Yeah, something about this story stinks. It's going to be equivalent to the "arrest of a Florida man voting twice for Trump" or some BS.

Wow, this is more interesting than anyone may know. The fact this company does game development--which is a known way to pass along messages/info that generally aren't intercepted by intel agencies--is amazing. This is some PAKISI shit right here.

"Imran get in here. No staff."

NYT is still good as a way of asking, "who wants me to believe this, and why?"

1. Why are they praying before going off to vape? 2) Why is the mother the one handing off the pen?

This sounds about right until I get to Stacy Abrams. A lone actor couldn't print and ship 200k ballots. I think she was probably an expendable backup.

Man, Sterling really plans on going down with this ship, huh.

Truth. A lot of locals swear to underground tunnel networks, UFOs, and a bunch of weird military activity. That's not even getting into the vortex energy stuff and time portals.

I would no longer be a Trump supporter if he tried to rig his way into office, no matter how much I agree with his policies. I might have laughed at the libs initially for claiming the election was rigged, but at the point I started seeing Benford's Law violations, videos of the counting centers, and affidavits from Dem poll watchers claiming they couldn't observe, I couldn't in good faith agree with the election's outcome. That would've been the turning point in my mind. And if we reached the point of today's evidence, I would have felt about Trump x10 more venomous as I did about Clinton when she rigged the primaries from Sanders.

i don't know if my political leanings changed or what, but SNL, Colbert Report and the Daily Show all became significantly less funny from 10 years to present.

Libs: "it only flipped 38 votes, so what? Not enough to change the election"

Thedonald: "Oh no no no. It flipped 38 votes, which verifies the algorithm confirming the whole state was rigged."

More people should know about this. It's why the quality of the MSM took a precipitous nosedive right off a cliff.

Poor Kemp, you can even see him pleading with Trump in his Tweets: "But I DID call for a signature audit! 3 times now!"

Trump: "Not good enough. Don't try; do. Call an emergency session, then."

Kemp's a dirty traitor but I'd sure hate to be him right now. Stuck between treason charges and a rogue deep state that can dirty bomb your car.

I think a lot of us here understand this explanation, but my question is this:

How are these artificial votes tabulated into the system? Are they flipping Trump votes to Biden in the predetermined ratio as the physical ballots are entered into the machine, or are they ballot images from a USB stick being logged?

Basically: what is the process on the ground with either the humans or the machines that are facilitating this algorithm to work?

Ah, exactly! You put it better than I did.

I'm not seeing this on Flynn's Twitter. Or Ellis. Do we have more sauce on this? I know the legal team was granted access to audit the machines but I didn't know it was = to Flynn's forensics group.

Just checking in to ask if the findings of the machine in Ware County, GA flipping 38 votes during the audit comports with your findings?

https://thedonald.win/p/11QlKUy9qz/bombshell-dropping-with-dominion/c/

*swing cities

I'd just stay out of major metros and you'll be fine. That's my general rule of thumb until I see how things shake out.

The sources I listen to on anything related to power grid strikes or "dark winter" stuff points to the east coast as being a likely target.

Sure, sweetie.

Hate to state the obvious and I welcome rebuttals... but if we were disenfranchised of our vote in the presidential election and there are thus far no consequences to rigging, what makes this senate race any different?

Ding ding ding!

I agree, and her admission shows a clear violation in the chain of custody. That means that legally, those ballots are suspect and should be thrown out.

Given such a serious consequence, it's an amazing admission. One that to me, indicates they'd rather cop to ineptitude if it means covering criminal behavior.

After looking at the 2 hour video, I really don't think it is. But I'm the first to admit my math skills are not on par to tell, even at the ELI5 level.

This is the elections head manufacturing a cover story as to why 170k ballots mysteriously appeared for Biden in the middle of the note.

What actually happened: they needed more votes to fill the deficit. Fake "mail-in ballots" were brought in to the counting center. They all got put on a thumb drive for reporting.

What they're now trying to claim: "Oh, we had those results the whole time on a USB stick that was misplaced. Oops! Don't worry, we found it."

They're using officials and claiming "mistakes" to cover the obvious gaps in the story.

Yeah, sorry, I don't think my language was that clear: he took the actual data set, which comprises of the organic legitimate votes, as well as the manufactured votes. He was able to parse which votes were legitimate, and which were hijacked/manipulated and in what ratio.