OK--I realize I need to make a distinction. I am not talking about a whistleblower, more like offering the criminal for admitting to their crime.
I re-read your title and I see I misread it originally since I think all Democrats are criminals. At least that's my excuse for misreading it!
Uhhhh--because that's illegal?
Does anyone know if the states in question have laws that require that the scanned images be retained?
Yeah--perfect warning! But I would say they are more activist leftist judges than just liberal.
Why isn't she pleading with Antifa instead?
<sarcasm>It does not matter because you don't have any evidence or proof of fraud. It was all purely coincidence. Also, you don't have any evidence of fraud, and you are 0 of 28,942 lawsuits.</sarcasm>
The hearing was a joke. When you have two rabid liberals who didn't even allow the plaintiff the courtesy of a rebuttal. All the other older judges just basically sat passively and basically looked like they already had their minds made up.
The grandstanding and political speeches afforded the two leftists were appalling because they weren't addressing the complaints, but a lecture that was basically, "How Dare You!"
Also, they were supposed to be afforded 5 minutes or something for their statements, and the plaintiffs weren't even afforded 2 minutes before they were continually interrupted and effectively bullied.
I posted where you can watch the whole video: https://thedonald.win/p/11R4NwsRDF/here-is-the-full-video-of-the-wi/
I posted where you can watch the whole video: https://thedonald.win/p/11R4NwsRDF/here-is-the-full-video-of-the-wi/
They don't care is the answer. They have their own agenda.
If we don't stop the fraud now, they will only use it to disguise their future fraud even better. It will become impossible to know.
They have already used all kinds of skirting the law to get unsolicited mail-in ballots counted. Everyone knew that it would lead to massive fraud, yet Repukebiclans in a lot of places acquiesced to all the unconstitutional rule changes. Heck, the GA Sec of State even signed an agreement with the "real" governor Stacey Adams to allow all the shenanigans.
People asking for instances of fraud that is proven when the people that committed the fraud are holding onto all the evidence and plaintiffs does not have access. Should not a fair court allow discovery? Should not "findings of fact" be committed under oath and cross-examined before they are accepted as fact?
We need the whole video. She was like this right from the get-go. She did not let the plaintiff lawyer finish his introduction before she interrupted (together with her other liberal justice) and called the lawsuit racist, to grandstand, gaslight and essentially telegraph her political views rather than act impartially.
The left gets away with this all the time because they do not believe in the impartiality in application of the law. Conservatives on the other hand, sit back and never fight back since it goes against their principles. This is weaponized by the left against us. And yes--I'm including all the feckless swamp Repukeblicans that sit idly by and succumbing to the demands of the left for fear of being called names.
Does someone have the full video on streamable or elsewhere since it has been marked as private on YT? I want to watch the whole thing, but was cutoff at about the 1 hour mark.
Does someone have the video?
Anyone have the full video? I was about an hour into the YT video before it was marked to private and haven't seen the whole thing.
Did someone record this? I was in the middle of it and it is now marked private.
The feed got stopped?
He's the Trojan Horse. No way Pelosi doesn't enact 25th and put Kamala in there as soon as it's practical.
I believe this is based on Ed Solomon's work here: LAYMAN'S EXPLANATION OF THE WHEEL
Math warning--there are more videos on his channel: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/euqC6crTYegj/
The problem will be explaining this to everyday peeps. It's quite simple once you understand the basic premise, but it is complex to explain.
I believe this is based on Ed Solomon's work here: LAYMAN'S EXPLANATION OF THE WHEEL
Math warning--there are more videos on his channel: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/euqC6crTYegj/
The problem will be explaining this to everyday peeps. It's quite simple once you understand the basic premise, but it is complex to explain.
Off to Rumble, BitChute, et al.
Exactly what I postulated earlier tonight, but the Negative Nelly's were not reacting well to the then breaking news.
Hold the Line Patriots!
Yeah--understandable. I just used a free protonmail.com email account to register.