Or trying to prevent a false flag op, as we saw go down Jan 6.
I had a great redpilling moment when I challenged someone on this. We listened to the whole speech together. She interjected when he said he wanted to protect the federal monuments from being torn down, "nobody even suggested doing that, why does he have to be so inflammatory?" She then learned that yes, this was being supported by Bowser's own groups in DC and was being used to gain political capital during BLM. When Trump said "peacefully protest," I took a bow. Nobody clapped, though.
It's been helpful saying, "Where? When did he specifically say that? Show me."
HE'S SO DIVISIVE! "How? What policies?"
HE'S RACIST! "Show me where he said something racist."
It then always boils down to not liking the way he talks, for reasons unexplainable.
They're dividing us into echo chambers that force moderates/independents to pick a side, radicalize/shift views to the extreme side of the spectrums, and then they make us all hate each other as a method of divide and conquer. It's easier to tag and trace us, too, if we're forced to be either team red or blue.
And he might be gearing up for a lawsuit and is choosing his words carefully. That's a Trump thing to do.
You never know. It's so popular that the Ds may throw a bone to the Republicans to finish it, thus creating a win for the party while not attributing it to Trump.
They're already vultures willing to take credit for the best of his ideas/work (vaccine rollout, 2k stimulus, etc).
Yes, I watched the Pompeo speech and he was cagey about the incoming admin and never once mentioned "the new Biden administration."
I've put my hopium pipe down since the 6th but I wish they'd get on with any alternate arrangements or state clearly that Biden will be the one sworn in.
Yes they are. Curious that I've not seen a single user here advocate an inauguration protest, let alone an armed one.
Oh noes, a main Trump-supporting site was publicizing a Trump rally in accordance with the 1st amendment rights of assembly and political speech! The HORROR!
"Former Ukrainian Government officials Konstantin Kulyk, Oleksandr Onyshchenko, Andriy Telizhenko, and current Ukraine Member of Parliament Oleksandr Dubinsky have publicly appeared or affiliated themselves with Derkach through the coordinated dissemination and promotion of fraudulent and unsubstantiated allegations involving a U.S. political candidate. They have made repeated public statements to advance disinformation narratives that U.S. government officials have engaged in corrupt dealings in Ukraine. These efforts are consistent with and in support of Derkach’s efforts, acting as an agent of the Russian intelligence services, to influence the 2020 U.S. Presidential election."
Holy shit, they're going after those in Ukraine who have called out the Biden family for their corrupt dealings. What horseshit.
"Death to conservatives"... so you really want to kill half the population with views different from your own?
Or, are you trying to provoke/incite a conservative audience into hating you (and 50% of the population)?
You're going to be deported from here, but people who read your garbage should also understand the motive behind such posts.
Hold on, let me go ask the head of the Pentagon what the top secret plans may or may not be...
Point being, friend, ain't none of us privy to such info if it does in fact exist.
They're waiting until he's in office so he can take credit for Trump's 2k check idea. Assholes.
Someone in the Chans said Trump called on Modi to nationalize Amazon in India (among other nations). God that would be hilarious. And something not out of character for the country, either.
Yes. The purge is segregating us into easily identifiable black and red ant camps, in hopes of getting us to see our fellow ants as "the other" worthy of contempt and condemnation.
Given that half+ the country voted for Trump, Silicon Valley surely knows it's a thin excuse to claim that his supporters are dangerous radicals. I truly think the goal is to create simplified echo chambers that make it easier to profile users. It's also an attempt to split the moderates: you're either a hyper-lib Twitter user, or a hyper-conservative Parler user... and if you're not far along those spectrums, you will be by virtue of the astroturfed, botted user base on those platforms. The farther along the spectrum on either ends that we can be pushed, the easier it is to control us. The easier it is to divide us. A divided populace is easily conquered, and that's the goal. America is being balkanized.
Cool, but I'll believe it when I see it.
Like the weather forecast but with military planes. Love it.
I don't know what makes this article more legit than any of the ones saying mass arrests will be happening any day now. Fact is, all of us are in the dark right now. We're all reading the tea leaves.
You might also want to specifically state, "I'm invoking my right to remain silent and would like to speak to a lawyer," since it was recently ruled that silence can be a factor for incrimination. It was a bullshit ruling, but one everyone should know about.
Also, if you're broke, an attorney (public defender) must be appointed to represent you free.
I like how they used the word, "vote," to give to appearance that any of this is somehow democratic.
If it's fundraising for a media platform, it would have to be one of the most tone deaf things imaginable.
For the... border wall?
But then there'd actually be a warm body in his presence. It might startle him.
Dancing, unthinking robots. Sounds about right for 2021.
Irony being that those of the Jewish faith can be the most clannish of any group: how many women convert to Judaism in order to marry their husband, for ex?
So good.
The other one I really like is Randy Quaid's Trump Trumpets Reveille: https://twitter.com/randyrrquaid/status/1183010611912990721?lang=en "Is the way America goes?"