullshit, no more hearings, no more reports. You send some fucking corrupt people to jail and declassify documents, or we find someone who will.

1
LuvHarambe 1 point ago +1 / -0

“White supremacist hipsters”

I am 1000% sure those subcultures don’t overlap.

2
LuvHarambe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Probably both are true. The way I think about it is, I never heard of this guy until that article, which means he probably wasn’t doing shit to help anybody or maga and was just in it for himself. Riding trumps coattails. People like Cruz, Gaetz, Nunes, etc you hear about because they fight.

1
LuvHarambe 1 point ago +1 / -0

I haven’t seen any information actually proving this. It’s always random Twitter/Facebook/Reddit posts claiming it.

Does anyone have something that actually proves Dick Cheney is advising him? I’d love to show that in the faces of my retarded family members, but I want it to be rock solid and not hearsay.

6
LuvHarambe 6 points ago +6 / -0

I’ve never even heard of this dude. So some creep comes out of a hole somewhere pretending to be a big shot. Trump is going to eat this guy’s lunch

4
LuvHarambe 4 points ago +4 / -0

Didn’t bother me. I figured he was just going through it on some regular show he does. I assume (perhaps wrongly?) that he has other press conferences that are a little more professional. This one felt like he was just giving his fans/audience a more informal briefing on where things are at and the path forward and I was okay with that.

2
LuvHarambe 2 points ago +2 / -0

I like to read comments before the videos, so this was helpful for me. Didn’t realize it wasn’t Trump’s case.

5
LuvHarambe 5 points ago +5 / -0

Lol, that’s fucking YUGE

3
LuvHarambe 3 points ago +3 / -0

The only answer is Trunaluminaprzure

3
LuvHarambe 3 points ago +3 / -0

We’ve got the best Doggos folks!

1
LuvHarambe 1 point ago +1 / -0

As an update, I did a 5-10 minute google search and didn’t see anything other than a reddit post on a Bernie sub claiming this. Sometimes I miss things, so if someone has it already or finds something more substantial please send my way...

11
LuvHarambe 11 points ago +11 / -0

Why should we? Nobody accepted Trump.

5
LuvHarambe 5 points ago +5 / -0

War mongers are always friends

1
LuvHarambe 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe in our President. He has come too far for it to just be over. I love seeing this man fight every day; it is inspiring. I want him to tear it all down and expose everyone, Democrat and/or Republican, that would do our country harm and sell us out to the highest bidder. I am still with him 100%.

1
LuvHarambe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wife had a mail in ballot, which the instructions said to use black or dark blue pen. I voted in person and my wife handed in her ballot. When I got to the table/booth, it had a felt tip marker (like a sharpie), and I returned it and said I can’t use it and need a black pen because I had read the instructions. Poll worker looked confused. Another guy in a separate booth returned a red pen. I was filling out my ballot at this time, but I heard him say the pen was red, and my wife said they had a pile of red pens when we left.

This was in a predominantly pro trump community near Tucson AZ. Does anyone know the number I should call to report?

1
LuvHarambe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Told my wife the same. Don’t think trump took the lead in 2016 until like 10pm pacific or something.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›