Sure they did.
"Hackers" posted on here claiming they had obtained these docs.
What I think it is? An attempt to get us to promulgate easily debunked disinfo as a further claim that "there's no real evidence." Until this is substantiated, don't take the bait.
I feel like "laches" is gonna be the new word smarmy liberals throw around to make it sound like they know what they're talking about. It's 2020's version of "emoluments clause."
It's a funny argument: "you know, if you resolved in favor of Texas and had uniform conduct, we wouldn't even be trying to form new states..."
Thank you! Here's the non-Periscope link in case anyone wants to watch from the beginning.
Which hearing? I was listening to the Wisc one here, but he's not on that:
This is Dr. Rachel (Richard) Levine, PA Sec of Health.
I scrolled for a long time trying to find this info.
Agreed, friend. I get flu-like symptoms when my coffee intake changes. I quickly added the coffee sachets (Starbucks is an example but I'm sure there are others) to my emergency list. I also have caffeine pills that I occasionally pull out when I'm going places where coffee is harder to find. They're cheap, don't require preparation, and they store well.
Hacking of the top official from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, no less. Anybody who achieved this would be vann'd so fast.
Yeah, Gorsuch is in the bag. I'm keeping my eye on Kav and Barrett (Roberts is a lost cause).
No, I just have an ounce of critical thinking and I hope everyone here does, too.
But why? Obviously the outcry is going to be that Barr's a traitor. Is that in fact the truth or is there another reason?
It's one of two things: Barr's either a traitor or some kind of double agent. If Trump could fire him just as he did with CISA, Haspel, etc... why has he not done so when he's in the fight of his life and we're in the 11th hour?
Or, maybe we'll see a Comey situation and this will be the straw that sends him packing.
Fox is just licking their wounds that their ratings took a nosedive when they veered from Trump and are now trying to get back to the teat.
My dog could make a doc like this. How can any of us know if this is legit or if you're a demoralizing shill? Proof or gtfo.
You can introduce evidence in the SCOTUS case even if lower courts prohibited it. My hope is that the records re: forensic audit can be subpoena'd anyway. I think a lot of fireworks are due to come out. I wonder if all of it will be released in court, or if some is still being held as a nuclear option in case Trump pulls Insurrection Act.
Don't lose hope, Supreme Court is a new ballgame entirely.
No, even if they stab Trump in the back they'll hear it. In fact, they might hear the case to make it an especially painful blow: a SCOTUS decision against Trump would further cement the (bs) narrative that Biden is the true president. This is one reason why even the Dem justices will likely consent to slating the case: even if the Dem justices form the minority opinion, they can use it as an opportunity to grandstand and provide talking points to the left who will use the statements to say how this is a coup.
All signs point to cards being kept very close to the chest right now.
For ex, in Michigan a red Ferrari drove up alongside a white van to deliver pallets of ballots at 3:30 am Nov 4. Countless witnesses have explained they wrote down the plate number, took pictures of who delivered them, etc. I guarantee you friendly intel agencies have already mapped out and surveilled those networks, probably even before the election. Yet, that info's not been published or advertised by the legal team. The footage from GA was just a tiny snack.
"At some point, we need to let the dying die so that the living may live." -Styx
One more thing for everyone's list: if you have a vice, stock up. Being without power sucks enough, but it's not the time you want to withdraw from cigs, weed, or even coffee. Plus, shit's good for bartering.
I've lived in countries with frequent power outages and I wouldn't skimp on simple creature comforts. Lots of books, a chess set, and a hobby that doesn't rely on electricity is helpful (wood carving, stitching, etc).
Kids who don't have parents in countries far, far away. Those are the ones likely used for these trials.
Edit for fun fact: look up the studies Tavistock has done regarding children, and then crossapply that timeframe with NATO backed color revolutions in which the west took over children's homes. For ex: their study on neuroplasticity when children grow up without stimuli, done in Romania.
George Webb believes corona was deployed during the Wuhan NATO military games in which teams of people got sick with COVID-like infections. The Chinese working in the garment district of Milan likely brought it into Italy. It's a shame that it was covered as a conspiracy theory by the Daily Mail, but given that Webb's work always gets banned and memory-holed, I'm at least grateful there's some archive of his work.
She's the Condoleezza Rice of the Democrats. They needed an empty vessel of color and she fit the bill.
I honestly believed that listening to NPR every day made me more informed and more intellectual than my peers.
How do we know they're false positives, instead of... well, positives?
Ah, I read the article. They reference it's because 2 spikes on the protein are identical to the spikes on HIV. What's interesting is this: Fauci patented two such HIV spikes. Indian researchers were the first to identify these sequences in the COVID-19 code, and they were immediately rebuked by the broader int'l community such that they retracted their paper. But their findings weren't necessarily wrong. COVID-19 shares similarities to HIV that are almost impossible for nature to have produced on its own: it's very likely a bioweapon produced jointly by Ft Dietrich and the Wuhan lab.